TZOO vs EXPE

For growth investors, Travelzoo (TZOO) is the stronger pick with 9.

3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 6% for Expedia Group, Inc. (EXPE). Travelzoo (TZOO) offers the better valuation at 22. 8x trailing P/E (13. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Travelzoo (TZOO) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Travelzoo (TZOO) is the cheapest at 22.

8x versus Expedia Group, Inc. at 25. 8x. On forward P/E, Expedia Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Expedia Group, Inc.

(EXPE) delivered a total return of +46. 9%, compared to -46. 5% for Travelzoo (TZOO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EXPE returned +130. 6% versus TZOO's +18. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Travelzoo (TZOO) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

30β versus Expedia Group, Inc. 's 1. 47β — meaning EXPE is approximately 13% more volatile than TZOO relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Travelzoo (TZOO) is pulling ahead at 9.

3% versus 7. 6% for Expedia Group, Inc. (EXPE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Expedia Group, Inc. grew EPS 9. 6% year-over-year, compared to -61. 3% for Travelzoo. Over a 3-year CAGR, TZOO leads at 9. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Expedia Group, Inc.

(EXPE) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 8% net margin versus 5. 1% for Travelzoo — meaning it keeps 8. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EXPE leads at 13. 4% versus 7. 5% for TZOO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EXPE leads at 84. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Expedia Group, Inc.

(EXPE) trades at 13. 0x forward P/E versus 13. 4x for Travelzoo — 0. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EXPE: 7. 7% to $272. 35.

In this comparison, EXPE (0.

6% yield) pays a dividend. TZOO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Expedia Group, Inc.

(EXPE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0. 6% yield, +130. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EXPE: +130. 6%, TZOO: +18. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (TZOO (Communication Services) and EXPE (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

EXPE pays a dividend while TZOO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.