Oil & Gas Integrated
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SLNG vs GTLS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
SLNG vs GTLS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Integrated | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $80M | $9.94B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $68M | $4.26B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1M | $40M |
| Gross Margin | 18.3% | 32.6% |
| Operating Margin | -3.4% | 8.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 16.4x |
| Total Debt | $9M | $3.74B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $366M |
SLNG vs GTLS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stabilis Solutions,… (SLNG) | 100 | 165.8 | +65.8% |
| Chart Industries, I… (GTLS) | 100 | 529.3 | +429.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SLNG vs GTLS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SLNG is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta -0.44, Low D/E 13.2%, current ratio 1.30x
- Lower D/E ratio (13.2% vs 110.9%)
GTLS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.56, yield 0.3%
- Rev growth 2.5%, EPS growth -92.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 38.3%
- 7.4% 10Y total return vs SLNG's -78.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.5% revenue growth vs SLNG's -6.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.9% margin vs SLNG's -2.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (13.2% vs 110.9%) | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.4% vs SLNG's -26.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.4% ROA vs SLNG's -1.6%, ROIC 7.4% vs -2.8% |
SLNG vs GTLS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SLNG vs GTLS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GTLS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GTLS is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.3B annually — 62.5x SLNG's $68M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 0.9% (GTLS) to -2.0% (SLNG). On growth, GTLS holds the edge at -2.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $68M | $4.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5M | $644M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1M | $40M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $949,000 | $203M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.3% | +32.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.4% | +8.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.0% | +0.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | +4.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -23.3% | -2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -112.8% | -36.1% |
Valuation Metrics
SLNG leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, GTLS's 14.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SLNG's 16.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $80M | $9.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $82M | $13.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -59.20x | 629.58x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 16.43x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.89x | 14.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.17x | 2.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.20x | 2.79x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 173.49x | 49.04x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GTLS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GTLS delivers a 1.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-2 for SLNG. SLNG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GTLS's 1.11x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GTLS scores 5/9 vs SLNG's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.0% | +1.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.6% | +0.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.8% | +7.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.4% | +8.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | 1.11x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $366M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9M | $3.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -12.70x | 1.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GTLS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GTLS five years ago would be worth $13,325 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,301 for SLNG. Over the past 12 months, GTLS leads with a +37.4% total return vs SLNG's -26.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GTLS at 17.7% vs SLNG's 10.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.9% | +0.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -26.8% | +37.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +35.1% | +63.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -47.0% | +33.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.5% | +740.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.6% | +17.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SLNG and GTLS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SLNG is the less volatile stock with a -0.44 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GTLS's 0.56 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GTLS currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs SLNG's 67.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.44x | 0.56x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.36 | $208.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.21 | $140.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +67.8% | +99.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.9 | 50.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 50K | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
GTLS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SLNG as "Buy" and GTLS as "Buy". GTLS is the only dividend payer here at 0.29% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $193.81 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.60 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
GTLS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SLNG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
SLNG vs GTLS: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SLNG or GTLS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is the stronger pick with 2. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 9% for Stabilis Solutions, Inc. (SLNG). Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS) offers the better valuation at 629. 6x trailing P/E (16. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Stabilis Solutions, Inc. (SLNG) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SLNG or GTLS?
Over the past 5 years, Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) delivered a total return of +33. 2%, compared to -47. 0% for Stabilis Solutions, Inc. (SLNG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GTLS returned +740. 5% versus SLNG's -78. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SLNG or GTLS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Stabilis Solutions, Inc.
(SLNG) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 44β versus Chart Industries, Inc. 's 0. 56β — meaning GTLS is approximately -227% more volatile than SLNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Stabilis Solutions, Inc. (SLNG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 111% for Chart Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — SLNG or GTLS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is pulling ahead at 2. 5% versus -6. 9% for Stabilis Solutions, Inc. (SLNG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Chart Industries, Inc. grew EPS -92. 0% year-over-year, compared to -129. 1% for Stabilis Solutions, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GTLS leads at 38. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SLNG or GTLS?
Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 0% net margin versus -2. 0% for Stabilis Solutions, Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GTLS leads at 15. 2% versus -3. 7% for SLNG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GTLS leads at 29. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — SLNG or GTLS?
In this comparison, GTLS (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. SLNG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is SLNG or GTLS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Stabilis Solutions, Inc.
(SLNG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 44)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SLNG: -78. 5%, GTLS: +740. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SLNG and GTLS?
These companies operate in different sectors (SLNG (Energy) and GTLS (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.