Regulated Gas
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SPH vs TRGP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
SPH vs TRGP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Regulated Gas | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $1.30B | $54.26B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $842M | $16.38B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $133M | $2.13B |
| Gross Margin | -10.4% | 22.1% |
| Operating Margin | 25.4% | 21.1% |
| Forward P/E | 10.5x | 24.9x |
| Total Debt | $1.33B | $17.55B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $166M |
SPH vs TRGP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Suburban Propane Pa… (SPH) | 100 | 134.1 | +34.1% |
| Targa Resources Cor… (TRGP) | 100 | 1411.1 | +1311.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SPH vs TRGP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SPH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.25, yield 6.6%
- Rev growth 7.9%, EPS growth 42.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.25, current ratio 0.55x
TRGP is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 6.2% 10Y total return vs SPH's 26.2%
- +61.6% vs SPH's +4.0%
- 8.5% ROA vs SPH's 5.7%, ROIC 13.2% vs 8.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.9% revenue growth vs TRGP's 3.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.5x vs 24.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.8% margin vs TRGP's 13.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.25 vs TRGP's 0.29, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.6% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs TRGP's 1.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +61.6% vs SPH's +4.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.5% ROA vs SPH's 5.7%, ROIC 13.2% vs 8.1% |
SPH vs TRGP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SPH vs TRGP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SPH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRGP is the larger business by revenue, generating $16.4B annually — 19.5x SPH's $842M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 15.8% (SPH) to 13.0% (TRGP). On growth, TRGP holds the edge at -15.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $842M | $16.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $284M | $5.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $133M | $2.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $111M | $1.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -10.4% | +22.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +25.4% | +21.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.8% | +13.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.2% | +7.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | -15.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +31792.8% | -100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
SPH leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.1x trailing earnings, SPH trades at a 59% valuation discount to TRGP's 29.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SPH's 9.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TRGP's 14.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $54.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.6B | $71.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.07x | 29.63x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.54x | 24.88x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.12x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.43x | 14.44x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.91x | 3.17x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.14x | 16.97x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.37x | 92.90x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TRGP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TRGP delivers a 70.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $71 in annual profit, vs $20 for SPH. SPH carries lower financial leverage with a 2.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TRGP's 5.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SPH scores 7/9 vs TRGP's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +20.4% | +70.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.7% | +8.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.1% | +13.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.4% | +16.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.22x | 5.49x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.3B | $17.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $166M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.3B | $17.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.42x | 6.52x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TRGP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRGP five years ago would be worth $69,223 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,719 for SPH. Over the past 12 months, TRGP leads with a +61.6% total return vs SPH's +4.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRGP at 54.4% vs SPH's 15.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.2% | +36.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +4.0% | +61.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +55.5% | +268.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +77.2% | +592.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.2% | +618.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.9% | +54.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SPH and TRGP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SPH is the less volatile stock with a 0.25 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TRGP's 0.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.25x | 0.29x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.80 | $261.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.30 | $144.14 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.0% | +96.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.3 | 54.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 104K | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
SPH leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SPH as "Hold" and TRGP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7.4% upside for SPH (target: $21) vs -5.8% for TRGP (target: $238). For income investors, SPH offers the higher dividend yield at 6.56% vs TRGP's 1.51%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $21.00 | $237.70 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.6% | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.28 | $3.81 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.2% |
SPH leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). TRGP leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
SPH vs TRGP: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SPH or TRGP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Suburban Propane Partners, L.
P. (SPH) is the stronger pick with 7. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 1% for Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP). Suburban Propane Partners, L. P. (SPH) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (10. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SPH or TRGP?
On trailing P/E, Suburban Propane Partners, L.
P. (SPH) is the cheapest at 12. 1x versus Targa Resources Corp. at 29. 6x. On forward P/E, Suburban Propane Partners, L. P. is actually cheaper at 10. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SPH or TRGP?
Over the past 5 years, Targa Resources Corp.
(TRGP) delivered a total return of +592. 2%, compared to +77. 2% for Suburban Propane Partners, L. P. (SPH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRGP returned +618. 0% versus SPH's +26. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SPH or TRGP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Suburban Propane Partners, L.
P. (SPH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 25β versus Targa Resources Corp. 's 0. 29β — meaning TRGP is approximately 19% more volatile than SPH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Suburban Propane Partners, L. P. (SPH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 5% for Targa Resources Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SPH or TRGP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Suburban Propane Partners, L.
P. (SPH) is pulling ahead at 7. 9% versus 3. 1% for Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Targa Resources Corp. grew EPS 48. 4% year-over-year, compared to 42. 1% for Suburban Propane Partners, L. P.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SPH leads at -1. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SPH or TRGP?
Targa Resources Corp.
(TRGP) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus 7. 4% for Suburban Propane Partners, L. P. — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRGP leads at 20. 1% versus 14. 4% for SPH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRGP leads at 26. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SPH or TRGP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Suburban Propane Partners, L.
P. (SPH) trades at 10. 5x forward P/E versus 24. 9x for Targa Resources Corp. — 14. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SPH: 7. 4% to $21. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SPH or TRGP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Suburban Propane Partners, L. P. (SPH) offers the highest yield at 6. 6%, versus 1. 5% for Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP).
09Is SPH or TRGP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Targa Resources Corp.
(TRGP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 29), 1. 5% yield, +618. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TRGP: +618. 0%, SPH: +26. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SPH and TRGP?
These companies operate in different sectors (SPH (Utilities) and TRGP (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SPH is a small-cap deep-value stock; TRGP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.