UCFIW
CN Healthy Food Tech Group Corp.
Financial - Capital Markets
Market Cap—
5Y Perf.+5.0%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
UCFIW vs GFAI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
GFAI
Guardforce AI Co., Limited
Security & Protection Services
Market Cap$10M
5Y Perf.-65.9%
UCFIW vs GFAI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | UCFIW | GFAI |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Capital Markets | Security & Protection Services |
| Market Cap | — | $10M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $11M | $72M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4M | $-24M |
| Gross Margin | 66.5% | 15.1% |
| Operating Margin | 48.8% | -27.4% |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $3M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $41M | $22M |
Quick Verdict: UCFIW vs GFAI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: UCFIW leads in 3 of 4 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
UCFIW
CN Healthy Food Tech Group Corp.
The Banking Pick
UCFIW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 27.8% 10Y total return vs GFAI's -99.5%
- 35.2% margin vs GFAI's -32.9%
- +27.8% vs GFAI's -53.2%
Best for: long-term compounding
GFAI
Guardforce AI Co., Limited
The Defensive Pick
GFAI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.31, Low D/E 8.1%, current ratio 4.92x
- Beta 2.31, current ratio 4.92x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Quality / Margins | UCFIW | 35.2% margin vs GFAI's -32.9% |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | UCFIW | +27.8% vs GFAI's -53.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | UCFIW | 7.9% ROA vs GFAI's -50.2%, ROIC 38.4% vs -41.6% |
UCFIW vs GFAI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLUCFIWLAGGINGGFAI
GFAIGuardforce AI Co., Li…
0leads
UCFIWCN Healthy Food Tech …
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs GFAIMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
UCFIW4/4
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
—
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
UCFIW7/7
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
UCFIW5/5
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
UCFIW1/1
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UCFIW leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GFAI is the larger business by revenue, generating $72M annually — 6.4x UCFIW's $11M. UCFIW is the more profitable business, keeping 35.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GFAI's -32.9%.
| Metric | UCFIWCN Healthy Food T… | GFAIGuardforce AI Co.… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $11M | $72M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | -$12M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$24M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$6M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.5% | +15.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +48.8% | -27.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +35.2% | -32.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.7% | -8.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +3.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +38.9% |
UCFIW leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | UCFIWCN Healthy Food T… | GFAIGuardforce AI Co.… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | — | $10M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | — | -$9M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | -0.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.16x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Profitability & Efficiency
UCFIW leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UCFIW delivers a 37.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $37 in annual profit, vs $-70 for GFAI. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UCFIW scores 7/9 vs GFAI's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | UCFIWCN Healthy Food T… | GFAIGuardforce AI Co.… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +37.0% | -69.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.9% | -50.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +38.4% | -41.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +51.3% | -19.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$41M | -$19M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $41M | $22M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $3M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -167.24x |
UCFIW leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
UCFIW leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in UCFIW five years ago would be worth $12,784 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $46 for GFAI. Over the past 12 months, UCFIW leads with a +27.8% total return vs GFAI's -53.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UCFIW at 8.5% vs GFAI's -60.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | UCFIWCN Healthy Food T… | GFAIGuardforce AI Co.… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | — | -26.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +27.8% | -53.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +27.8% | -93.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +27.8% | -99.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +27.8% | -99.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.5% | -60.4% |
UCFIW leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
UCFIW leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Risk & Volatility
UCFIW currently trades 56.3% from its 52-week high vs GFAI's 31.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | UCFIWCN Healthy Food T… | GFAIGuardforce AI Co.… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | — | 2.31x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.16 | $1.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.06 | $0.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +56.3% | +31.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | — | 47.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 148K | 378K |
UCFIW leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | UCFIWCN Healthy Food T… | GFAIGuardforce AI Co.… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | — | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
UCFIW leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency.
Best OverallCN Healthy Food Tech Group … (UCFIW)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
UCFIW vs GFAI: Frequently Asked Questions
5 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Which is the better long-term investment — UCFIW or GFAI?
Over the past 5 years, CN Healthy Food Tech Group Corp.
(UCFIW) delivered a total return of +27. 8%, compared to -99. 5% for Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UCFIW returned +27. 8% versus GFAI's -99. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
02Which has better profit margins — UCFIW or GFAI?
CN Healthy Food Tech Group Corp.
(UCFIW) is the more profitable company, earning 35. 2% net margin versus -16. 1% for Guardforce AI Co. , Limited — meaning it keeps 35. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UCFIW leads at 48. 8% versus -18. 5% for GFAI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UCFIW leads at 66. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
03Which pays a better dividend — UCFIW or GFAI?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
04Is UCFIW or GFAI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CN Healthy Food Tech Group Corp.
(UCFIW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI) carries a higher beta of 2. 31 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (UCFIW: +27. 8%, GFAI: -99. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
05What are the main differences between UCFIW and GFAI?
These companies operate in different sectors (UCFIW (Financial Services) and GFAI (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Closest Rival
Compare GFAI vs BCO
BCO is one of the most direct listed alternatives to GFAI.
Segment Rival
Compare UCFIW vs BYFC
BYFC overlaps with UCFIW in an adjacent operating segment worth comparing.
Expand Peer Set
Expand With BCO + VRRM
BCO and VRRM are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.