TIC vs ULS vs TISI

For growth investors, TIC Solutions, Inc.

(TIC) is the stronger pick with 39. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 2% for Team, Inc. (TISI). UL Solutions Inc. (ULS) offers the better valuation at 62. 1x trailing P/E (45. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate UL Solutions Inc. (ULS) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, UL Solutions Inc.

is actually cheaper at 45. 5x.

Over the past 5 years, UL Solutions Inc.

(ULS) delivered a total return of +187. 3%, compared to -80. 6% for Team, Inc. (TISI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ULS returned +187. 3% versus TISI's -93. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Team, Inc.

(TISI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 47β versus TIC Solutions, Inc. 's 1. 65β — meaning TIC is approximately 251% more volatile than TISI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, UL Solutions Inc. (ULS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 64% versus 212% for Team, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), TIC Solutions, Inc.

(TIC) is pulling ahead at 39. 4% versus -1. 2% for Team, Inc. (TISI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Team, Inc. grew EPS 50. 1% year-over-year, compared to -353. 8% for TIC Solutions, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ULS leads at 6. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

UL Solutions Inc.

(ULS) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 6% net margin versus -5. 7% for TIC Solutions, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ULS leads at 17. 1% versus 0. 6% for TIC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ULS leads at 49. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, UL Solutions Inc.

(ULS) trades at 45. 5x forward P/E versus 70. 4x for TIC Solutions, Inc. — 25. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TIC: 49. 9% to $15. 00.

In this comparison, ULS (0.

5% yield) pays a dividend. TIC, TISI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, UL Solutions Inc.

(ULS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 0. 5% yield, +187. 3% 10Y return). TIC Solutions, Inc. (TIC) carries a higher beta of 1. 65 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ULS: +187. 3%, TIC: -16. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: TIC is a small-cap high-growth stock; ULS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TISI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. ULS pays a dividend while TIC, TISI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.