SLNG vs GTLS vs CLNE

For growth investors, Chart Industries, Inc.

(GTLS) is the stronger pick with 2. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 9% for Stabilis Solutions, Inc. (SLNG). Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS) offers the better valuation at 629. 6x trailing P/E (16. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Stabilis Solutions, Inc. (SLNG) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Chart Industries, Inc.

(GTLS) delivered a total return of +33. 2%, compared to -77. 1% for Clean Energy Fuels Corp. (CLNE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GTLS returned +740. 5% versus SLNG's -80. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Stabilis Solutions, Inc.

(SLNG) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 44β versus Clean Energy Fuels Corp. 's 1. 19β — meaning CLNE is approximately -371% more volatile than SLNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Stabilis Solutions, Inc. (SLNG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 111% for Chart Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Chart Industries, Inc.

(GTLS) is pulling ahead at 2. 5% versus -6. 9% for Stabilis Solutions, Inc. (SLNG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Chart Industries, Inc. grew EPS -92. 0% year-over-year, compared to -173. 0% for Clean Energy Fuels Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GTLS leads at 38. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Chart Industries, Inc.

(GTLS) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 0% net margin versus -52. 3% for Clean Energy Fuels Corp. — meaning it keeps 1. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GTLS leads at 15. 2% versus -35. 0% for CLNE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GTLS leads at 29. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CLNE: 56.

2% to $3. 50.

In this comparison, GTLS (0.

3% yield) pays a dividend. SLNG, CLNE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Stabilis Solutions, Inc.

(SLNG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 44)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SLNG: -80. 5%, CLNE: -28. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (SLNG (Energy) and GTLS (Industrials) and CLNE (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.