Renewable Utilities
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
WAVE vs AMRC vs PESI vs ARRY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Engineering & Construction
Waste Management
Solar
WAVE vs AMRC vs PESI vs ARRY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Renewable Utilities | Engineering & Construction | Waste Management | Solar |
| Market Cap | $48M | $1.57B | $207M | $1.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $168K | $1.98B | $59M | $1.21B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $31M | $-18M | $-67M |
| Gross Margin | 75.0% | 15.6% | 4.1% | 22.4% |
| Operating Margin | -15.3% | 6.3% | -26.3% | 4.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 25.0x | — | 11.7x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $1.95B | $4M | $766M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $72M | $12M | $244M |
WAVE vs AMRC vs PESI vs ARRY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eco Wave Power Glob… (WAVE) | 100 | 100.9 | +0.9% |
| Ameresco, Inc. (AMRC) | 100 | 43.3 | -56.7% |
| Perma-Fix Environme… (PESI) | 100 | 194.9 | +94.9% |
| Array Technologies,… (ARRY) | 100 | 60.6 | -39.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WAVE vs AMRC vs PESI vs ARRY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WAVE is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.25, Low D/E 24.4%, current ratio 2.49x
- Beta 1.25, current ratio 2.49x
- Beta 1.25 vs ARRY's 2.32, lower leverage
AMRC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 5.4% 10Y total return vs PESI's 178.6%
- 1.6% margin vs WAVE's -17.6%
- +134.3% vs PESI's +26.2%
- 0.7% ROA vs WAVE's -30.7%, ROIC 3.3% vs -205.2%
PESI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.85
ARRY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 40.2%, EPS growth 62.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -7.8%
- 40.2% revenue growth vs WAVE's -77.3%
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 40.2% revenue growth vs WAVE's -77.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.6% margin vs WAVE's -17.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.25 vs ARRY's 2.32, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +134.3% vs PESI's +26.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.7% ROA vs WAVE's -30.7%, ROIC 3.3% vs -205.2% |
WAVE vs AMRC vs PESI vs ARRY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
WAVE vs AMRC vs PESI vs ARRY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WAVE leads in 2 of 6 categories
AMRC leads 1 • PESI leads 0 • ARRY leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMRC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMRC is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.0B annually — 11790.2x WAVE's $168,000. AMRC is the more profitable business, keeping 1.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WAVE's -17.6%. On growth, AMRC holds the edge at +13.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $168,000 | $2.0B | $59M | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $204M | -$14M | $95M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3M | $31M | -$18M | -$67M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | -$251M | -$14M | $58M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +75.0% | +15.6% | +4.1% | +22.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -15.3% | +6.3% | -26.3% | +4.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -17.6% | +1.6% | -30.1% | -5.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -86.2% | -12.7% | -23.4% | +4.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +13.8% | -20.1% | -26.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -177.8% | -2.5% | -110.5% | -7.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — AMRC and ARRY each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ARRY's 13.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AMRC's 15.0x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $48M | $1.6B | $207M | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $43M | $3.4B | $200M | $1.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -12.83x | 35.76x | -14.89x | -11.23x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 25.04x | — | 11.75x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 15.00x | — | 13.50x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1254.97x | 0.81x | 3.36x | 0.98x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.74x | 1.41x | 4.11x | 4.80x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 15.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — AMRC and PESI and ARRY each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMRC delivers a 2.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-41 for WAVE. PESI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARRY's 2.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PESI scores 5/9 vs WAVE's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -40.9% | +2.9% | -34.5% | -20.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -30.7% | +0.7% | -20.2% | -4.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.1% | +3.3% | -21.7% | +9.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -46.1% | +3.7% | -16.7% | +8.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.24x | 1.73x | 0.09x | 2.94x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | $1.9B | -$7M | $522M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $72M | $12M | $244M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $1.9B | $4M | $766M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -48.45x | 1.20x | -42.14x | -2.42x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WAVE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PESI five years ago would be worth $14,563 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,233 for ARRY. Over the past 12 months, AMRC leads with a +134.3% total return vs PESI's +26.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WAVE at 45.4% vs ARRY's -24.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +36.4% | -3.2% | -8.8% | -15.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +35.0% | +134.3% | +26.2% | +62.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +207.5% | -29.9% | +21.7% | -56.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.3% | -44.0% | +45.6% | -67.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.3% | +542.4% | +178.6% | -77.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +45.4% | -11.2% | +6.8% | -24.0% |
Risk & Volatility
WAVE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WAVE is the less volatile stock with a 1.25 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARRY's 2.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WAVE currently trades 83.2% from its 52-week high vs AMRC's 66.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.25x | 2.03x | 1.85x | 2.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.87 | $44.93 | $16.50 | $12.23 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.41 | $12.37 | $8.02 | $4.92 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.2% | +66.1% | +67.7% | +67.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.5 | 68.0 | 41.5 | 56.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 15K | 507K | 164K | 6.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AMRC as "Buy", PESI as "Hold", ARRY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 61.1% upside for PESI (target: $18) vs 11.8% for ARRY (target: $9).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $43.17 | $18.00 | $9.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 23 | 1 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
WAVE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). AMRC leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
WAVE vs AMRC vs PESI vs ARRY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WAVE or AMRC or PESI or ARRY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Array Technologies, Inc.
(ARRY) is the stronger pick with 40. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -77. 3% for Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) (WAVE). Ameresco, Inc. (AMRC) offers the better valuation at 35. 8x trailing P/E (25. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ameresco, Inc. (AMRC) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WAVE or AMRC or PESI or ARRY?
On forward P/E, Array Technologies, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 11. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WAVE or AMRC or PESI or ARRY?
Over the past 5 years, Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.
(PESI) delivered a total return of +45. 6%, compared to -67. 7% for Array Technologies, Inc. (ARRY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMRC returned +542. 4% versus ARRY's -77. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WAVE or AMRC or PESI or ARRY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) (WAVE) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
25β versus Array Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 32β — meaning ARRY is approximately 86% more volatile than WAVE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (PESI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 3% for Array Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WAVE or AMRC or PESI or ARRY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Array Technologies, Inc.
(ARRY) is pulling ahead at 40. 2% versus -77. 3% for Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) (WAVE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Array Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 62. 6% year-over-year, compared to -73. 0% for Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ). Over a 3-year CAGR, WAVE leads at 13. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WAVE or AMRC or PESI or ARRY?
Ameresco, Inc.
(AMRC) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 3% net margin versus -97. 3% for Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) — meaning it keeps 2. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ARRY leads at 6. 6% versus -84. 2% for WAVE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARRY leads at 21. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WAVE or AMRC or PESI or ARRY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Array Technologies, Inc.
(ARRY) trades at 11. 7x forward P/E versus 25. 0x for Ameresco, Inc. — 13. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PESI: 61. 1% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — WAVE or AMRC or PESI or ARRY?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is WAVE or AMRC or PESI or ARRY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) (WAVE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
25)). Array Technologies, Inc. (ARRY) carries a higher beta of 2. 32 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WAVE: -56. 3%, ARRY: -77. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WAVE and AMRC and PESI and ARRY?
These companies operate in different sectors (WAVE (Utilities) and AMRC (Industrials) and PESI (Industrials) and ARRY (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: WAVE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMRC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PESI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARRY is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.