TARA
Protara Therapeutics, Inc.
Biotechnology
Market Cap$303M
5Y Perf.-90.1%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
TARA vs RCKT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
RCKT
Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Biotechnology
Market Cap$418M
5Y Perf.-81.5%
TARA vs RCKT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | TARA | RCKT |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $303M | $418M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-57M | $-223M |
| Total Debt | $3M | $25M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $50M | $78M |
TARA vs RCKT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
TARA
RCKT
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protara Therapeutic… (TARA) | 100 | 9.9 | -90.1% |
| Rocket Pharmaceutic… (RCKT) | 100 | 18.5 | -81.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TARA vs RCKT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: TARA leads in 3 of 5 categories, making it the strongest pick for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TARA
Protara Therapeutics, Inc.
The Income Pick
TARA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.16
- EPS growth 38.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.16, Low D/E 1.7%, current ratio 14.58x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
RCKT
Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
RCKT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -90.7% 10Y total return vs TARA's -98.2%
- 10.5% revenue growth vs TARA's -28.9%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | RCKT | 10.5% revenue growth vs TARA's -28.9% |
| Stability / Safety | TARA | Beta 1.16 vs RCKT's 1.31, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | TARA | +68.0% vs RCKT's -38.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | TARA | -33.8% ROA vs RCKT's -67.5%, ROIC -60.9% vs -63.2% |
TARA vs RCKT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLTARALAGGINGRCKT
RCKTRocket Pharmaceutical…
1leads
TARAProtara Therapeutics,…
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs RCKTMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
RCKT1/1
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
TARA2/2
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
TARA7/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
TARA4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
TARA2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RCKT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TARA and RCKT operate at a comparable scale, with $0 and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | TARAProtara Therapeut… | RCKTRocket Pharmaceut… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$64M | -$232M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$57M | -$223M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$56M | -$190M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.8% | +38.7% |
RCKT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
TARA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | TARAProtara Therapeut… | RCKTRocket Pharmaceut… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $303M | $418M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $257M | $365M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.22x | -1.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.23x | 1.55x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
TARA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TARA leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TARA delivers a -36.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-36 in annual profit, vs $-80 for RCKT. TARA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RCKT's 0.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TARA scores 3/9 vs RCKT's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | TARAProtara Therapeut… | RCKTRocket Pharmaceut… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -36.4% | -80.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -33.8% | -67.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -60.9% | -63.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -35.0% | -58.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$46M | -$53M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $50M | $78M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $25M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -40.98x | — |
TARA leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TARA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TARA five years ago would be worth $5,787 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $894 for RCKT. Over the past 12 months, TARA leads with a +68.0% total return vs RCKT's -38.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TARA at 22.4% vs RCKT's -43.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TARAProtara Therapeut… | RCKTRocket Pharmaceut… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.2% | +11.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +68.0% | -38.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +83.2% | -81.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.1% | -91.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.2% | -90.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +22.4% | -43.5% |
TARA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TARA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TARA is the less volatile stock with a 1.16 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCKT's 1.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TARA currently trades 72.4% from its 52-week high vs RCKT's 49.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | TARAProtara Therapeut… | RCKTRocket Pharmaceut… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.16x | 1.31x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.82 | $7.77 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.77 | $2.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +72.4% | +49.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.8 | 43.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 790K | 3.5M |
TARA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TARA as "Buy" and RCKT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 112.0% upside for TARA (target: $12) vs 29.5% for RCKT (target: $5).
| Metric | TARAProtara Therapeut… | RCKTRocket Pharmaceut… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.00 | $5.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
TARA leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). RCKT leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow).
Best OverallProtara Therapeutics, Inc. (TARA)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
TARA vs RCKT: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TARA or RCKT a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Protara Therapeutics, Inc.
(TARA) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — TARA or RCKT?
Over the past 5 years, Protara Therapeutics, Inc.
(TARA) delivered a total return of -42. 1%, compared to -91. 1% for Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RCKT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RCKT returned -90. 7% versus TARA's -98. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — TARA or RCKT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Protara Therapeutics, Inc.
(TARA) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 16β versus Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 1. 31β — meaning RCKT is approximately 13% more volatile than TARA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Protara Therapeutics, Inc. (TARA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 9% for Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — TARA or RCKT?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Protara Therapeutics, Inc.
grew EPS 38. 2% year-over-year, compared to 26. 4% for Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — TARA or RCKT?
Protara Therapeutics, Inc.
(TARA) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus 0. 0% for Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TARA leads at 0. 0% versus 0. 0% for RCKT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TARA leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — TARA or RCKT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is TARA or RCKT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Protara Therapeutics, Inc.
(TARA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 16)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TARA: -98. 3%, RCKT: -90. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between TARA and RCKT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.