Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SMPL vs FRPT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SMPL
The Simply Good Foods Company

Packaged Foods

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.26B
5Y Perf.-25.8%
FRPT
Freshpet, Inc.

Packaged Foods

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.69B
5Y Perf.-28.8%

SMPL vs FRPT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SMPL logoSMPL
FRPT logoFRPT
IndustryPackaged FoodsPackaged Foods
Market Cap$1.26B$2.69B
Revenue (TTM)$1.45B$1.14B
Net Income (TTM)$91M$200M
Gross Margin34.0%38.9%
Operating Margin14.4%8.8%
Forward P/E7.6x40.4x
Total Debt$304M$560M
Cash & Equiv.$98M$278M

SMPL vs FRPTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SMPL
FRPT
StockMay 20May 26Return
The Simply Good Foo… (SMPL)10074.2-25.8%
Freshpet, Inc. (FRPT)10071.2-28.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SMPL vs FRPT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FRPT leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. The Simply Good Foods Company is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SMPL
The Simply Good Foods Company
The Income Pick

SMPL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • beta 0.38
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.38, Low D/E 16.8%, current ratio 3.64x
  • Beta 0.38, current ratio 3.64x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
FRPT
Freshpet, Inc.
The Growth Play

FRPT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 13.0%, EPS growth 183.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.8%
  • 5.2% 10Y total return vs SMPL's 5.3%
  • 13.0% revenue growth vs SMPL's 9.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFRPT logoFRPT13.0% revenue growth vs SMPL's 9.0%
ValueSMPL logoSMPLLower P/E (7.6x vs 40.4x)
Quality / MarginsFRPT logoFRPT17.6% margin vs SMPL's 6.3%
Stability / SafetySMPL logoSMPLBeta 0.38 vs FRPT's 0.91, lower leverage
DividendsTieNeither stock pays a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)FRPT logoFRPT-32.1% vs SMPL's -65.1%
Efficiency (ROA)FRPT logoFRPT11.4% ROA vs SMPL's 3.7%, ROIC 5.3% vs 8.1%

SMPL vs FRPT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SMPLThe Simply Good Foods Company
FY 2025
Shipping and Handling
100.0%$103M
FRPTFreshpet, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$1.1B

SMPL vs FRPT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSMPLLAGGINGFRPT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FRPT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

SMPL and FRPT operate at a comparable scale, with $1.4B and $1.1B in trailing revenue. FRPT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SMPL's 6.3%. On growth, FRPT holds the edge at +13.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSMPL logoSMPLThe Simply Good F…FRPT logoFRPTFreshpet, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.4B$1.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$231M$165M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$91M$200M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$174M$223M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+34.0%+38.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+14.4%+8.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+6.3%+17.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+12.0%+19.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-0.3%+13.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-31.6%+4.5%
FRPT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SMPL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 12.4x trailing earnings, SMPL trades at a 40% valuation discount to FRPT's 20.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SMPL's 6.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FRPT's 16.4x.

MetricSMPL logoSMPLThe Simply Good F…FRPT logoFRPTFreshpet, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$1.3B$2.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.5B$3.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS12.38x20.80x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.7.57x40.42x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.52x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple6.05x16.37x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.87x2.44x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.71x2.55x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF7.98x217.70x
SMPL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SMPL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

FRPT delivers a 17.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $5 for SMPL. SMPL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FRPT's 0.46x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FRPT scores 6/9 vs SMPL's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricSMPL logoSMPLThe Simply Good F…FRPT logoFRPTFreshpet, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+5.2%+17.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+3.7%+11.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+8.1%+5.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+9.4%+6.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–956
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.17x0.46x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$206M$282M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$98M$278M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$304M$560M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense6.77x13.29x
SMPL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FRPT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in SMPL five years ago would be worth $3,630 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,189 for FRPT. Over the past 12 months, FRPT leads with a -32.1% total return vs SMPL's -65.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FRPT at -6.7% vs SMPL's -31.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSMPL logoSMPLThe Simply Good F…FRPT logoFRPTFreshpet, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-35.4%-8.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-65.1%-32.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-67.3%-18.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-63.7%-68.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+5.3%+515.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-31.1%-6.7%
FRPT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — SMPL and FRPT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

SMPL is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FRPT's 0.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FRPT currently trades 61.2% from its 52-week high vs SMPL's 34.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSMPL logoSMPLThe Simply Good F…FRPT logoFRPTFreshpet, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.38x0.91x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$36.99$89.80
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$10.21$46.76
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+34.1%+61.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10044.436.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.8M1.5M
Evenly matched — SMPL and FRPT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Wall Street rates SMPL as "Buy" and FRPT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 59.7% upside for SMPL (target: $20) vs 33.7% for FRPT (target: $73).

MetricSMPL logoSMPLThe Simply Good F…FRPT logoFRPTFreshpet, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$20.17$73.42
# AnalystsCovering analysts2429
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+4.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

FRPT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). SMPL leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.

Best OverallThe Simply Good Foods Compa… (SMPL)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SMPL vs FRPT: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SMPL or FRPT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Freshpet, Inc.

(FRPT) is the stronger pick with 13. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 0% for The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL). The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) offers the better valuation at 12. 4x trailing P/E (7. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SMPL or FRPT?

On trailing P/E, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the cheapest at 12.

4x versus Freshpet, Inc. at 20. 8x. On forward P/E, The Simply Good Foods Company is actually cheaper at 7. 6x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SMPL or FRPT?

Over the past 5 years, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) delivered a total return of -63.

7%, compared to -68. 1% for Freshpet, Inc. (FRPT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FRPT returned +515. 1% versus SMPL's +5. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SMPL or FRPT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

38β versus Freshpet, Inc. 's 0. 91β — meaning FRPT is approximately 140% more volatile than SMPL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 46% for Freshpet, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SMPL or FRPT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Freshpet, Inc.

(FRPT) is pulling ahead at 13. 0% versus 9. 0% for The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Freshpet, Inc. grew EPS 183. 9% year-over-year, compared to -26. 1% for The Simply Good Foods Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, FRPT leads at 22. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SMPL or FRPT?

Freshpet, Inc.

(FRPT) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 6% net margin versus 7. 1% for The Simply Good Foods Company — meaning it keeps 12. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SMPL leads at 15. 1% versus 8. 6% for FRPT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FRPT leads at 38. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SMPL or FRPT more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) trades at 7.

6x forward P/E versus 40. 4x for Freshpet, Inc. — 32. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SMPL: 59. 7% to $20. 17.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SMPL or FRPT?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is SMPL or FRPT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

38)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SMPL: +5. 3%, FRPT: +515. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SMPL and FRPT?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SMPL is a small-cap deep-value stock; FRPT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

SMPL

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FRPT

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SMPL and FRPT on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SMPL: -0.3% · FRPT: 13.1%)
Net Margin>
%
(SMPL: 6.3% · FRPT: 17.6%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(SMPL: 12.4x · FRPT: 20.8x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.