UHS vs CYH

For growth investors, Universal Health Services, Inc.

(UHS) is the stronger pick with 9. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 2% for Community Health Systems, Inc. (CYH). Community Health Systems, Inc. (CYH) offers the better valuation at 0. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) a "Hold" — based on 43 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Community Health Systems, Inc.

(CYH) is the cheapest at 0. 8x versus Universal Health Services, Inc. at 7. 4x.

Over the past 5 years, Universal Health Services, Inc.

(UHS) delivered a total return of +12. 5%, compared to -81. 0% for Community Health Systems, Inc. (CYH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UHS returned +30. 8% versus CYH's -80. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Universal Health Services, Inc.

(UHS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 60β versus Community Health Systems, Inc. 's 1. 60β — meaning CYH is approximately 166% more volatile than UHS relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Universal Health Services, Inc.

(UHS) is pulling ahead at 9. 7% versus -1. 2% for Community Health Systems, Inc. (CYH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Community Health Systems, Inc. grew EPS 196. 7% year-over-year, compared to 37. 3% for Universal Health Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, UHS leads at 9. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Universal Health Services, Inc.

(UHS) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 6% net margin versus 4. 1% for Community Health Systems, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UHS leads at 11. 5% versus -79. 4% for CYH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UHS leads at 90. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UHS: 35.

7% to $231. 50.

In this comparison, UHS (0.

5% yield) pays a dividend. CYH does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Universal Health Services, Inc.

(UHS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 60)). Community Health Systems, Inc. (CYH) carries a higher beta of 1. 60 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (UHS: +30. 8%, CYH: -80. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.