Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SMPL vs FRPT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaged Foods
SMPL vs FRPT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $1.26B | $2.69B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.45B | $1.14B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $91M | $200M |
| Gross Margin | 34.0% | 38.9% |
| Operating Margin | 14.4% | 8.8% |
| Forward P/E | 7.6x | 40.4x |
| Total Debt | $304M | $560M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $98M | $278M |
SMPL vs FRPT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Simply Good Foo… (SMPL) | 100 | 74.2 | -25.8% |
| Freshpet, Inc. (FRPT) | 100 | 71.2 | -28.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SMPL vs FRPT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SMPL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.38
- Lower volatility, beta 0.38, Low D/E 16.8%, current ratio 3.64x
- Beta 0.38, current ratio 3.64x
FRPT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 13.0%, EPS growth 183.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.8%
- 5.2% 10Y total return vs SMPL's 5.3%
- 13.0% revenue growth vs SMPL's 9.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.0% revenue growth vs SMPL's 9.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.6x vs 40.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.6% margin vs SMPL's 6.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.38 vs FRPT's 0.91, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -32.1% vs SMPL's -65.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.4% ROA vs SMPL's 3.7%, ROIC 5.3% vs 8.1% |
SMPL vs FRPT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SMPL vs FRPT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FRPT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SMPL and FRPT operate at a comparable scale, with $1.4B and $1.1B in trailing revenue. FRPT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SMPL's 6.3%. On growth, FRPT holds the edge at +13.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.4B | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $231M | $165M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $91M | $200M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $174M | $223M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.0% | +38.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.4% | +8.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.3% | +17.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.0% | +19.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.3% | +13.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -31.6% | +4.5% |
Valuation Metrics
SMPL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.4x trailing earnings, SMPL trades at a 40% valuation discount to FRPT's 20.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SMPL's 6.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FRPT's 16.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $2.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $3.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.38x | 20.80x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.57x | 40.42x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.52x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.05x | 16.37x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.87x | 2.44x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.71x | 2.55x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.98x | 217.70x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SMPL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FRPT delivers a 17.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $5 for SMPL. SMPL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FRPT's 0.46x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FRPT scores 6/9 vs SMPL's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.2% | +17.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.7% | +11.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.1% | +5.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.4% | +6.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 0.46x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $206M | $282M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $98M | $278M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $304M | $560M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.77x | 13.29x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FRPT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SMPL five years ago would be worth $3,630 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,189 for FRPT. Over the past 12 months, FRPT leads with a -32.1% total return vs SMPL's -65.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FRPT at -6.7% vs SMPL's -31.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -35.4% | -8.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -65.1% | -32.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.3% | -18.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.7% | -68.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.3% | +515.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -31.1% | -6.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SMPL and FRPT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SMPL is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FRPT's 0.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FRPT currently trades 61.2% from its 52-week high vs SMPL's 34.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.38x | 0.91x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $36.99 | $89.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.21 | $46.76 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +34.1% | +61.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.4 | 36.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.8M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SMPL as "Buy" and FRPT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 59.7% upside for SMPL (target: $20) vs 33.7% for FRPT (target: $73).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.17 | $73.42 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.0% | 0.0% |
FRPT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). SMPL leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
SMPL vs FRPT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SMPL or FRPT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Freshpet, Inc.
(FRPT) is the stronger pick with 13. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 0% for The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL). The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) offers the better valuation at 12. 4x trailing P/E (7. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SMPL or FRPT?
On trailing P/E, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the cheapest at 12.
4x versus Freshpet, Inc. at 20. 8x. On forward P/E, The Simply Good Foods Company is actually cheaper at 7. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SMPL or FRPT?
Over the past 5 years, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) delivered a total return of -63.
7%, compared to -68. 1% for Freshpet, Inc. (FRPT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FRPT returned +515. 1% versus SMPL's +5. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SMPL or FRPT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
38β versus Freshpet, Inc. 's 0. 91β — meaning FRPT is approximately 140% more volatile than SMPL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 46% for Freshpet, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SMPL or FRPT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Freshpet, Inc.
(FRPT) is pulling ahead at 13. 0% versus 9. 0% for The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Freshpet, Inc. grew EPS 183. 9% year-over-year, compared to -26. 1% for The Simply Good Foods Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, FRPT leads at 22. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SMPL or FRPT?
Freshpet, Inc.
(FRPT) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 6% net margin versus 7. 1% for The Simply Good Foods Company — meaning it keeps 12. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SMPL leads at 15. 1% versus 8. 6% for FRPT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FRPT leads at 38. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SMPL or FRPT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) trades at 7.
6x forward P/E versus 40. 4x for Freshpet, Inc. — 32. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SMPL: 59. 7% to $20. 17.
08Which pays a better dividend — SMPL or FRPT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is SMPL or FRPT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
38)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SMPL: +5. 3%, FRPT: +515. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SMPL and FRPT?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SMPL is a small-cap deep-value stock; FRPT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.