WAVE vs AMRC

For growth investors, Ameresco, Inc.

(AMRC) is the stronger pick with 9. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -45. 1% for Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) (WAVE). Ameresco, Inc. (AMRC) offers the better valuation at 38. 0x trailing P/E (26. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ameresco, Inc. (AMRC) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Ameresco, Inc.

(AMRC) delivered a total return of -36. 2%, compared to -56. 7% for Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) (WAVE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMRC returned +601. 1% versus WAVE's -56. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) (WAVE) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

25β versus Ameresco, Inc. 's 2. 03β — meaning AMRC is approximately 63% more volatile than WAVE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) (WAVE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 173% for Ameresco, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ameresco, Inc.

(AMRC) is pulling ahead at 9. 2% versus -45. 1% for Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) (WAVE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) grew EPS -19. 4% year-over-year, compared to -22. 4% for Ameresco, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WAVE leads at 75. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Ameresco, Inc.

(AMRC) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 3% net margin versus -1236. 3% for Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) — meaning it keeps 2. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMRC leads at 6. 5% versus -1391. 7% for WAVE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WAVE leads at 75. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) (WAVE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

25)). Ameresco, Inc. (AMRC) carries a higher beta of 2. 03 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WAVE: -56. 7%, AMRC: +601. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (WAVE (Utilities) and AMRC (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.