Solar
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
TURB vs SHLS vs SPWR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Solar
Solar
TURB vs SHLS vs SPWR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Solar | Solar | Solar |
| Market Cap | $3M | $1.48B | $925M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9M | $536M | $315M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $34M | $-42M |
| Gross Margin | 3.6% | 33.5% | 50.4% |
| Operating Margin | -42.2% | 11.2% | -2.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 21.5x | 5.5x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $175M | $188M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $7M | $10M |
TURB vs SHLS vs SPWR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Turbo Energy, S.A. … (TURB) | 100 | 55.0 | -45.0% |
| Shoals Technologies… (SHLS) | 100 | 48.4 | -51.6% |
| SunPower Inc. (SPWR) | 100 | 52.9 | -47.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TURB vs SHLS vs SPWR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TURB plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
SHLS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 19.1%, EPS growth 42.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.3%
- -71.5% 10Y total return vs TURB's -73.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.23, Low D/E 29.2%, current ratio 2.03x
SPWR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.15
- Lower P/E (5.5x vs 21.5x)
- Beta 2.15 vs SHLS's 2.23
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.1% revenue growth vs TURB's -28.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.5x vs 21.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.3% margin vs TURB's -35.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.15 vs SHLS's 2.23 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 3 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +83.4% vs TURB's -49.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.7% ROA vs TURB's -23.9%, ROIC 5.9% vs -42.0% |
TURB vs SHLS vs SPWR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TURB vs SHLS vs SPWR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SHLS leads in 4 of 6 categories
TURB leads 0 • SPWR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SHLS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SHLS is the larger business by revenue, generating $536M annually — 56.9x TURB's $9M. SHLS is the more profitable business, keeping 6.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TURB's -35.4%. On growth, SHLS holds the edge at +74.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $9M | $536M | $315M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $73M | -$6M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $34M | -$42M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$77M | -$15M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +3.6% | +33.5% | +50.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -42.2% | +11.2% | -2.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -35.4% | +6.3% | -13.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.7% | -14.5% | -4.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -63.2% | +74.9% | -0.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.6% | — | -101.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — TURB and SPWR each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $1.5B | $925M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6M | $1.7B | $1.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.76x | 44.20x | -16.29x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 21.48x | 5.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 25.41x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.27x | 3.12x | 3.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.95x | 2.48x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SHLS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SHLS delivers a 5.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-85 for TURB. SHLS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TURB's 2.01x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SHLS scores 5/9 vs TURB's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -84.7% | +5.7% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -23.9% | +3.7% | -19.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -42.0% | +5.9% | -5.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -89.9% | +7.6% | -7.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.01x | 0.29x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3M | $168M | $179M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $7M | $10M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $175M | $188M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -10.39x | 5.91x | -1.57x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SHLS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SHLS five years ago would be worth $3,005 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,000 for SPWR. Over the past 12 months, SHLS leads with a +83.4% total return vs TURB's -49.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SHLS at -23.5% vs SPWR's -41.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +33.3% | -2.8% | -33.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -49.6% | +83.4% | -37.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.5% | -55.2% | -80.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.5% | -70.0% | -80.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.5% | -71.5% | -80.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -35.7% | -23.5% | -41.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TURB and SHLS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TURB is the less volatile stock with a -1.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SHLS's 2.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SHLS currently trades 77.8% from its 52-week high vs TURB's 6.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -1.42x | 2.23x | 2.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.45 | $11.36 | $2.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.57 | $3.81 | $0.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +6.5% | +77.8% | +48.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.6 | 54.8 | 45.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7.2M | 5.1M | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
SHLS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SHLS as "Buy", SPWR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 1350.5% upside for SPWR (target: $16) vs -1.0% for SHLS (target: $9).
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $8.75 | $15.81 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 23 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 3 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% | 0.0% |
SHLS leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
TURB vs SHLS vs SPWR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TURB or SHLS or SPWR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
(SHLS) is the stronger pick with 19. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -28. 1% for Turbo Energy, S. A. American Depositary Shares (TURB). Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. (SHLS) offers the better valuation at 44. 2x trailing P/E (21. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. (SHLS) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TURB or SHLS or SPWR?
On forward P/E, SunPower Inc.
is actually cheaper at 5. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TURB or SHLS or SPWR?
Over the past 5 years, Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
(SHLS) delivered a total return of -70. 0%, compared to -80. 0% for SunPower Inc. (SPWR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SHLS returned -71. 5% versus SPWR's -80. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TURB or SHLS or SPWR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Turbo Energy, S.
A. American Depositary Shares (TURB) is the lower-risk stock at -1. 42β versus Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. 's 2. 23β — meaning SHLS is approximately -257% more volatile than TURB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. (SHLS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 2% for Turbo Energy, S. A. American Depositary Shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TURB or SHLS or SPWR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
(SHLS) is pulling ahead at 19. 1% versus -28. 1% for Turbo Energy, S. A. American Depositary Shares (TURB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. grew EPS 42. 9% year-over-year, compared to -50. 0% for Turbo Energy, S. A. American Depositary Shares. Over a 3-year CAGR, SPWR leads at 65. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TURB or SHLS or SPWR?
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
(SHLS) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 1% net margin versus -35. 4% for Turbo Energy, S. A. American Depositary Shares — meaning it keeps 7. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SHLS leads at 11. 9% versus -42. 2% for TURB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPWR leads at 48. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TURB or SHLS or SPWR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, SunPower Inc.
(SPWR) trades at 5. 5x forward P/E versus 21. 5x for Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. — 16. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SPWR: 1350. 5% to $15. 81.
08Which pays a better dividend — TURB or SHLS or SPWR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is TURB or SHLS or SPWR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Turbo Energy, S.
A. American Depositary Shares (TURB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -1. 42)). SunPower Inc. (SPWR) carries a higher beta of 2. 15 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TURB: -73. 5%, SPWR: -80. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TURB and SHLS and SPWR?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TURB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SHLS is a small-cap high-growth stock; SPWR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.