Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
VWAV vs WAVE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Renewable Utilities
VWAV vs WAVE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Renewable Utilities |
| Market Cap | $85M | $48M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $168K |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1M | $-3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 75.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | -15.3% |
| Total Debt | $5M | $1M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $6M |
Quick Verdict: VWAV vs WAVE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VWAV is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 78.6% 10Y total return vs WAVE's -56.3%
- -2.2% margin vs WAVE's -17.6%
- +78.6% vs WAVE's +35.0%
WAVE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.25
- Rev growth -77.3%, EPS growth -73.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.25, Low D/E 24.4%, current ratio 2.49x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -77.3% revenue growth vs VWAV's -94.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | -2.2% margin vs WAVE's -17.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.25 vs VWAV's 1.54 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +78.6% vs WAVE's +35.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -30.7% ROA vs VWAV's -104.6% |
VWAV vs WAVE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VWAV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WAVE and VWAV operate at a comparable scale, with $168,000 and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $168,000 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$983,526 | -$2M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1M | -$3M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$687,780 | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +75.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -15.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -17.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -86.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.6% | -177.8% |
Valuation Metrics
WAVE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $85M | $48M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $87M | $43M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -10.43x | -12.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 1254.97x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 8.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
WAVE leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VWAV scores 2/9 vs WAVE's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -40.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -104.6% | -30.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -2.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -46.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.24x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3M | -$5M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $6M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $1M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -6.19x | -48.45x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — VWAV and WAVE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VWAV five years ago would be worth $17,859 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,369 for WAVE. Over the past 12 months, VWAV leads with a +78.6% total return vs WAVE's +35.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WAVE at 45.4% vs VWAV's 21.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -40.7% | +36.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +78.6% | +35.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +78.6% | +207.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +78.6% | -56.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +78.6% | -56.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +21.3% | +45.4% |
Risk & Volatility
WAVE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WAVE is the less volatile stock with a 1.25 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VWAV's 1.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WAVE currently trades 83.2% from its 52-week high vs VWAV's 37.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.64x | 1.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.80 | $9.87 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.06 | $4.41 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +37.0% | +83.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.5 | 67.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 513K | 15K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% |
WAVE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). VWAV leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
VWAV vs WAVE: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Which is the better long-term investment — VWAV or WAVE?
Over the past 5 years, VisionWave Holdings, Inc.
(VWAV) delivered a total return of +78. 6%, compared to -56. 3% for Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) (WAVE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VWAV returned +84. 1% versus WAVE's -58. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
02Which is safer — VWAV or WAVE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) (WAVE) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
01β versus VisionWave Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 64β — meaning VWAV is approximately 63% more volatile than WAVE relative to the S&P 500.
03Which is growing faster — VWAV or WAVE?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) grew EPS -73.
0% year-over-year, compared to -211. 1% for VisionWave Holdings, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
04Which has better profit margins — VWAV or WAVE?
VisionWave Holdings, Inc.
(VWAV) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -97. 3% for Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VWAV leads at 0. 0% versus -84. 2% for WAVE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VWAV leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — VWAV or WAVE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is VWAV or WAVE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) (WAVE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
01)). VisionWave Holdings, Inc. (VWAV) carries a higher beta of 1. 64 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WAVE: -58. 8%, VWAV: +84. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between VWAV and WAVE?
These companies operate in different sectors (VWAV (Industrials) and WAVE (Utilities)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.