REIT - Hotel & Motel
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SOHO vs CLDT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Hotel & Motel
SOHO vs CLDT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Hotel & Motel | REIT - Hotel & Motel |
| Market Cap | $46M | $416M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $179M | $295M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-310K | $15M |
| Gross Margin | 25.0% | 3.5% |
| Operating Margin | 9.6% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 63.2x |
| Total Debt | $340M | $359M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $33M |
SOHO vs CLDT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Feb 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sotherly Hotels Inc. (SOHO) | 100 | 76.5 | -23.5% |
| Chatham Lodging Tru… (CLDT) | 100 | 105.3 | +5.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SOHO vs CLDT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SOHO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.52, yield 18.3%
- Rev growth 4.6%, EPS growth -54.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.5%
- -25.6% 10Y total return vs CLDT's -32.4%
CLDT is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and efficiency.
- 5.1% margin vs SOHO's -0.2%
- 1.3% ROA vs SOHO's -0.1%, ROIC 1.7% vs 4.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.6% FFO/revenue growth vs CLDT's -7.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.1% margin vs SOHO's -0.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs CLDT's 1.00 | |
| Dividends | 18.3% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +208.2% vs CLDT's +31.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.3% ROA vs SOHO's -0.1%, ROIC 1.7% vs 4.3% |
SOHO vs CLDT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SOHO vs CLDT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLDT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLDT is the larger business by revenue, generating $295M annually — 1.6x SOHO's $179M. CLDT is the more profitable business, keeping 5.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SOHO's -0.2%. On growth, SOHO holds the edge at -6.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $179M | $295M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $37M | $94M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$310,423 | $15M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $7M | $51M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.0% | +3.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.6% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.2% | +5.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.1% | +17.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.6% | -9.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.9% | +163.9% |
Valuation Metrics
SOHO leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CLDT's 8.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SOHO's 9.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $46M | $416M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $379M | $743M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.62x | 63.21x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.47x | 8.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.25x | 1.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.05x | 0.57x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.78x | 10.52x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CLDT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CLDT delivers a 1.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $-1 for SOHO. CLDT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.46x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SOHO's 8.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CLDT scores 6/9 vs SOHO's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.7% | +1.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.1% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.3% | +1.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.6% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 8.18x | 0.46x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $333M | $326M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $33M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $340M | $359M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.99x | 1.69x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SOHO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CLDT five years ago would be worth $7,814 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,120 for SOHO. Over the past 12 months, SOHO leads with a +208.2% total return vs CLDT's +31.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SOHO at 6.5% vs CLDT's -0.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.1% | +31.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +208.2% | +31.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.6% | -2.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.8% | -21.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -25.6% | -32.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.5% | -0.8% |
Risk & Volatility
SOHO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SOHO is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CLDT's 1.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.52x | 1.00x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.25 | $9.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.68 | $6.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +100.0% | +97.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.0 | 64.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 266K |
Analyst Outlook
CLDT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
SOHO is the only dividend payer here at 18.26% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $11.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +18.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.41 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.2% |
CLDT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SOHO leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns).
SOHO vs CLDT: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SOHO or CLDT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sotherly Hotels Inc.
(SOHO) is the stronger pick with 4. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 0% for Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT). Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) offers the better valuation at 63. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SOHO or CLDT?
Over the past 5 years, Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) delivered a total return of -21.
9%, compared to -28. 8% for Sotherly Hotels Inc. (SOHO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SOHO returned -25. 6% versus CLDT's -32. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SOHO or CLDT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sotherly Hotels Inc.
(SOHO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 52β versus Chatham Lodging Trust's 1. 00β — meaning CLDT is approximately 92% more volatile than SOHO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 46% versus 8% for Sotherly Hotels Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — SOHO or CLDT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sotherly Hotels Inc.
(SOHO) is pulling ahead at 4. 6% versus -7. 0% for Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Chatham Lodging Trust grew EPS 275. 0% year-over-year, compared to -54. 5% for Sotherly Hotels Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SOHO leads at 12. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SOHO or CLDT?
Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) is the more profitable company, earning 5.
1% net margin versus 0. 7% for Sotherly Hotels Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SOHO leads at 11. 4% versus 9. 0% for CLDT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SOHO leads at 25. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — SOHO or CLDT?
In this comparison, SOHO (18.
3% yield) pays a dividend. CLDT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is SOHO or CLDT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sotherly Hotels Inc.
(SOHO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 52), 18. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SOHO: -25. 6%, CLDT: -32. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SOHO and CLDT?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SOHO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CLDT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. SOHO pays a dividend while CLDT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.