Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SILO vs MNMD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
SILO vs MNMD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $2M | $2.04B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $72K | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-5M | $-238M |
| Gross Margin | -8.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -74.5% | — |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $258M |
SILO vs MNMD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Silo Pharma, Inc. (SILO) | 100 | 120.3 | +20.3% |
| Mind Medicine (Mind… (MNMD) | 100 | 42.7 | -57.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SILO vs MNMD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SILO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 0.0%, EPS growth 0.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.4%
- 0.0% revenue growth vs MNMD's -96.9%
MNMD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.68
- 5.1% 10Y total return vs SILO's 20.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.68, current ratio 6.29x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 0.0% revenue growth vs MNMD's -96.9% | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.2% margin vs SILO's -70.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.68 vs SILO's 2.21 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +214.0% vs SILO's -48.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -70.7% ROA vs SILO's -79.5%, ROIC -389.5% vs -186.7% |
SILO vs MNMD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SILO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SILO and MNMD operate at a comparable scale, with $72,102 and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $72,102 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5M | -$191M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$5M | -$238M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | -$174M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -8.1% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -74.5% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -70.4% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -66.6% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | 0.0% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +45.5% | -163.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SILO and MNMD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2M | $2.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$2M | $1.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.35x | -10.04x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 26.12x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.31x | 5.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MNMD leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SILO delivers a -101.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-101 in annual profit, vs $-102 for MNMD. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MNMD scores 3/9 vs SILO's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -101.4% | -102.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -79.5% | -70.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -186.7% | -3.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -74.0% | -52.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | -$258M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $258M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1053.72x | -21.81x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MNMD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SILO five years ago would be worth $16,471 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,205 for MNMD. Over the past 12 months, MNMD leads with a +214.0% total return vs SILO's -48.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MNMD at 82.7% vs SILO's -42.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +25.0% | +51.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -48.1% | +214.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.1% | +510.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +64.7% | -57.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.0% | +512.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -42.6% | +82.7% |
Risk & Volatility
MNMD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MNMD is the less volatile stock with a 1.68 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SILO's 2.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MNMD currently trades 98.1% from its 52-week high vs SILO's 37.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.21x | 1.68x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.13 | $21.09 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.22 | $6.03 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +37.2% | +98.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.0 | 64.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.6M | 792K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $20.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +9.2% | 0.0% |
MNMD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). SILO leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
SILO vs MNMD: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SILO or MNMD a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Mind Medicine (MindMed) Inc.
(MNMD) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SILO or MNMD?
Over the past 5 years, Silo Pharma, Inc.
(SILO) delivered a total return of +64. 7%, compared to -57. 9% for Mind Medicine (MindMed) Inc. (MNMD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MNMD returned +512. 1% versus SILO's +20. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SILO or MNMD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mind Medicine (MindMed) Inc.
(MNMD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 68β versus Silo Pharma, Inc. 's 2. 21β — meaning SILO is approximately 31% more volatile than MNMD relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — SILO or MNMD?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Silo Pharma, Inc.
grew EPS 0. 8% year-over-year, compared to -1273. 3% for Mind Medicine (MindMed) Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SILO or MNMD?
Mind Medicine (MindMed) Inc.
(MNMD) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -60. 9% for Silo Pharma, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MNMD leads at 0. 0% versus -65. 3% for SILO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SILO leads at 91. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — SILO or MNMD?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is SILO or MNMD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Mind Medicine (MindMed) Inc.
(MNMD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+512. 1% 10Y return). Silo Pharma, Inc. (SILO) carries a higher beta of 2. 21 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MNMD: +512. 1%, SILO: +20. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SILO and MNMD?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.