Compare Atlassian Corporation (TEAM) vs SAP SE (SAP) vs Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) Stock

Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) offers the better valuation at 25.0x trailing P/E (16.5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Atlassian Corporation (TEAM) a "Buy" — based on 42 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) is the cheapest at 25.0x versus SAP SE at 28.5x. On forward P/E, Atlassian Corporation is actually cheaper at 15.8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Salesforce, Inc. wins at 1.35x versus SAP SE's 4.20x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

Over the past 5 years, SAP SE (SAP) delivered a total return of +71.7%, compared to -70.1% for Atlassian Corporation (TEAM). A $10,000 investment in SAP five years ago would be worth approximately $17K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TEAM returned +216.1% versus CRM's +192.3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SAP SE (SAP) is the lower-risk stock at 0.86β versus Atlassian Corporation's 1.43β — meaning TEAM is approximately 67% more volatile than SAP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 92% for Atlassian Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

SAP SE (SAP) is the more profitable company, earning 19.9% net margin versus -4.9% for Atlassian Corporation — meaning it keeps 19.9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SAP leads at 28.0% versus -2.5% for TEAM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TEAM leads at 82.8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential. By this metric, Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1.35x versus SAP SE's 4.20x. A PEG below 1.5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Atlassian Corporation (TEAM) trades at 15.8x forward P/E versus 27.8x for SAP SE — 11.9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TEAM: 149.4% to $187.35.

In this comparison, SAP (1.3% yield), CRM (0.9% yield) pay a dividend. TEAM does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, SAP SE (SAP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.86), 1.3% yield, +193.8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SAP: +193.8%, TEAM: +216.1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. SAP, CRM pay a dividend while TEAM does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.