Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

UPBD vs FCFS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
UPBD
Upbound Group, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.10B
5Y Perf.-25.3%
FCFS
FirstCash Holdings, Inc

Financial - Credit Services

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$9.99B
5Y Perf.+224.5%

UPBD vs FCFS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
UPBD logoUPBD
FCFS logoFCFS
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationFinancial - Credit Services
Market Cap$1.10B$9.99B
Revenue (TTM)$4.74B$3.66B
Net Income (TTM)$84M$354M
Gross Margin45.2%51.7%
Operating Margin5.0%15.4%
Forward P/E4.5x21.0x
Total Debt$1.86B$2.82B
Cash & Equiv.$121M$125M

UPBD vs FCFSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

UPBD
FCFS
StockMay 20May 26Return
Upbound Group, Inc. (UPBD)10074.7-25.3%
FirstCash Holdings,… (FCFS)100324.5+224.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: UPBD vs FCFS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FCFS leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Upbound Group, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
UPBD
Upbound Group, Inc.
The Growth Play

UPBD is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 8.7%, EPS growth -43.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.4%
  • 8.7% revenue growth vs FCFS's 8.0%
  • Lower P/E (4.5x vs 21.0x)
Best for: growth exposure
FCFS
FirstCash Holdings, Inc
The Banking Pick

FCFS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 0.31, yield 0.7%
  • 401.1% 10Y total return vs UPBD's 104.4%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.31, current ratio 4.55x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthUPBD logoUPBD8.7% revenue growth vs FCFS's 8.0%
ValueUPBD logoUPBDLower P/E (4.5x vs 21.0x)
Quality / MarginsFCFS logoFCFS9.0% margin vs UPBD's 1.8%
Stability / SafetyFCFS logoFCFSBeta 0.31 vs UPBD's 1.89, lower leverage
DividendsUPBD logoUPBD7.9% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FCFS's 0.7%
Momentum (1Y)FCFS logoFCFS+69.9% vs UPBD's -11.8%
Efficiency (ROA)FCFS logoFCFS7.0% ROA vs UPBD's 2.7%, ROIC 9.2% vs 7.3%

UPBD vs FCFS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

UPBDUpbound Group, Inc.
FY 2025
Acima
100.0%$2.5B
FCFSFirstCash Holdings, Inc
FY 2025
US Pawn Segment
66.8%$1.8B
Retail POS Payment Solutions
33.2%$870M

UPBD vs FCFS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFCFSLAGGINGUPBD

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FCFS leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

UPBD and FCFS operate at a comparable scale, with $4.7B and $3.7B in trailing revenue. FCFS is the more profitable business, keeping 9.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UPBD's 1.8%.

MetricUPBD logoUPBDUpbound Group, In…FCFS logoFCFSFirstCash Holding…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$4.7B$3.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$1.0B$950M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$84M$354M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$349M$553M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+45.2%+51.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+5.0%+15.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+1.8%+9.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+7.4%+12.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+3.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+45.2%+29.9%
FCFS leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

UPBD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 15.2x trailing earnings, UPBD trades at a 50% valuation discount to FCFS's 30.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, UPBD's 10.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FCFS's 12.8x.

MetricUPBD logoUPBDUpbound Group, In…FCFS logoFCFSFirstCash Holding…
Market CapShares × price$1.1B$10.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$2.8B$12.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS15.21x30.51x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.4.53x21.03x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.29x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple10.32x12.77x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.24x2.73x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.60x4.43x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF4.63x21.30x
UPBD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FCFS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

FCFS delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $12 for UPBD. FCFS carries lower financial leverage with a 1.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UPBD's 2.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FCFS scores 7/9 vs UPBD's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricUPBD logoUPBDUpbound Group, In…FCFS logoFCFSFirstCash Holding…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+12.1%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+2.7%+7.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+7.3%+9.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+9.5%+12.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–947
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage2.67x1.24x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$1.7B$2.7B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$121M$125M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.9B$2.8B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.41x4.72x
FCFS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FCFS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FCFS five years ago would be worth $31,559 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,495 for UPBD. Over the past 12 months, FCFS leads with a +69.9% total return vs UPBD's -11.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FCFS at 30.6% vs UPBD's -9.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricUPBD logoUPBDUpbound Group, In…FCFS logoFCFSFirstCash Holding…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+11.8%+44.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-11.8%+69.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-25.0%+122.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-55.0%+215.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+104.4%+401.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-9.1%+30.6%
FCFS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

