TGB vs SCCO

For growth investors, Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) is the stronger pick with 17.

4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 7% for Taseko Mines Limited (TGB). Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) offers the better valuation at 35. 1x trailing P/E (26. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) a "Hold" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, Taseko Mines Limited is actually cheaper at 13.

6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) delivered a total return of +246.

5%, compared to +188. 5% for Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TGB returned +1265% versus SCCO's +657. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

78β versus Taseko Mines Limited's 1. 80β — meaning TGB is approximately 1% more volatile than SCCO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 67% versus 96% for Taseko Mines Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) is pulling ahead at 17.

4% versus 10. 7% for Taseko Mines Limited (TGB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Southern Copper Corporation grew EPS 24. 5% year-over-year, compared to -104. 2% for Taseko Mines Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, TGB leads at 19. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) is the more profitable company, earning 32.

3% net margin versus -4. 5% for Taseko Mines Limited — meaning it keeps 32. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SCCO leads at 52. 2% versus 20. 5% for TGB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SCCO leads at 56. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) trades at 13.

6x forward P/E versus 26. 0x for Southern Copper Corporation — 12. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SCCO: -15. 0% to $156. 40.

In this comparison, SCCO (1.

6% yield) pays a dividend. TGB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.

6% yield, +657. 5% 10Y return). Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) carries a higher beta of 1. 80 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SCCO: +657. 5%, TGB: +1265%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: TGB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SCCO is a mid-cap high-growth stock. SCCO pays a dividend while TGB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.