Real Estate - Diversified
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
STRS vs ALEX vs GRBK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Retail
Residential Construction
STRS vs ALEX vs GRBK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Diversified | REIT - Retail | Residential Construction |
| Market Cap | $239M | $1.52B | $2.83B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $32M | $207M | $2.10B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-8M | $65M | $313M |
| Gross Margin | -7.0% | 46.5% | 30.5% |
| Operating Margin | -43.4% | 41.8% | 19.5% |
| Forward P/E | 124.2x | 31.1x | 11.0x |
| Total Debt | $210M | $506M | $335M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $11M | $191M |
STRS vs ALEX vs GRBK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stratus Properties … (STRS) | 100 | 175.7 | +75.7% |
| Alexander & Baldwin… (ALEX) | 100 | 182.2 | +82.2% |
| Green Brick Partner… (GRBK) | 100 | 613.8 | +513.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STRS vs ALEX vs GRBK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
STRS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 213.7%, EPS growth 113.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 24.3%
- 213.7% FFO/revenue growth vs ALEX's -12.7%
- +62.8% vs GRBK's +10.5%
ALEX has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 4.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.27, Low D/E 51.2%, current ratio 1.01x
- Beta 0.27, yield 4.3%, current ratio 1.01x
GRBK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 7.4% 10Y total return vs ALEX's 75.5%
- PEG 0.42 vs ALEX's 0.49
- Lower P/E (11.0x vs 31.1x), PEG 0.42 vs 0.49
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 213.7% FFO/revenue growth vs ALEX's -12.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.0x vs 31.1x), PEG 0.42 vs 0.49 | |
| Quality / Margins | 31.3% margin vs STRS's -25.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.27 vs GRBK's 1.06 | |
| Dividends | 4.3% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs STRS's 0.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +62.8% vs GRBK's +10.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.0% ROA vs STRS's -1.4%, ROIC 15.4% vs -0.3% |
STRS vs ALEX vs GRBK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
STRS vs ALEX vs GRBK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALEX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GRBK is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.1B annually — 65.8x STRS's $32M. ALEX is the more profitable business, keeping 31.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to STRS's -25.4%. On growth, GRBK holds the edge at -2.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $32M | $207M | $2.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$8M | $110M | $415M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$8M | $65M | $313M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$47M | $27M | $208M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -7.0% | +46.5% | +30.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -43.4% | +41.8% | +19.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -25.4% | +31.3% | +14.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -147.4% | +13.2% | +9.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -44.1% | -18.4% | -2.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -12.8% | -69.5% | -22.9% |
Valuation Metrics
GRBK leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.3x trailing earnings, GRBK trades at a 93% valuation discount to STRS's 124.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GRBK offers better value at 0.36x vs ALEX's 0.37x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $239M | $1.5B | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $429M | $2.0B | $3.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 124.17x | 23.42x | 9.29x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 31.10x | 10.98x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.37x | 0.36x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 125.94x | 23.32x | 7.19x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.41x | 7.34x | 1.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.82x | 1.54x | 1.49x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 55.58x | 13.60x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GRBK leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GRBK delivers a 17.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-2 for STRS. GRBK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to STRS's 0.71x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALEX scores 6/9 vs GRBK's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.4% | +6.4% | +17.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.4% | +3.9% | +13.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.3% | +3.5% | +15.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.4% | +4.5% | +19.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.71x | 0.51x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $190M | $495M | $144M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $11M | $191M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $210M | $506M | $335M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 3.13x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GRBK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GRBK five years ago would be worth $25,408 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,809 for STRS. Over the past 12 months, STRS leads with a +62.8% total return vs GRBK's +10.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GRBK at 9.5% vs STRS's 3.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +24.1% | +0.9% | +3.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +62.8% | +24.9% | +10.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +11.4% | +26.9% | +31.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.1% | +35.4% | +154.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +49.0% | +75.5% | +742.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.7% | +8.3% | +9.5% |
Risk & Volatility
ALEX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALEX is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GRBK's 1.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALEX currently trades 99.1% from its 52-week high vs GRBK's 81.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.85x | 0.27x | 1.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $32.93 | $21.02 | $80.97 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.35 | $15.07 | $56.85 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.5% | +99.1% | +81.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.4 | 65.1 | 47.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 22K | 1.6M | 200K |
Analyst Outlook
ALEX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: STRS as "Buy", ALEX as "Buy", GRBK as "Hold". For income investors, ALEX offers the higher dividend yield at 4.32% vs STRS's 0.15%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $20.95 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 8 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | +4.3% | +0.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 5 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.05 | $0.90 | $0.07 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.7% | +0.4% | +3.0% |
ALEX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). GRBK leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
STRS vs ALEX vs GRBK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STRS or ALEX or GRBK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Stratus Properties Inc.
(STRS) is the stronger pick with 213. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 7% for Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. (ALEX). Green Brick Partners, Inc. (GRBK) offers the better valuation at 9. 3x trailing P/E (11. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Stratus Properties Inc. (STRS) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — STRS or ALEX or GRBK?
On trailing P/E, Green Brick Partners, Inc.
(GRBK) is the cheapest at 9. 3x versus Stratus Properties Inc. at 124. 2x. On forward P/E, Green Brick Partners, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Green Brick Partners, Inc. wins at 0. 42x versus Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. 's 0. 49x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — STRS or ALEX or GRBK?
Over the past 5 years, Green Brick Partners, Inc.
(GRBK) delivered a total return of +154. 1%, compared to +18. 1% for Stratus Properties Inc. (STRS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GRBK returned +742. 1% versus STRS's +49. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — STRS or ALEX or GRBK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.
(ALEX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 27β versus Green Brick Partners, Inc. 's 1. 06β — meaning GRBK is approximately 295% more volatile than ALEX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Green Brick Partners, Inc. (GRBK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 71% for Stratus Properties Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — STRS or ALEX or GRBK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Stratus Properties Inc.
(STRS) is pulling ahead at 213. 7% versus -12. 7% for Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. (ALEX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Stratus Properties Inc. grew EPS 113. 0% year-over-year, compared to -16. 3% for Green Brick Partners, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, STRS leads at 24. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — STRS or ALEX or GRBK?
Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.
(ALEX) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 3% net margin versus 3. 6% for Stratus Properties Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALEX leads at 32. 9% versus -4. 0% for STRS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALEX leads at 46. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is STRS or ALEX or GRBK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Green Brick Partners, Inc. (GRBK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 42x versus Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. 's 0. 49x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Green Brick Partners, Inc. (GRBK) trades at 11. 0x forward P/E versus 31. 1x for Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. — 20. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — STRS or ALEX or GRBK?
In this comparison, ALEX (4.
3% yield), STRS (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. GRBK does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is STRS or ALEX or GRBK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.
(ALEX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 27), 4. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALEX: +75. 5%, STRS: +49. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between STRS and ALEX and GRBK?
These companies operate in different sectors (STRS (Real Estate) and ALEX (Real Estate) and GRBK (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: STRS is a small-cap high-growth stock; ALEX is a small-cap income-oriented stock; GRBK is a small-cap deep-value stock. ALEX pays a dividend while STRS, GRBK do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.