Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
SLAB vs SWKS vs QRVO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
SLAB vs SWKS vs QRVO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $7.14B | $9.77B | $8.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $785M | $4.04B | $3.68B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-65M | $361M | $339M |
| Gross Margin | 58.2% | 41.1% | 45.9% |
| Operating Margin | -9.0% | 9.4% | 11.2% |
| Forward P/E | 80.0x | 13.8x | 13.7x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $1.20B | $1.55B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $364M | $1.16B | $1.22B |
SLAB vs SWKS vs QRVO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Silicon Laboratorie… (SLAB) | 100 | 231.2 | +131.2% |
| Skyworks Solutions,… (SWKS) | 100 | 54.8 | -45.2% |
| Qorvo, Inc. (QRVO) | 100 | 84.9 | -15.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SLAB vs SWKS vs QRVO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SLAB has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.25
- Rev growth 34.3%, EPS growth 66.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -8.5%
- 369.4% 10Y total return vs QRVO's 92.9%
SWKS is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 4.3% yield; 12-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend
QRVO is the clearest fit if your priority is value and quality.
- Lower P/E (13.7x vs 80.0x)
- 9.2% margin vs SLAB's -8.3%
- 5.6% ROA vs SLAB's -5.1%, ROIC 8.1% vs -6.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.3% revenue growth vs SWKS's -2.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.7x vs 80.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.2% margin vs SLAB's -8.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.25 vs SWKS's 1.36 | |
| Dividends | 4.3% yield; 12-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +102.9% vs SWKS's +2.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.6% ROA vs SLAB's -5.1%, ROIC 8.1% vs -6.9% |
SLAB vs SWKS vs QRVO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SLAB vs SWKS vs QRVO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SLAB leads in 2 of 6 categories
SWKS leads 1 • QRVO leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SLAB and QRVO each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SWKS is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.0B annually — 5.2x SLAB's $785M. QRVO is the more profitable business, keeping 9.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SLAB's -8.3%. On growth, SLAB holds the edge at +25.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $785M | $4.0B | $3.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$32M | $842M | $607M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$65M | $361M | $339M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $66M | $697M | $680M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +58.2% | +41.1% | +45.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -9.0% | +9.4% | +11.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -8.3% | +8.9% | +9.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.4% | +17.2% | +18.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.2% | -1.0% | -7.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +88.8% | -44.2% | -3.0% |
Valuation Metrics
SWKS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.1x trailing earnings, SWKS trades at a 14% valuation discount to QRVO's 24.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SWKS's 10.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than QRVO's 20.8x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.1B | $9.8B | $8.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.8B | $9.8B | $8.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -109.36x | 21.09x | 24.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 80.01x | 13.78x | 13.66x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 10.19x | 20.84x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.09x | 2.39x | 2.24x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.47x | 1.75x | 2.49x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 108.48x | 8.84x | 12.13x |
Profitability & Efficiency
QRVO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
QRVO delivers a 9.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-6 for SLAB. SWKS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to QRVO's 0.46x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), QRVO scores 8/9 vs SWKS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.9% | +6.3% | +9.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.1% | +4.6% | +5.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -6.9% | +6.3% | +8.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -6.3% | +7.0% | +8.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.21x | 0.46x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$364M | $42M | $330M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $364M | $1.2B | $1.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $1.2B | $1.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -58.63x | 14.46x | 6.34x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SLAB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SLAB five years ago would be worth $16,304 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,424 for SWKS. Over the past 12 months, SLAB leads with a +102.9% total return vs SWKS's +2.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SLAB at 16.5% vs SWKS's -11.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +64.1% | +2.0% | +3.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +102.9% | +2.7% | +26.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +58.2% | -30.4% | -5.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +63.0% | -55.8% | -51.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +369.4% | +31.9% | +92.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.5% | -11.4% | -1.9% |
Risk & Volatility
SLAB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SLAB is the less volatile stock with a 1.25 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SWKS's 1.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SLAB currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs SWKS's 71.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.25x | 1.36x | 1.31x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $218.66 | $90.90 | $106.30 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $102.82 | $51.92 | $69.03 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.0% | +71.5% | +83.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 77.0 | 78.1 | 76.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 469K | 3.2M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SLAB as "Buy", SWKS as "Buy", QRVO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply -2.3% upside for SLAB (target: $212) vs -4.1% for QRVO (target: $85). SWKS is the only dividend payer here at 4.29% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $211.60 | $62.75 | $85.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 37 | 59 | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 12 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.79 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.5% | +6.5% |
SLAB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). SWKS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
SLAB vs SWKS vs QRVO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SLAB or SWKS or QRVO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Silicon Laboratories Inc.
(SLAB) is the stronger pick with 34. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 2% for Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS). Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS) offers the better valuation at 21. 1x trailing P/E (13. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Silicon Laboratories Inc. (SLAB) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SLAB or SWKS or QRVO?
On trailing P/E, Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
(SWKS) is the cheapest at 21. 1x versus Qorvo, Inc. at 24. 6x. On forward P/E, Qorvo, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SLAB or SWKS or QRVO?
Over the past 5 years, Silicon Laboratories Inc.
(SLAB) delivered a total return of +63. 0%, compared to -55. 8% for Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SLAB returned +369. 4% versus SWKS's +31. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SLAB or SWKS or QRVO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Silicon Laboratories Inc.
(SLAB) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 25β versus Skyworks Solutions, Inc. 's 1. 36β — meaning SWKS is approximately 9% more volatile than SLAB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 46% for Qorvo, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SLAB or SWKS or QRVO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Silicon Laboratories Inc.
(SLAB) is pulling ahead at 34. 3% versus -2. 2% for Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Qorvo, Inc. grew EPS 524. 1% year-over-year, compared to -16. 5% for Skyworks Solutions, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, QRVO leads at 1. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SLAB or SWKS or QRVO?
Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
(SWKS) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 7% net margin versus -8. 3% for Silicon Laboratories Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SWKS leads at 12. 2% versus -9. 0% for SLAB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SLAB leads at 58. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SLAB or SWKS or QRVO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Qorvo, Inc.
(QRVO) trades at 13. 7x forward P/E versus 80. 0x for Silicon Laboratories Inc. — 66. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SLAB: -2. 3% to $211. 60.
08Which pays a better dividend — SLAB or SWKS or QRVO?
In this comparison, SWKS (4.
3% yield) pays a dividend. SLAB, QRVO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SLAB or SWKS or QRVO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
(SWKS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (4. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SWKS: +31. 9%, QRVO: +92. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SLAB and SWKS and QRVO?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SLAB is a small-cap high-growth stock; SWKS is a small-cap income-oriented stock; QRVO is a small-cap quality compounder stock. SWKS pays a dividend while SLAB, QRVO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.