Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
SPXC vs GNRC vs FELE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
Industrial - Machinery
SPXC vs GNRC vs FELE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $10.18B | $15.81B | $4.39B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.35B | $4.33B | $2.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $254M | $189M | $150M |
| Gross Margin | 37.7% | 38.1% | 35.2% |
| Operating Margin | 16.9% | 7.5% | 12.6% |
| Forward P/E | 25.3x | 30.2x | 21.6x |
| Total Debt | $498M | $1.33B | $280M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $364M | $341M | $100M |
SPXC vs GNRC vs FELE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SPX Technologies, I… (SPXC) | 100 | 507.4 | +407.4% |
| Generac Holdings In… (GNRC) | 100 | 242.1 | +142.1% |
| Franklin Electric C… (FELE) | 100 | 195.9 | +95.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SPXC vs GNRC vs FELE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SPXC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 14.2%, EPS growth 17.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.7%
- 11.7% 10Y total return vs GNRC's 6.7%
- PEG 1.33 vs FELE's 2.48
GNRC is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +123.4% vs FELE's +14.9%
FELE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 32 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 1.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 21.1%, current ratio 2.79x
- Beta 0.89, yield 1.1%, current ratio 2.79x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.2% revenue growth vs GNRC's -2.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (21.6x vs 30.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.8% margin vs GNRC's 4.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.89 vs GNRC's 1.69, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield; 32-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +123.4% vs FELE's +14.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.6% ROA vs GNRC's 3.4%, ROIC 14.7% vs 5.9% |
SPXC vs GNRC vs FELE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SPXC vs GNRC vs FELE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FELE leads in 3 of 6 categories
SPXC leads 2 • GNRC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SPXC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GNRC is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.3B annually — 2.0x FELE's $2.2B. SPXC is the more profitable business, keeping 10.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GNRC's 4.4%. On growth, SPXC holds the edge at +17.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.3B | $4.3B | $2.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $492M | $472M | $322M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $254M | $189M | $150M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $385M | $419M | $169M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.7% | +38.1% | +35.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.9% | +7.5% | +12.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.8% | +4.4% | +6.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.4% | +9.7% | +7.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.4% | +12.4% | +9.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.2% | +69.9% | +13.4% |
Valuation Metrics
FELE leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 30.6x trailing earnings, FELE trades at a 69% valuation discount to GNRC's 100.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SPXC offers better value at 2.11x vs FELE's 3.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10.2B | $15.8B | $4.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.3B | $16.8B | $4.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 40.09x | 100.15x | 30.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 25.31x | 30.18x | 21.64x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.11x | — | 3.51x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.47x | 34.71x | 13.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.49x | 3.76x | 2.06x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.40x | 6.05x | 3.39x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 42.20x | 58.96x | 22.67x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FELE leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SPXC delivers a 12.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $7 for GNRC. FELE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GNRC's 0.51x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GNRC scores 6/9 vs FELE's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.4% | +7.2% | +11.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.1% | +3.4% | +7.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.4% | +5.9% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.0% | +6.9% | +18.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 0.51x | 0.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $134M | $992M | $181M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $364M | $341M | $100M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $498M | $1.3B | $280M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.50x | 4.54x | 24.75x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SPXC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SPXC five years ago would be worth $31,898 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,827 for GNRC. Over the past 12 months, GNRC leads with a +123.4% total return vs FELE's +14.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SPXC at 41.3% vs FELE's 3.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.2% | +90.9% | +3.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +35.8% | +123.4% | +14.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +182.3% | +143.9% | +9.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +219.0% | -11.7% | +21.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1169.3% | +673.7% | +229.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +41.3% | +34.6% | +3.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GNRC and FELE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FELE is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GNRC's 1.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GNRC currently trades 98.9% from its 52-week high vs SPXC's 82.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.31x | 1.69x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $246.68 | $272.40 | $111.53 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $147.39 | $117.22 | $83.42 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.2% | +98.9% | +89.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.8 | 77.1 | 51.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 468K | 892K | 275K |
Analyst Outlook
FELE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SPXC as "Buy", GNRC as "Buy", FELE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 24.2% upside for SPXC (target: $252) vs 0.7% for FELE (target: $100). FELE is the only dividend payer here at 1.11% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $252.00 | $275.11 | $100.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 39 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 32 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.00 | $1.11 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.9% | +3.8% |
FELE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). SPXC leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). 1 tied.
SPXC vs GNRC vs FELE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SPXC or GNRC or FELE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SPX Technologies, Inc.
(SPXC) is the stronger pick with 14. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 0% for Generac Holdings Inc. (GNRC). Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. (FELE) offers the better valuation at 30. 6x trailing P/E (21. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SPX Technologies, Inc. (SPXC) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SPXC or GNRC or FELE?
On trailing P/E, Franklin Electric Co.
, Inc. (FELE) is the cheapest at 30. 6x versus Generac Holdings Inc. at 100. 2x. On forward P/E, Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. is actually cheaper at 21. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: SPX Technologies, Inc. wins at 1. 33x versus Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. 's 2. 48x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SPXC or GNRC or FELE?
Over the past 5 years, SPX Technologies, Inc.
(SPXC) delivered a total return of +219. 0%, compared to -11. 7% for Generac Holdings Inc. (GNRC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SPXC returned +1169% versus FELE's +229. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SPXC or GNRC or FELE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Franklin Electric Co.
, Inc. (FELE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 89β versus Generac Holdings Inc. 's 1. 69β — meaning GNRC is approximately 91% more volatile than FELE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. (FELE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 51% for Generac Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SPXC or GNRC or FELE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SPX Technologies, Inc.
(SPXC) is pulling ahead at 14. 2% versus -2. 0% for Generac Holdings Inc. (GNRC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SPX Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 17. 9% year-over-year, compared to -50. 1% for Generac Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SPXC leads at 15. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SPXC or GNRC or FELE?
SPX Technologies, Inc.
(SPXC) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus 3. 8% for Generac Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SPXC leads at 16. 8% versus 6. 9% for GNRC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GNRC leads at 38. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SPXC or GNRC or FELE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, SPX Technologies, Inc. (SPXC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 33x versus Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. 's 2. 48x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. (FELE) trades at 21. 6x forward P/E versus 30. 2x for Generac Holdings Inc. — 8. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SPXC: 24. 2% to $252. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SPXC or GNRC or FELE?
In this comparison, FELE (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. SPXC, GNRC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SPXC or GNRC or FELE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Franklin Electric Co.
, Inc. (FELE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 89), 1. 1% yield, +229. 5% 10Y return). Generac Holdings Inc. (GNRC) carries a higher beta of 1. 69 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FELE: +229. 5%, GNRC: +673. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SPXC and GNRC and FELE?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
FELE pays a dividend while SPXC, GNRC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.