Media & Entertainment
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
TGE vs USFD vs SYY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Food Distribution
Food Distribution
TGE vs USFD vs SYY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Media & Entertainment | Food Distribution | Food Distribution |
| Market Cap | $31M | $19.16B | $34.91B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $869M | $39.68B | $83.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $249M | $677M | $1.74B |
| Gross Margin | 77.7% | 17.4% | 18.5% |
| Operating Margin | 40.6% | 3.1% | 3.6% |
| Forward P/E | 1.8x | 18.2x | 15.9x |
| Total Debt | $220M | $5.72B | $14.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $41M | $1.07B |
TGE vs USFD vs SYY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Generation Essentia… (TGE) | 100 | 13.3 | -86.7% |
| US Foods Holding Co… (USFD) | 100 | 112.8 | +12.8% |
| Sysco Corporation (SYY) | 100 | 96.2 | -3.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TGE vs USFD vs SYY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TGE has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in value and quality.
- Lower P/E (1.8x vs 15.9x)
- 28.6% margin vs USFD's 1.7%
- 6.5% ROA vs USFD's 4.8%, ROIC 3.8% vs 9.3%
USFD is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 4.1%, EPS growth 45.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.0%
- 248.8% 10Y total return vs SYY's 82.2%
- 4.1% revenue growth vs TGE's -36.9%
SYY is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.47, yield 2.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.47, current ratio 1.21x
- Beta 0.47, yield 2.8%, current ratio 1.21x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.1% revenue growth vs TGE's -36.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.8x vs 15.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 28.6% margin vs USFD's 1.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs TGE's 2.10 | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield; 37-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +25.7% vs TGE's -89.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.5% ROA vs USFD's 4.8%, ROIC 3.8% vs 9.3% |
TGE vs USFD vs SYY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TGE vs USFD vs SYY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TGE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SYY is the larger business by revenue, generating $83.6B annually — 96.2x TGE's $869M. TGE is the more profitable business, keeping 28.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to USFD's 1.7%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $869M | $39.7B | $83.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $488M | $1.6B | $4.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $249M | $677M | $1.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $454M | $848M | $2.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +77.7% | +17.4% | +18.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +40.6% | +3.1% | +3.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +28.6% | +1.7% | +2.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +52.2% | +2.1% | +2.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.8% | +2.8% | +4.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -18.9% | +6.1% | -13.4% |
Valuation Metrics
TGE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.8x trailing earnings, TGE trades at a 94% valuation discount to USFD's 29.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TGE's 5.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than USFD's 14.7x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $31M | $19.2B | $34.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $231M | $24.8B | $48.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 1.84x | 29.55x | 19.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 18.20x | 15.88x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.36x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.18x | 14.67x | 11.58x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.60x | 0.49x | 0.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.07x | 4.64x | 19.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.72x | 19.98x | 19.60x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — TGE and SYY each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SYY delivers a 80.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $81 in annual profit, vs $14 for TGE. TGE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SYY's 7.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), USFD scores 7/9 vs TGE's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.8% | +15.3% | +80.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.5% | +4.8% | +6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.8% | +9.3% | +15.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.3% | +12.0% | +19.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.29x | 1.33x | 7.81x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $200M | $5.7B | $13.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $41M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $220M | $5.7B | $14.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.48x | 3.94x | 4.35x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
USFD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in USFD five years ago would be worth $21,415 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,046 for TGE. Over the past 12 months, USFD leads with a +25.7% total return vs TGE's -89.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors USFD at 31.2% vs TGE's -52.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.9% | +16.4% | +1.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -89.5% | +25.7% | +6.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.5% | +125.7% | +4.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.5% | +114.1% | -3.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.2% | +248.8% | +82.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -52.9% | +31.2% | +1.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — USFD and SYY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SYY is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TGE's 2.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. USFD currently trades 85.1% from its 52-week high vs TGE's 2.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.10x | 0.50x | 0.47x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $37.02 | $102.13 | $91.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.78 | $66.89 | $68.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +2.8% | +85.1% | +79.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.2 | 51.0 | 41.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 52K | 2.2M | 4.7M |
Analyst Outlook
SYY leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: USFD as "Buy", SYY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 24.7% upside for USFD (target: $108) vs 24.1% for SYY (target: $90). SYY is the only dividend payer here at 2.80% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $108.33 | $90.44 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 25 | 30 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 37 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.1% | +3.6% |
TGE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). USFD leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
TGE vs USFD vs SYY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TGE or USFD or SYY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, US Foods Holding Corp.
(USFD) is the stronger pick with 4. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -36. 9% for Generation Essentials Group (TGE). Generation Essentials Group (TGE) offers the better valuation at 1. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate US Foods Holding Corp. (USFD) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TGE or USFD or SYY?
On trailing P/E, Generation Essentials Group (TGE) is the cheapest at 1.
8x versus US Foods Holding Corp. at 29. 6x. On forward P/E, Sysco Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TGE or USFD or SYY?
Over the past 5 years, US Foods Holding Corp.
(USFD) delivered a total return of +114. 1%, compared to -89. 5% for Generation Essentials Group (TGE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: USFD returned +248. 8% versus TGE's -95. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TGE or USFD or SYY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sysco Corporation (SYY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
47β versus Generation Essentials Group's 2. 10β — meaning TGE is approximately 347% more volatile than SYY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Generation Essentials Group (TGE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 8% for Sysco Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TGE or USFD or SYY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), US Foods Holding Corp.
(USFD) is pulling ahead at 4. 1% versus -36. 9% for Generation Essentials Group (TGE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Generation Essentials Group grew EPS 235. 3% year-over-year, compared to -4. 1% for Sysco Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, SYY leads at 5. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TGE or USFD or SYY?
Generation Essentials Group (TGE) is the more profitable company, earning 54.
8% net margin versus 1. 7% for US Foods Holding Corp. — meaning it keeps 54. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TGE leads at 64. 7% versus 3. 1% for USFD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TGE leads at 46. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TGE or USFD or SYY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sysco Corporation (SYY) trades at 15.
9x forward P/E versus 18. 2x for US Foods Holding Corp. — 2. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for USFD: 24. 7% to $108. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — TGE or USFD or SYY?
In this comparison, SYY (2.
8% yield) pays a dividend. TGE, USFD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TGE or USFD or SYY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sysco Corporation (SYY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
47), 2. 8% yield). Generation Essentials Group (TGE) carries a higher beta of 2. 10 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SYY: +82. 2%, TGE: -95. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TGE and USFD and SYY?
These companies operate in different sectors (TGE (Technology) and USFD (Consumer Defensive) and SYY (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TGE is a small-cap deep-value stock; USFD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SYY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. SYY pays a dividend while TGE, USFD do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.