Software - Application
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
SNOW vs DDOG vs MDB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Infrastructure
SNOW vs DDOG vs MDB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $52.64B | $67.18B | $23.87B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.68B | $3.67B | $2.46B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1.33B | $136M | $-71M |
| Gross Margin | 67.2% | 79.9% | 71.7% |
| Operating Margin | -30.6% | -0.7% | -5.6% |
| Forward P/E | 85.8x | 88.0x | 49.7x |
| Total Debt | $2.74B | $1.54B | $33M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.83B | $401M | $1.08B |
SNOW vs DDOG vs MDB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Snowflake Inc. (SNOW) | 100 | 61.2 | -38.8% |
| Datadog, Inc. (DDOG) | 100 | 184.7 | +84.7% |
| MongoDB, Inc. (MDB) | 100 | 126.7 | +26.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SNOW vs DDOG vs MDB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SNOW is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.39
- Rev growth 29.2%, EPS growth -2.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 31.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.39, current ratio 1.30x
DDOG has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and momentum.
- 3.7% margin vs SNOW's -28.4%
- +78.0% vs SNOW's -9.9%
- 2.1% ROA vs SNOW's -14.6%, ROIC -0.8% vs -43.1%
MDB is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 8.1% 10Y total return vs DDOG's 402.6%
- Lower P/E (49.7x vs 88.0x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.2% revenue growth vs MDB's 22.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (49.7x vs 88.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.7% margin vs SNOW's -28.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.39 vs MDB's 1.67 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 3 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +78.0% vs SNOW's -9.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.1% ROA vs SNOW's -14.6%, ROIC -0.8% vs -43.1% |
SNOW vs DDOG vs MDB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SNOW vs DDOG vs MDB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DDOG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SNOW is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.7B annually — 1.9x MDB's $2.5B. DDOG is the more profitable business, keeping 3.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SNOW's -28.4%. On growth, DDOG holds the edge at +32.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.7B | $3.7B | $2.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1.3B | $73M | -$102M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1.3B | $136M | -$71M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.1B | $1.1B | $510M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +67.2% | +79.9% | +71.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -30.6% | -0.7% | -5.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -28.4% | +3.7% | -2.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.9% | +29.4% | +20.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +30.1% | +32.2% | +26.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.1% | +120.9% | -5.3% |
Valuation Metrics
MDB leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $52.6B | $67.2B | $23.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $52.6B | $68.3B | $22.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -38.92x | 629.10x | -333.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 85.81x | 87.97x | 49.73x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 874.03x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 11.24x | 19.60x | 9.69x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 25.69x | 18.38x | 8.07x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 46.99x | 67.14x | 47.26x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DDOG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DDOG delivers a 3.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-66 for SNOW. MDB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SNOW's 1.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DDOG scores 6/9 vs MDB's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -65.9% | +3.8% | -2.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -14.6% | +2.1% | -2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -43.1% | -0.8% | -4.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -27.5% | -1.0% | -4.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.36x | 0.41x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$87M | $1.1B | -$1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.8B | $401M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.7B | $1.5B | $33M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -115.44x | 4.03x | -10.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DDOG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DDOG five years ago would be worth $24,418 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,461 for SNOW. Over the past 12 months, DDOG leads with a +78.0% total return vs SNOW's -9.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DDOG at 33.9% vs SNOW's -1.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -29.1% | +41.1% | -26.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -9.9% | +78.0% | +68.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -4.2% | +140.3% | +18.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -25.4% | +144.2% | +12.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.5% | +402.6% | +814.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.4% | +33.9% | +5.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SNOW and DDOG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SNOW is the less volatile stock with a 1.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MDB's 1.67 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DDOG currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs SNOW's 54.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.39x | 1.40x | 1.67x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $280.67 | $201.69 | $444.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $118.30 | $98.01 | $170.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +54.8% | +93.6% | +66.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.2 | 66.5 | 53.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.7M | 5.0M | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SNOW as "Buy", DDOG as "Buy", MDB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 52.7% upside for SNOW (target: $235) vs -7.5% for DDOG (target: $175).
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $234.79 | $174.63 | $413.36 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 50 | 47 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | 0.0% | +1.7% |
DDOG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MDB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
SNOW vs DDOG vs MDB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SNOW or DDOG or MDB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Snowflake Inc.
(SNOW) is the stronger pick with 29. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 22. 8% for MongoDB, Inc. (MDB). Datadog, Inc. (DDOG) offers the better valuation at 629. 1x trailing P/E (88. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Snowflake Inc. (SNOW) a "Buy" — based on 50 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SNOW or DDOG or MDB?
On forward P/E, MongoDB, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 49. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SNOW or DDOG or MDB?
Over the past 5 years, Datadog, Inc.
(DDOG) delivered a total return of +144. 2%, compared to -25. 4% for Snowflake Inc. (SNOW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MDB returned +814. 9% versus SNOW's -39. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SNOW or DDOG or MDB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Snowflake Inc.
(SNOW) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 39β versus MongoDB, Inc. 's 1. 67β — meaning MDB is approximately 20% more volatile than SNOW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MongoDB, Inc. (MDB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 136% for Snowflake Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SNOW or DDOG or MDB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Snowflake Inc.
(SNOW) is pulling ahead at 29. 2% versus 22. 8% for MongoDB, Inc. (MDB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MongoDB, Inc. grew EPS 49. 1% year-over-year, compared to -41. 2% for Datadog, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SNOW leads at 31. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SNOW or DDOG or MDB?
Datadog, Inc.
(DDOG) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 1% net margin versus -28. 4% for Snowflake Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DDOG leads at -1. 3% versus -30. 6% for SNOW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DDOG leads at 80. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SNOW or DDOG or MDB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, MongoDB, Inc.
(MDB) trades at 49. 7x forward P/E versus 88. 0x for Datadog, Inc. — 38. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SNOW: 52. 7% to $234. 79.
08Which pays a better dividend — SNOW or DDOG or MDB?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is SNOW or DDOG or MDB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MongoDB, Inc.
(MDB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+814. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MDB: +814. 9%, SNOW: -39. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SNOW and DDOG and MDB?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.