Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
STXS vs ISRG vs NVCR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
STXS vs ISRG vs NVCR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies |
| Market Cap | $177M | $161.07B | $1.92B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $30M | $10.58B | $674M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-24M | $2.98B | $-173M |
| Gross Margin | 53.1% | 66.3% | 75.2% |
| Operating Margin | -80.1% | 30.5% | -27.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 43.8x | — |
| Total Debt | $6M | $303M | $290M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $12M | $3.37B | $103M |
STXS vs ISRG vs NVCR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stereotaxis, Inc. (STXS) | 100 | 46.0 | -54.0% |
| Intuitive Surgical,… (ISRG) | 100 | 234.6 | +134.6% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 25.0 | -75.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STXS vs ISRG vs NVCR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
STXS plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
ISRG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.02
- Rev growth 20.5%, EPS growth 22.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.4%
- 5.5% 10Y total return vs NVCR's 30.3%
NVCR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +1.1% vs ISRG's -15.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.5% revenue growth vs STXS's 0.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | 28.2% margin vs STXS's -78.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.02 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 3 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +1.1% vs ISRG's -15.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.8% ROA vs STXS's -52.7%, ROIC 15.0% vs -289.6% |
STXS vs ISRG vs NVCR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
STXS vs ISRG vs NVCR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ISRG leads in 3 of 6 categories
NVCR leads 1 • STXS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ISRG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ISRG is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.6B annually — 351.9x STXS's $30M. ISRG is the more profitable business, keeping 28.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to STXS's -78.6%. On growth, ISRG holds the edge at +23.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $30M | $10.6B | $674M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$23M | $3.8B | -$165M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$24M | $3.0B | -$173M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$8M | $2.8B | -$48M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.1% | +66.3% | +75.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -80.1% | +30.5% | -27.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -78.6% | +28.2% | -25.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -28.2% | +26.8% | -7.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -18.8% | +23.0% | +12.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.0% | +18.8% | -100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
NVCR leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $177M | $161.1B | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $171M | $158.0B | $2.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.33x | 57.62x | -13.80x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 43.84x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.65x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 43.62x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.59x | 16.00x | 2.92x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 14.16x | 9.17x | 5.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 64.67x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ISRG leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ISRG delivers a 16.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-2 for STXS. ISRG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NVCR's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ISRG scores 6/9 vs STXS's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.5% | +16.9% | -50.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -52.7% | +14.8% | -16.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.9% | +15.0% | -16.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -92.0% | +16.5% | -28.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.53x | 0.02x | 0.85x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$6M | -$3.1B | $187M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $12M | $3.4B | $103M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $303M | $290M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | -96.80x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ISRG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ISRG five years ago would be worth $15,873 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $875 for NVCR. Over the past 12 months, NVCR leads with a +1.1% total return vs ISRG's -15.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ISRG at 14.4% vs NVCR's -37.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -18.1% | -19.3% | +28.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -9.1% | -15.4% | +1.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.0% | +49.6% | -75.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.6% | +58.7% | -91.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.0% | +554.2% | +30.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.6% | +14.4% | -37.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ISRG and NVCR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ISRG is the less volatile stock with a 1.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVCR currently trades 83.9% from its 52-week high vs STXS's 52.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.73x | 1.02x | 2.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.59 | $603.88 | $20.06 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.74 | $427.84 | $9.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +52.9% | +75.1% | +83.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.7 | 42.4 | 69.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 409K | 1.8M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: STXS as "Buy", ISRG as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 110.5% upside for STXS (target: $4) vs 37.3% for ISRG (target: $623).
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $4.00 | $622.60 | $33.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 55 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.4% | 0.0% |
ISRG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NVCR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
STXS vs ISRG vs NVCR: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STXS or ISRG or NVCR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
(ISRG) is the stronger pick with 20. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 5% for Stereotaxis, Inc. (STXS). Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) offers the better valuation at 57. 6x trailing P/E (43. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Stereotaxis, Inc. (STXS) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — STXS or ISRG or NVCR?
Over the past 5 years, Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
(ISRG) delivered a total return of +58. 7%, compared to -91. 3% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ISRG returned +554. 2% versus STXS's +25. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — STXS or ISRG or NVCR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
(ISRG) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 02β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 20β — meaning NVCR is approximately 116% more volatile than ISRG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 85% for NovoCure Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — STXS or ISRG or NVCR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
(ISRG) is pulling ahead at 20. 5% versus 0. 5% for Stereotaxis, Inc. (STXS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. grew EPS 22. 6% year-over-year, compared to -11. 1% for Stereotaxis, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ISRG leads at 17. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — STXS or ISRG or NVCR?
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
(ISRG) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 4% net margin versus -89. 3% for Stereotaxis, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ISRG leads at 29. 3% versus -91. 9% for STXS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVCR leads at 74. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is STXS or ISRG or NVCR more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for STXS: 110.
5% to $4. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — STXS or ISRG or NVCR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is STXS or ISRG or NVCR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
(ISRG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 02), +554. 2% 10Y return). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ISRG: +554. 2%, NVCR: +30. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between STXS and ISRG and NVCR?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: STXS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ISRG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.