VNO vs SLG

For growth investors, SL Green Realty Corp.

(SLG) is the stronger pick with 42. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 3% for Vornado Realty Trust (VNO). Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) offers the better valuation at 7. 5x trailing P/E (371. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) a "Hold" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, SL Green Realty Corp.

(SLG) delivered a total return of -15. 7%, compared to -20. 1% for Vornado Realty Trust (VNO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SLG returned -26. 2% versus VNO's -33. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

19β versus SL Green Realty Corp. 's 1. 20β — meaning SLG is approximately 1% more volatile than VNO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 116% versus 182% for SL Green Realty Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), SL Green Realty Corp.

(SLG) is pulling ahead at 42. 0% versus 1. 3% for Vornado Realty Trust (VNO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vornado Realty Trust grew EPS 104. 0% year-over-year, compared to -21. 2% for SL Green Realty Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SLG leads at 5. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) is the more profitable company, earning 50.

0% net margin versus -8. 8% for SL Green Realty Corp. — meaning it keeps 50. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SLG leads at 15. 4% versus 15. 0% for VNO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VNO leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VNO: 18.

8% to $37. 50.

In this comparison, VNO (2.

3% yield) pays a dividend. SLG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

19), 2. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VNO: -33. 7%, SLG: -26. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: VNO is a small-cap deep-value stock; SLG is a small-cap high-growth stock. VNO pays a dividend while SLG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.