Software - Application
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
UPBD vs FCFS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
UPBD vs FCFS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $1.10B | $9.99B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.74B | $3.66B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $84M | $354M |
| Gross Margin | 45.2% | 51.7% |
| Operating Margin | 5.0% | 15.4% |
| Forward P/E | 4.5x | 21.0x |
| Total Debt | $1.86B | $2.82B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $121M | $125M |
UPBD vs FCFS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Upbound Group, Inc. (UPBD) | 100 | 74.7 | -25.3% |
| FirstCash Holdings,… (FCFS) | 100 | 324.5 | +224.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UPBD vs FCFS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UPBD is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 8.7%, EPS growth -43.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.4%
- 8.7% revenue growth vs FCFS's 8.0%
- Lower P/E (4.5x vs 21.0x)
FCFS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 0.31, yield 0.7%
- 401.1% 10Y total return vs UPBD's 104.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.31, current ratio 4.55x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.7% revenue growth vs FCFS's 8.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.5x vs 21.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.0% margin vs UPBD's 1.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.31 vs UPBD's 1.89, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 7.9% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FCFS's 0.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +69.9% vs UPBD's -11.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.0% ROA vs UPBD's 2.7%, ROIC 9.2% vs 7.3% |
UPBD vs FCFS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
UPBD vs FCFS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FCFS leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UPBD and FCFS operate at a comparable scale, with $4.7B and $3.7B in trailing revenue. FCFS is the more profitable business, keeping 9.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UPBD's 1.8%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.7B | $3.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.0B | $950M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $84M | $354M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $349M | $553M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.2% | +51.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.0% | +15.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.8% | +9.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.4% | +12.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.7% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +45.2% | +29.9% |
Valuation Metrics
UPBD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.2x trailing earnings, UPBD trades at a 50% valuation discount to FCFS's 30.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, UPBD's 10.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FCFS's 12.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $10.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.8B | $12.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.21x | 30.51x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 4.53x | 21.03x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.29x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.32x | 12.77x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.24x | 2.73x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.60x | 4.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.63x | 21.30x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FCFS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FCFS delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $12 for UPBD. FCFS carries lower financial leverage with a 1.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UPBD's 2.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FCFS scores 7/9 vs UPBD's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.1% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.7% | +7.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.3% | +9.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.5% | +12.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.67x | 1.24x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.7B | $2.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $121M | $125M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.9B | $2.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.41x | 4.72x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FCFS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FCFS five years ago would be worth $31,559 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,495 for UPBD. Over the past 12 months, FCFS leads with a +69.9% total return vs UPBD's -11.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FCFS at 30.6% vs UPBD's -9.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.8% | +44.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -11.8% | +69.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -25.0% | +122.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -55.0% | +215.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +104.4% | +401.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -9.1% | +30.6% |
Risk & Volatility
FCFS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FCFS is the less volatile stock with a 0.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UPBD's 1.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FCFS currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs UPBD's 67.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.89x | 0.31x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.03 | $227.42 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.82 | $119.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +67.8% | +99.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.1 | 72.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 845K | 340K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — UPBD and FCFS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates UPBD as "Buy" and FCFS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 108.7% upside for UPBD (target: $40) vs 11.3% for FCFS (target: $252). For income investors, UPBD offers the higher dividend yield at 7.89% vs FCFS's 0.70%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $39.67 | $252.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +7.9% | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 10 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.50 | $1.59 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.2% |
FCFS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). UPBD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
UPBD vs FCFS: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UPBD or FCFS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Upbound Group, Inc.
(UPBD) is the stronger pick with 8. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 0% for FirstCash Holdings, Inc (FCFS). Upbound Group, Inc. (UPBD) offers the better valuation at 15. 2x trailing P/E (4. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Upbound Group, Inc. (UPBD) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — UPBD or FCFS?
On trailing P/E, Upbound Group, Inc.
(UPBD) is the cheapest at 15. 2x versus FirstCash Holdings, Inc at 30. 5x. On forward P/E, Upbound Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 4. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — UPBD or FCFS?
Over the past 5 years, FirstCash Holdings, Inc (FCFS) delivered a total return of +215.
6%, compared to -55. 0% for Upbound Group, Inc. (UPBD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FCFS returned +401. 1% versus UPBD's +104. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — UPBD or FCFS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), FirstCash Holdings, Inc (FCFS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
31β versus Upbound Group, Inc. 's 1. 89β — meaning UPBD is approximately 513% more volatile than FCFS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, FirstCash Holdings, Inc (FCFS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 124% versus 3% for Upbound Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — UPBD or FCFS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Upbound Group, Inc.
(UPBD) is pulling ahead at 8. 7% versus 8. 0% for FirstCash Holdings, Inc (FCFS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FirstCash Holdings, Inc grew EPS 29. 5% year-over-year, compared to -43. 4% for Upbound Group, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — UPBD or FCFS?
FirstCash Holdings, Inc (FCFS) is the more profitable company, earning 9.
0% net margin versus 1. 6% for Upbound Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FCFS leads at 15. 4% versus 4. 8% for UPBD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FCFS leads at 51. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is UPBD or FCFS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Upbound Group, Inc.
(UPBD) trades at 4. 5x forward P/E versus 21. 0x for FirstCash Holdings, Inc — 16. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UPBD: 108. 7% to $39. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — UPBD or FCFS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Upbound Group, Inc. (UPBD) offers the highest yield at 7. 9%, versus 0. 7% for FirstCash Holdings, Inc (FCFS).
09Is UPBD or FCFS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, FirstCash Holdings, Inc (FCFS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
31), 0. 7% yield, +401. 1% 10Y return). Upbound Group, Inc. (UPBD) carries a higher beta of 1. 89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FCFS: +401. 1%, UPBD: +104. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between UPBD and FCFS?
These companies operate in different sectors (UPBD (Technology) and FCFS (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: UPBD is a small-cap deep-value stock; FCFS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.