Telecommunications Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TV vs TLN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Independent Power Producers
TV vs TLN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Independent Power Producers |
| Market Cap | $1.53B | $17.66B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $58.64B | $3.02B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-8.70B | $-21M |
| Gross Margin | 38.2% | 35.2% |
| Operating Margin | 8.0% | 8.1% |
| Forward P/E | 1.2x | 16.9x |
| Total Debt | $91.58B | $6.81B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $36.43B | $752M |
TV vs TLN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grupo Televisa, S.A… (TV) | 100 | 55.6 | -44.4% |
| Talen Energy Corpor… (TLN) | 100 | 770.4 | +670.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TV vs TLN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TV is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.63, yield 4.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.63, Low D/E 88.9%, current ratio 2.12x
- Beta 0.63, yield 4.4%, current ratio 2.12x
TLN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 21.8%, EPS growth -127.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.5%
- 7.3% 10Y total return vs TV's -84.4%
- 21.8% revenue growth vs TV's -11.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.8% revenue growth vs TV's -11.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.2x vs 16.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | -0.7% margin vs TV's -14.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.63 vs TLN's 1.61, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.4% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +69.0% vs TV's +62.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -0.2% ROA vs TV's -3.7%, ROIC -0.9% vs 2.0% |
TV vs TLN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TV vs TLN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TLN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TV is the larger business by revenue, generating $58.6B annually — 19.4x TLN's $3.0B. TLN is the more profitable business, keeping -0.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TV's -14.8%. On growth, TLN holds the edge at +78.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $58.6B | $3.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $18.8B | $396M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$8.7B | -$21M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4.8B | -$2.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.2% | +35.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.0% | +8.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -14.8% | -0.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.2% | -93.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.0% | +78.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.5% | +145.2% |
Valuation Metrics
TV leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, TV's 4.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TLN's 114.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.5B | $17.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.7B | $23.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.60x | -80.66x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 1.17x | 16.90x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.96x | 114.01x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.48x | 6.99x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.21x | 16.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.71x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
TV leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TLN delivers a -1.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-2 in annual profit, vs $-8 for TV. TV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.89x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TLN's 6.23x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TV scores 5/9 vs TLN's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -7.9% | -1.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.7% | -0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.0% | -0.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.1% | -0.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.89x | 6.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $55.1B | $6.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $36.4B | $752M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $91.6B | $6.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.64x | 0.45x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TLN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TLN five years ago would be worth $83,090 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,989 for TV. Over the past 12 months, TLN leads with a +69.0% total return vs TV's +62.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TLN at 102.5% vs TV's -9.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.4% | -2.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +62.5% | +69.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -25.9% | +730.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.1% | +730.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.4% | +730.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -9.5% | +102.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TV and TLN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TV is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TLN's 1.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TLN currently trades 85.6% from its 52-week high vs TV's 81.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.63x | 1.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.49 | $451.28 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.76 | $220.59 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.7% | +85.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.1 | 61.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 714K |
Analyst Outlook
TV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TV as "Hold" and TLN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 250.9% upside for TV (target: $10) vs 23.1% for TLN (target: $476). TV is the only dividend payer here at 4.42% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.00 | $475.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.17 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.1% | +0.6% |
TV leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). TLN leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). 1 tied.
TV vs TLN: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TV or TLN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Talen Energy Corporation (TLN) is the stronger pick with 21.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 3% for Grupo Televisa, S. A. B. (TV). Analysts rate Talen Energy Corporation (TLN) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — TV or TLN?
Over the past 5 years, Talen Energy Corporation (TLN) delivered a total return of +730.
9%, compared to -70. 1% for Grupo Televisa, S. A. B. (TV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TLN returned +730. 9% versus TV's -84. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — TV or TLN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Grupo Televisa, S.
A. B. (TV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 63β versus Talen Energy Corporation's 1. 61β — meaning TLN is approximately 155% more volatile than TV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Grupo Televisa, S. A. B. (TV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 89% versus 6% for Talen Energy Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — TV or TLN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Talen Energy Corporation (TLN) is pulling ahead at 21.
8% versus -11. 3% for Grupo Televisa, S. A. B. (TV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Grupo Televisa, S. A. B. grew EPS -23. 9% year-over-year, compared to -127. 1% for Talen Energy Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, TLN leads at 1. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — TV or TLN?
Talen Energy Corporation (TLN) is the more profitable company, earning -8.
7% net margin versus -15. 0% for Grupo Televisa, S. A. B. — meaning it keeps -8. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TV leads at 8. 2% versus -2. 8% for TLN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TLN leads at 49. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is TV or TLN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Grupo Televisa, S.
A. B. (TV) trades at 1. 2x forward P/E versus 16. 9x for Talen Energy Corporation — 15. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TV: 250. 9% to $10. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — TV or TLN?
In this comparison, TV (4.
4% yield) pays a dividend. TLN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is TV or TLN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Grupo Televisa, S.
A. B. (TV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 63), 4. 4% yield). Talen Energy Corporation (TLN) carries a higher beta of 1. 61 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TV: -84. 4%, TLN: +730. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between TV and TLN?
These companies operate in different sectors (TV (Communication Services) and TLN (Utilities)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TV is a small-cap income-oriented stock; TLN is a mid-cap high-growth stock. TV pays a dividend while TLN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 22%
- Dividend Yield > 1.7%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.