Engineering & Construction
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
SHIM vs PRIM vs MYRG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Engineering & Construction
Engineering & Construction
SHIM vs PRIM vs MYRG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction |
| Market Cap | $204M | $5.50B | $7.08B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $493M | $7.49B | $3.82B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-26M | $248M | $142M |
| Gross Margin | 6.8% | 10.4% | 11.9% |
| Operating Margin | -3.9% | 4.9% | 5.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 16.9x | 46.8x |
| Total Debt | $16M | $1.28B | $104M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $541M | $150M |
SHIM vs PRIM vs MYRG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shimmick Corporatio… (SHIM) | 100 | 91.5 | -8.5% |
| Primoris Services C… (PRIM) | 100 | 333.9 | +233.9% |
| MYR Group Inc. (MYRG) | 100 | 365.5 | +265.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SHIM vs PRIM vs MYRG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SHIM is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +252.2% vs PRIM's +56.2%
PRIM has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 19.0%, EPS growth 51.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.7%
- PEG 0.92 vs MYRG's 2.81
- 19.0% revenue growth vs SHIM's 2.6%
MYRG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.70
- 17.9% 10Y total return vs PRIM's 359.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.70, Low D/E 15.7%, current ratio 1.33x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.0% revenue growth vs SHIM's 2.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.9x vs 46.8x), PEG 0.92 vs 2.81 | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.7% margin vs SHIM's -5.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.70 vs PRIM's 1.83, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +252.2% vs PRIM's +56.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.7% ROA vs SHIM's -11.8% |
SHIM vs PRIM vs MYRG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SHIM vs PRIM vs MYRG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MYRG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRIM is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.5B annually — 15.2x SHIM's $493M. MYRG is the more profitable business, keeping 3.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SHIM's -5.2%. On growth, MYRG holds the edge at +20.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $493M | $7.5B | $3.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$10M | $437M | $261M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$26M | $248M | $142M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$71M | $165M | $231M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +6.8% | +10.4% | +11.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.9% | +4.9% | +5.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.2% | +3.3% | +3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -14.5% | +2.2% | +6.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.0% | -5.4% | +20.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +92.6% | -60.5% | +106.2% |
Valuation Metrics
PRIM leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.2x trailing earnings, PRIM trades at a 67% valuation discount to MYRG's 60.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PRIM offers better value at 1.10x vs MYRG's 3.62x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $204M | $5.5B | $7.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $200M | $6.2B | $7.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.66x | 20.19x | 60.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 16.95x | 46.85x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.10x | 3.62x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 12.32x | 30.70x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.41x | 0.73x | 1.94x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 3.30x | 10.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 16.14x | 30.50x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MYRG leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MYRG delivers a 22.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $15 for PRIM. MYRG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PRIM's 0.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MYRG scores 8/9 vs PRIM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +15.2% | +22.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -11.8% | +5.6% | +8.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +13.6% | +18.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -147.8% | +16.3% | +19.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.76x | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | $735M | -$47M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $541M | $150M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $16M | $1.3B | $104M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.82x | 21.02x | 39.49x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MYRG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MYRG five years ago would be worth $54,972 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,859 for SHIM. Over the past 12 months, SHIM leads with a +252.2% total return vs PRIM's +56.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRIM at 61.2% vs SHIM's -4.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +85.9% | -22.3% | +100.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +252.2% | +56.2% | +197.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.4% | +319.2% | +240.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.4% | +215.3% | +449.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.4% | +359.9% | +1794.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -4.0% | +61.2% | +50.4% |
Risk & Volatility
MYRG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MYRG is the less volatile stock with a 1.70 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRIM's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MYRG currently trades 95.7% from its 52-week high vs PRIM's 49.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.78x | 1.83x | 1.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.76 | $205.50 | $475.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.30 | $63.36 | $151.34 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.8% | +49.3% | +95.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.4 | 77.1 | 87.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 159K | 1.0M | 300K |
Analyst Outlook
MYRG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SHIM as "Hold", PRIM as "Buy", MYRG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 58.5% upside for PRIM (target: $161) vs -20.4% for MYRG (target: $362). PRIM is the only dividend payer here at 0.31% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.00 | $160.63 | $362.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 22 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.32 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% | +1.1% |
MYRG leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PRIM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
SHIM vs PRIM vs MYRG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SHIM or PRIM or MYRG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) is the stronger pick with 19.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 6% for Shimmick Corporation Common Stock (SHIM). Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) offers the better valuation at 20. 2x trailing P/E (16. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SHIM or PRIM or MYRG?
On trailing P/E, Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) is the cheapest at 20.
2x versus MYR Group Inc. at 60. 4x. On forward P/E, Primoris Services Corporation is actually cheaper at 16. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Primoris Services Corporation wins at 0. 92x versus MYR Group Inc. 's 2. 81x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SHIM or PRIM or MYRG?
Over the past 5 years, MYR Group Inc.
(MYRG) delivered a total return of +449. 7%, compared to -11. 4% for Shimmick Corporation Common Stock (SHIM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MYRG returned +1794% versus SHIM's -11. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SHIM or PRIM or MYRG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MYR Group Inc.
(MYRG) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 70β versus Primoris Services Corporation's 1. 83β — meaning PRIM is approximately 8% more volatile than MYRG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MYR Group Inc. (MYRG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 76% for Primoris Services Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SHIM or PRIM or MYRG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) is pulling ahead at 19.
0% versus 2. 6% for Shimmick Corporation Common Stock (SHIM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MYR Group Inc. grew EPS 311. 5% year-over-year, compared to 51. 7% for Primoris Services Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, PRIM leads at 19. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SHIM or PRIM or MYRG?
Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) is the more profitable company, earning 3.
6% net margin versus -5. 2% for Shimmick Corporation Common Stock — meaning it keeps 3. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRIM leads at 5. 5% versus -3. 9% for SHIM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MYRG leads at 11. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SHIM or PRIM or MYRG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 92x versus MYR Group Inc. 's 2. 81x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) trades at 16. 9x forward P/E versus 46. 8x for MYR Group Inc. — 29. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRIM: 58. 5% to $160. 63.
08Which pays a better dividend — SHIM or PRIM or MYRG?
In this comparison, PRIM (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. SHIM, MYRG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SHIM or PRIM or MYRG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MYR Group Inc.
(MYRG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1794% 10Y return). Shimmick Corporation Common Stock (SHIM) carries a higher beta of 1. 78 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MYRG: +1794%, SHIM: -11. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SHIM and PRIM and MYRG?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SHIM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRIM is a small-cap high-growth stock; MYRG is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.