Software - Application
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
TRAK vs VRNT vs SSYS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Computer Hardware
TRAK vs VRNT vs SSYS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Computer Hardware |
| Market Cap | $185M | $1.24B | $707M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $24M | $894M | $551M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $61M | $-104M |
| Gross Margin | 85.0% | 69.9% | 43.6% |
| Operating Margin | 30.2% | 8.6% | -11.7% |
| Forward P/E | 27.8x | 7.0x | 69.8x |
| Total Debt | $510K | $448M | $27M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $29M | $216M | $95M |
TRAK vs VRNT vs SSYS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ReposiTrak, Inc. (TRAK) | 100 | 198.3 | +98.3% |
| Verint Systems Inc. (VRNT) | 100 | 43.7 | -56.3% |
| Stratasys Ltd. (SSYS) | 100 | 45.9 | -54.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TRAK vs VRNT vs SSYS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TRAK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.15, yield 0.9%
- Rev growth 10.5%, EPS growth 20.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.8%
- 14.5% 10Y total return vs VRNT's -37.1%
VRNT is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.36 vs TRAK's 0.81
- Lower P/E (7.0x vs 69.8x)
- 1.6% yield, vs TRAK's 0.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
SSYS plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.5% revenue growth vs SSYS's -3.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.0x vs 69.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.9% margin vs SSYS's -18.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.15 vs SSYS's 1.79, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.6% yield, vs TRAK's 0.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +17.9% vs TRAK's -52.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.9% ROA vs SSYS's -9.6%, ROIC 21.4% vs -5.8% |
TRAK vs VRNT vs SSYS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TRAK vs VRNT vs SSYS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TRAK leads in 3 of 6 categories
VRNT leads 1 • SSYS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRAK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VRNT is the larger business by revenue, generating $894M annually — 38.0x TRAK's $24M. TRAK is the more profitable business, keeping 30.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SSYS's -18.9%. On growth, TRAK holds the edge at +6.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $24M | $894M | $551M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $8M | $127M | -$32M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | $61M | -$104M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $7M | $118M | -$8M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +85.0% | +69.9% | +43.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +30.2% | +8.6% | -11.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +30.9% | +6.9% | -18.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +29.1% | +13.2% | -1.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.7% | -1.0% | -6.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.2% | -5.1% | +62.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — VRNT and SSYS each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.7x trailing earnings, VRNT trades at a 32% valuation discount to TRAK's 29.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TRAK offers better value at 0.85x vs VRNT's 1.02x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $185M | $1.2B | $707M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $157M | $1.5B | $639M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 29.01x | 19.72x | -6.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 27.82x | 7.00x | 69.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.85x | 1.02x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.98x | 9.46x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.18x | 1.37x | 1.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.93x | 0.97x | 0.79x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.01x | 8.75x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
TRAK leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TRAK delivers a 14.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-12 for SSYS. TRAK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VRNT's 0.34x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TRAK scores 7/9 vs SSYS's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.6% | +4.6% | -12.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.9% | +2.8% | -9.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +21.4% | +5.3% | -5.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.9% | +5.9% | -6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.34x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$28M | $233M | -$68M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $29M | $216M | $95M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $509,973 | $448M | $27M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 165.50x | 8.24x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TRAK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRAK five years ago would be worth $21,031 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,090 for SSYS. Over the past 12 months, VRNT leads with a +17.9% total return vs TRAK's -52.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRAK at 17.7% vs SSYS's -17.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.1% | — | -9.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -52.5% | +17.9% | -15.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +63.0% | -39.3% | -42.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +110.3% | -56.1% | -59.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +14.5% | -37.1% | -60.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.7% | -15.3% | -17.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TRAK and VRNT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TRAK is the less volatile stock with a 1.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SSYS's 1.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VRNT currently trades 89.8% from its 52-week high vs TRAK's 42.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.15x | 1.26x | 1.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.72 | $22.84 | $12.81 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.94 | $16.23 | $7.34 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +42.8% | +89.8% | +64.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.8 | 68.4 | 64.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 161K | 0 | 818K |
Analyst Outlook
VRNT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TRAK as "Buy", VRNT as "Hold", SSYS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 136.3% upside for TRAK (target: $24) vs 58.8% for VRNT (target: $33). For income investors, VRNT offers the higher dividend yield at 1.56% vs TRAK's 0.85%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $24.00 | $32.57 | $13.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 16 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.9% | +1.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.09 | $0.32 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.7% | +5.8% | 0.0% |
TRAK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). VRNT leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
TRAK vs VRNT vs SSYS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TRAK or VRNT or SSYS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ReposiTrak, Inc.
(TRAK) is the stronger pick with 10. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 7% for Stratasys Ltd. (SSYS). Verint Systems Inc. (VRNT) offers the better valuation at 19. 7x trailing P/E (7. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ReposiTrak, Inc. (TRAK) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TRAK or VRNT or SSYS?
On trailing P/E, Verint Systems Inc.
(VRNT) is the cheapest at 19. 7x versus ReposiTrak, Inc. at 29. 0x. On forward P/E, Verint Systems Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Verint Systems Inc. wins at 0. 36x versus ReposiTrak, Inc. 's 0. 81x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TRAK or VRNT or SSYS?
Over the past 5 years, ReposiTrak, Inc.
(TRAK) delivered a total return of +110. 3%, compared to -59. 1% for Stratasys Ltd. (SSYS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRAK returned +14. 5% versus SSYS's -60. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TRAK or VRNT or SSYS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ReposiTrak, Inc.
(TRAK) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 15β versus Stratasys Ltd. 's 1. 79β — meaning SSYS is approximately 55% more volatile than TRAK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ReposiTrak, Inc. (TRAK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 34% for Verint Systems Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TRAK or VRNT or SSYS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ReposiTrak, Inc.
(TRAK) is pulling ahead at 10. 5% versus -3. 7% for Stratasys Ltd. (SSYS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Verint Systems Inc. grew EPS 271. 4% year-over-year, compared to 20. 7% for ReposiTrak, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TRAK leads at 7. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TRAK or VRNT or SSYS?
ReposiTrak, Inc.
(TRAK) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 9% net margin versus -18. 9% for Stratasys Ltd. — meaning it keeps 30. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRAK leads at 27. 5% versus -10. 7% for SSYS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRAK leads at 83. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TRAK or VRNT or SSYS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Verint Systems Inc. (VRNT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 36x versus ReposiTrak, Inc. 's 0. 81x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Verint Systems Inc. (VRNT) trades at 7. 0x forward P/E versus 69. 8x for Stratasys Ltd. — 62. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TRAK: 136. 3% to $24. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TRAK or VRNT or SSYS?
In this comparison, VRNT (1.
6% yield), TRAK (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. SSYS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TRAK or VRNT or SSYS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ReposiTrak, Inc.
(TRAK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 15), 0. 9% yield). Stratasys Ltd. (SSYS) carries a higher beta of 1. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TRAK: +14. 5%, SSYS: -60. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TRAK and VRNT and SSYS?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
TRAK, VRNT pay a dividend while SSYS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.