Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SILO vs CMPS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Care Facilities
SILO vs CMPS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Medical - Care Facilities |
| Market Cap | $2M | $938M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $72K | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-5M | $-288M |
| Gross Margin | -8.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -74.5% | — |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $21M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $150M |
SILO vs CMPS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Silo Pharma, Inc. (SILO) | 100 | 120.6 | +20.6% |
| COMPASS Pathways plc (CMPS) | 100 | 22.3 | -77.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SILO vs CMPS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SILO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 0.0%, EPS growth 0.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.4%
- 20.3% 10Y total return vs CMPS's -66.3%
- 0.0% revenue growth vs CMPS's -85.7%
CMPS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.33
- Lower volatility, beta 1.33, current ratio 0.77x
- Beta 1.33, current ratio 0.77x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 0.0% revenue growth vs CMPS's -85.7% | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.3% margin vs SILO's -70.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.33 vs SILO's 2.21 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +167.4% vs SILO's -48.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -79.5% ROA vs CMPS's -106.8% |
SILO vs CMPS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SILO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SILO and CMPS operate at a comparable scale, with $72,102 and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $72,102 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5M | -$179M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$5M | -$288M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | -$157M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -8.1% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -74.5% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -70.4% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -66.6% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | 0.0% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +45.5% | -58.7% |
Valuation Metrics
CMPS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2M | $938M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$2M | $809M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.35x | -3.17x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 26.18x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.31x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SILO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SILO delivers a -101.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-101 in annual profit, vs $-3 for CMPS.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -101.4% | -3.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -79.5% | -106.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -186.7% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -74.0% | -2.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | -$129M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $150M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $21M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1053.72x | -52.40x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CMPS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SILO five years ago would be worth $17,045 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,816 for CMPS. Over the past 12 months, CMPS leads with a +167.4% total return vs SILO's -48.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CMPS at 4.9% vs SILO's -42.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +25.3% | +49.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -48.4% | +167.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.0% | +15.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +70.4% | -71.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.3% | -66.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -42.5% | +4.9% |
Risk & Volatility
CMPS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CMPS is the less volatile stock with a 1.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SILO's 2.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CMPS currently trades 95.6% from its 52-week high vs SILO's 37.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.21x | 1.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.13 | $10.21 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.22 | $2.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +37.3% | +95.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.2 | 65.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.7M | 3.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $17.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +9.2% | 0.0% |
CMPS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). SILO leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency).
SILO vs CMPS: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SILO or CMPS a better buy right now?
Analysts rate COMPASS Pathways plc (CMPS) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison.
The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SILO or CMPS?
Over the past 5 years, Silo Pharma, Inc.
(SILO) delivered a total return of +70. 4%, compared to -71. 8% for COMPASS Pathways plc (CMPS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SILO returned +20. 3% versus CMPS's -66. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SILO or CMPS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), COMPASS Pathways plc (CMPS) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
33β versus Silo Pharma, Inc. 's 2. 21β — meaning SILO is approximately 66% more volatile than CMPS relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — SILO or CMPS?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Silo Pharma, Inc.
grew EPS 0. 8% year-over-year, compared to -33. 9% for COMPASS Pathways plc. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SILO or CMPS?
COMPASS Pathways plc (CMPS) is the more profitable company, earning 0.
0% net margin versus -60. 9% for Silo Pharma, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CMPS leads at 0. 0% versus -65. 3% for SILO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SILO leads at 91. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — SILO or CMPS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is SILO or CMPS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, COMPASS Pathways plc (CMPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.
Silo Pharma, Inc. (SILO) carries a higher beta of 2. 21 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CMPS: -66. 3%, SILO: +20. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SILO and CMPS?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.