TGB vs FCX

For growth investors, Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) is the stronger pick with 10.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 1% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) offers the better valuation at 39. 9x trailing P/E (22. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) a "Buy" — based on 41 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, Taseko Mines Limited is actually cheaper at 13.

1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) delivered a total return of +203.

3%, compared to +44. 3% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TGB returned +1268% versus FCX's +507. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Freeport-McMoRan Inc.

(FCX) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 79β versus Taseko Mines Limited's 1. 80β — meaning TGB is approximately 1% more volatile than FCX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 96% for Taseko Mines Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) is pulling ahead at 10.

7% versus 1. 1% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Freeport-McMoRan Inc. grew EPS 16. 9% year-over-year, compared to -104. 2% for Taseko Mines Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, TGB leads at 19. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Freeport-McMoRan Inc.

(FCX) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 6% net margin versus -4. 5% for Taseko Mines Limited — meaning it keeps 8. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FCX leads at 24. 4% versus 20. 5% for TGB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FCX leads at 27. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) trades at 13.

1x forward P/E versus 22. 4x for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. — 9. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FCX: 10. 5% to $67. 00.

In this comparison, FCX (1.

0% yield) pays a dividend. TGB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Freeport-McMoRan Inc.

(FCX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 0% yield, +507. 7% 10Y return). Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) carries a higher beta of 1. 80 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FCX: +507. 7%, TGB: +1268%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

FCX pays a dividend while TGB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.