TEX vs MTW

For growth investors, Terex Corporation (TEX) is the stronger pick with 5.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 9% for The Manitowoc Company, Inc. (MTW). Terex Corporation (TEX) offers the better valuation at 19. 3x trailing P/E (13. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Terex Corporation (TEX) a "Hold" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Terex Corporation (TEX) is the cheapest at 19.

3x versus The Manitowoc Company, Inc. at 66. 4x. On forward P/E, Terex Corporation is actually cheaper at 13. 3x.

Over the past 5 years, Terex Corporation (TEX) delivered a total return of +24.

7%, compared to -45. 3% for The Manitowoc Company, Inc. (MTW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TEX returned +201. 5% versus MTW's -44. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Manitowoc Company, Inc.

(MTW) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 94β versus Terex Corporation's 2. 13β — meaning TEX is approximately 10% more volatile than MTW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Manitowoc Company, Inc. (MTW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 84% versus 134% for Terex Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Terex Corporation (TEX) is pulling ahead at 5.

7% versus 2. 9% for The Manitowoc Company, Inc. (MTW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Terex Corporation grew EPS -32. 9% year-over-year, compared to -87. 2% for The Manitowoc Company, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TEX leads at 7. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Terex Corporation (TEX) is the more profitable company, earning 4.

1% net margin versus 0. 3% for The Manitowoc Company, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TEX leads at 8. 8% versus 2. 6% for MTW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TEX leads at 19. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Terex Corporation (TEX) trades at 13.

3x forward P/E versus 19. 0x for The Manitowoc Company, Inc. — 5. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TEX: 24. 9% to $80. 25.

In this comparison, TEX (1.

1% yield) pays a dividend. MTW does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Terex Corporation (TEX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.

1% yield, +201. 5% 10Y return). The Manitowoc Company, Inc. (MTW) carries a higher beta of 1. 94 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TEX: +201. 5%, MTW: -44. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

TEX pays a dividend while MTW does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.