SWX vs NWN

For growth investors, Northwest Natural Holding Company (NWN) is the stronger pick with 11.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -62. 0% for Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc. (SWX). Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc. (SWX) offers the better valuation at 14. 9x trailing P/E (21. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc. (SWX) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc.

(SWX) is the cheapest at 14. 9x versus Northwest Natural Holding Company at 17. 6x. On forward P/E, Northwest Natural Holding Company is actually cheaper at 16. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc.

(SWX) delivered a total return of +46. 9%, compared to +6. 8% for Northwest Natural Holding Company (NWN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SWX returned +69. 3% versus NWN's +21. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Northwest Natural Holding Company (NWN) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

05β versus Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 06β — meaning SWX is approximately -210% more volatile than NWN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc. (SWX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 89% versus 187% for Northwest Natural Holding Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Northwest Natural Holding Company (NWN) is pulling ahead at 11.

8% versus -62. 0% for Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc. (SWX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 120. 3% year-over-year, compared to 36. 5% for Northwest Natural Holding Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, NWN leads at 7. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc.

(SWX) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 7% net margin versus 8. 8% for Northwest Natural Holding Company — meaning it keeps 22. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NWN leads at 31. 4% versus 24. 4% for SWX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NWN leads at 39. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Northwest Natural Holding Company (NWN) trades at 16.

0x forward P/E versus 21. 3x for Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc. — 5. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NWN: 17. 1% to $57. 00.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Northwest Natural Holding Company (NWN) offers the highest yield at 3. 9%, versus 2. 7% for Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc. (SWX).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Northwest Natural Holding Company (NWN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

05), 3. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NWN: +21. 3%, SWX: +69. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.