FCFS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

FCFS is the less volatile stock with a 0.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UPBD's 1.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FCFS currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs UPBD's 67.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricUPBD logoUPBDUpbound Group, In…FCFS logoFCFSFirstCash Holding…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.89x0.31x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$28.03$227.42
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$15.82$119.21
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+67.8%+99.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10047.172.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded845K340K
FCFS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — UPBD and FCFS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates UPBD as "Buy" and FCFS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 108.7% upside for UPBD (target: $40) vs 11.3% for FCFS (target: $252). For income investors, UPBD offers the higher dividend yield at 7.89% vs FCFS's 0.70%.

MetricUPBD logoUPBDUpbound Group, In…FCFS logoFCFSFirstCash Holding…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$39.67$252.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts2019
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+7.9%+0.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises110
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.50$1.59
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.2%
Evenly matched — UPBD and FCFS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

FCFS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). UPBD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallFirstCash Holdings, Inc (FCFS)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

UPBD vs FCFS: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is UPBD or FCFS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Upbound Group, Inc.

(UPBD) is the stronger pick with 8. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 0% for FirstCash Holdings, Inc (FCFS). Upbound Group, Inc. (UPBD) offers the better valuation at 15. 2x trailing P/E (4. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Upbound Group, Inc. (UPBD) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — UPBD or FCFS?

On trailing P/E, Upbound Group, Inc.

(UPBD) is the cheapest at 15. 2x versus FirstCash Holdings, Inc at 30. 5x. On forward P/E, Upbound Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 4. 5x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — UPBD or FCFS?

Over the past 5 years, FirstCash Holdings, Inc (FCFS) delivered a total return of +215.

6%, compared to -55. 0% for Upbound Group, Inc. (UPBD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FCFS returned +401. 1% versus UPBD's +104. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — UPBD or FCFS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), FirstCash Holdings, Inc (FCFS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

31β versus Upbound Group, Inc. 's 1. 89β — meaning UPBD is approximately 513% more volatile than FCFS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, FirstCash Holdings, Inc (FCFS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 124% versus 3% for Upbound Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — UPBD or FCFS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Upbound Group, Inc.

(UPBD) is pulling ahead at 8. 7% versus 8. 0% for FirstCash Holdings, Inc (FCFS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FirstCash Holdings, Inc grew EPS 29. 5% year-over-year, compared to -43. 4% for Upbound Group, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — UPBD or FCFS?

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (FCFS) is the more profitable company, earning 9.

0% net margin versus 1. 6% for Upbound Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FCFS leads at 15. 4% versus 4. 8% for UPBD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FCFS leads at 51. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is UPBD or FCFS more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Upbound Group, Inc.

(UPBD) trades at 4. 5x forward P/E versus 21. 0x for FirstCash Holdings, Inc — 16. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UPBD: 108. 7% to $39. 67.

08

Which pays a better dividend — UPBD or FCFS?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Upbound Group, Inc. (UPBD) offers the highest yield at 7. 9%, versus 0. 7% for FirstCash Holdings, Inc (FCFS).

09

Is UPBD or FCFS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, FirstCash Holdings, Inc (FCFS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

31), 0. 7% yield, +401. 1% 10Y return). Upbound Group, Inc. (UPBD) carries a higher beta of 1. 89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FCFS: +401. 1%, UPBD: +104. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between UPBD and FCFS?

These companies operate in different sectors (UPBD (Technology) and FCFS (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: UPBD is a small-cap deep-value stock; FCFS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

UPBD

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 27%
  • Dividend Yield > 3.1%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FCFS

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform UPBD and FCFS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(UPBD: 3.7% · FCFS: 8.0%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(UPBD: 15.2x · FCFS: 30.5x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.