Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SHIP vs SBLK

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SHIP
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNASDAQ • GR
Market Cap$342M
5Y Perf.-17.4%
SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers Corp.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNASDAQ • GR
Market Cap$3.09B
5Y Perf.+426.7%

SHIP vs SBLK — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SHIP logoSHIP
SBLK logoSBLK
IndustryMarine ShippingMarine Shipping
Market Cap$342M$3.09B
Revenue (TTM)$153M$1.04B
Net Income (TTM)$15M$84M
Gross Margin45.4%33.0%
Operating Margin23.4%13.6%
Forward P/E6.9x8.0x
Total Debt$290M$1.07B
Cash & Equiv.$63M$500M

SHIP vs SBLKLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SHIP
SBLK
StockMay 20May 26Return
Seanergy Maritime H… (SHIP)10082.6-17.4%
Star Bulk Carriers … (SBLK)100526.7+426.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SHIP vs SBLK

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SHIP leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Star Bulk Carriers Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SHIP
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
The Income Pick

SHIP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.21, yield 2.9%
  • Rev growth -5.6%, EPS growth -52.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.1%
  • -5.6% revenue growth vs SBLK's -17.6%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
The Long-Run Compounder

SBLK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 9.8% 10Y total return vs SHIP's -99.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.73, Low D/E 43.8%, current ratio 1.78x
  • Beta 0.73, yield 1.1%, current ratio 1.78x
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSHIP logoSHIP-5.6% revenue growth vs SBLK's -17.6%
ValueSHIP logoSHIPLower P/E (6.9x vs 8.0x)
Quality / MarginsSHIP logoSHIP9.7% margin vs SBLK's 8.1%
Stability / SafetySBLK logoSBLKBeta 0.73 vs SHIP's 1.21, lower leverage
DividendsSHIP logoSHIP2.9% yield, vs SBLK's 1.1%
Momentum (1Y)SHIP logoSHIP+207.0% vs SBLK's +83.1%
Efficiency (ROA)SHIP logoSHIP2.5% ROA vs SBLK's 2.2%, ROIC 6.1% vs 3.2%

SHIP vs SBLK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SHIPSeanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
FY 2021
Time Charter
81.5%$125M
Spot Charter
18.5%$28M
SBLKStar Bulk Carriers Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

SHIP vs SBLK — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSHIPLAGGINGSBLK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

SHIP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

SBLK is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.0B annually — 6.8x SHIP's $153M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 9.7% (SHIP) to 8.1% (SBLK). On growth, SHIP holds the edge at +18.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$153M$1.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$68M$311M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$15M$84M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$6M$209M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+45.4%+33.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+23.4%+13.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+9.7%+8.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-4.2%+20.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+18.6%-2.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+84.4%+58.3%
SHIP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SHIP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 16.0x trailing earnings, SHIP trades at a 56% valuation discount to SBLK's 36.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SHIP's 7.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SBLK's 11.9x.

MetricSHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…
Market CapShares × price$342M$3.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$570M$3.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS16.05x36.73x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.6.93x8.00x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.75x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.38x11.87x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.16x2.97x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.18x1.26x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF20.11x14.73x
SHIP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SHIP leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

SHIP delivers a 5.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $3 for SBLK. SBLK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.44x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SHIP's 1.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SBLK scores 5/9 vs SHIP's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricSHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+5.3%+3.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+2.5%+2.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.1%+3.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+7.1%+4.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–935
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.03x0.44x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$228M$572M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$63M$500M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$290M$1.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.68x2.08x
SHIP leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

SHIP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in SBLK five years ago would be worth $17,911 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,564 for SHIP. Over the past 12 months, SHIP leads with a +207.0% total return vs SBLK's +83.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SHIP at 56.3% vs SBLK's 17.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+79.9%+40.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+207.0%+83.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+282.1%+60.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+65.6%+79.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.7%+977.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+56.3%+17.1%
SHIP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

SBLK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

SBLK is the less volatile stock with a 0.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SHIP's 1.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.

MetricSHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.21x0.73x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$16.77$27.20
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$5.37$14.79
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+96.6%+98.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10062.972.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded258K1.4M
SBLK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

SHIP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Wall Street rates SHIP as "Buy" and SBLK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.2% upside for SBLK (target: $29) vs 4.9% for SHIP (target: $17). For income investors, SHIP offers the higher dividend yield at 2.85% vs SBLK's 1.11%.

MetricSHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$17.00$29.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts324
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.9%+1.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.46$0.30
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+3.2%
SHIP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

SHIP leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SBLK leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility).

Best OverallSeanergy Maritime Holdings … (SHIP)Leads 5 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SHIP vs SBLK: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SHIP or SBLK a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.

(SHIP) is the stronger pick with -5. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -17. 6% for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK). Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (6. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SHIP or SBLK?

On trailing P/E, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.

(SHIP) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus Star Bulk Carriers Corp. at 36. 7x. On forward P/E, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. is actually cheaper at 6. 9x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SHIP or SBLK?

Over the past 5 years, Star Bulk Carriers Corp.

(SBLK) delivered a total return of +79. 1%, compared to +65. 6% for Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SBLK returned +977. 3% versus SHIP's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SHIP or SBLK?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Star Bulk Carriers Corp.

(SBLK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 73β versus Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. 's 1. 21β — meaning SHIP is approximately 66% more volatile than SBLK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 44% versus 103% for Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SHIP or SBLK?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.

(SHIP) is pulling ahead at -5. 6% versus -17. 6% for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. grew EPS -52. 1% year-over-year, compared to -73. 9% for Star Bulk Carriers Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SHIP leads at 8. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SHIP or SBLK?

Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.

(SHIP) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 2% net margin versus 8. 1% for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. — meaning it keeps 13. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SHIP leads at 26. 0% versus 13. 5% for SBLK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SHIP leads at 39. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SHIP or SBLK more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.

(SHIP) trades at 6. 9x forward P/E versus 8. 0x for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. — 1. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SBLK: 8. 2% to $29. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SHIP or SBLK?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP) offers the highest yield at 2. 9%, versus 1. 1% for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK).

09

Is SHIP or SBLK better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Star Bulk Carriers Corp.

(SBLK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 1. 1% yield, +977. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SBLK: +977. 3%, SHIP: -99. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SHIP and SBLK?

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SHIP is a small-cap deep-value stock; SBLK is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

SHIP

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SBLK

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SHIP and SBLK on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SHIP: 18.6% · SBLK: -2.7%)
Net Margin>
%
(SHIP: 9.7% · SBLK: 8.1%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(SHIP: 16.0x · SBLK: 36.7x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.