WB
Weibo Corporation
Internet Content & Information
Market Cap$1.33B
5Y Perf.-72.5%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
WB vs PINS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
PINS
Pinterest, Inc.
Internet Content & Information
Market Cap$14.07B
5Y Perf.+4.3%
WB vs PINS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | WB | PINS |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $1.33B | $14.07B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.76B | $4.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $372M | $334M |
| Gross Margin | 78.2% | 79.9% |
| Operating Margin | 29.2% | 6.3% |
| Forward P/E | 5.2x | 11.6x |
| Total Debt | $1.91B | $262M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.89B | $969M |
WB vs PINS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
WB
PINS
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weibo Corporation (WB) | 100 | 27.5 | -72.5% |
| Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) | 100 | 104.3 | +4.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WB vs PINS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: WB leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Pinterest, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and operational efficiency and capital deployment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
WB
Weibo Corporation
The Income Pick
WB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.93, yield 8.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.93, Low D/E 53.2%, current ratio 3.61x
- Beta 0.93, yield 8.7%, current ratio 3.61x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
PINS
Pinterest, Inc.
The Growth Play
PINS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 15.8%, EPS growth -77.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.6%
- -13.2% 10Y total return vs WB's -49.3%
- 15.8% revenue growth vs WB's -0.3%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | PINS | 15.8% revenue growth vs WB's -0.3% |
| Value | WB | Lower P/E (5.2x vs 11.6x) |
| Quality / Margins | WB | 21.1% margin vs PINS's 7.6% |
| Stability / Safety | WB | Beta 0.93 vs PINS's 1.27 |
| Dividends | WB | 8.7% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | WB | +5.3% vs PINS's -21.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | PINS | 6.3% ROA vs WB's 5.7%, ROIC 6.1% vs 10.3% |
WB vs PINS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
Segment breakdown not available.
WB vs PINS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLWBLAGGINGPINS
PINSPinterest, Inc.
2leads
WBWeibo Corporation
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs PINSMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
WB4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
WB6/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
PINS5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
PINS4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
WB2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PINS is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.4B annually — 2.5x WB's $1.8B. WB is the more profitable business, keeping 21.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PINS's 7.6%. On growth, PINS holds the edge at +17.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | WBWeibo Corporation | PINSPinterest, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.8B | $4.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $535M | $294M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $372M | $334M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $1.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +78.2% | +79.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +29.2% | +6.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.1% | +7.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +33.0% | +27.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.6% | +17.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.9% | -10.3% |
WB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
WB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.3x trailing earnings, WB trades at a 79% valuation discount to PINS's 34.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WB's 2.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PINS's 38.7x.
| Metric | WBWeibo Corporation | PINSPinterest, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $14.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.3B | $13.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.30x | 34.70x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 5.22x | 11.62x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.38x | 38.73x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.76x | 3.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.63x | 3.07x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.30x | 11.24x |
WB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PINS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WB delivers a 10.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $8 for PINS. PINS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WB's 0.53x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WB scores 7/9 vs PINS's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | WBWeibo Corporation | PINSPinterest, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.3% | +7.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.7% | +6.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.3% | +6.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.0% | +6.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.53x | 0.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $15M | -$707M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.9B | $969M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.9B | $262M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.11x | 23.20x |
PINS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PINS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PINS five years ago would be worth $3,575 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,403 for WB. Over the past 12 months, WB leads with a +5.3% total return vs PINS's -21.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PINS at -0.7% vs WB's -10.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | WBWeibo Corporation | PINSPinterest, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.9% | -20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +5.3% | -21.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.6% | -1.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.0% | -64.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.3% | -13.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -10.6% | -0.7% |
PINS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WB is the less volatile stock with a 0.93 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PINS's 1.27 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WB currently trades 65.4% from its 52-week high vs PINS's 53.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | WBWeibo Corporation | PINSPinterest, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.93x | 1.27x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.96 | $39.93 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.10 | $13.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +65.4% | +53.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.0 | 71.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 16.0M |
WB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates WB as "Buy" and PINS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 102.8% upside for WB (target: $17) vs 19.8% for PINS (target: $25). WB is the only dividend payer here at 8.65% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | WBWeibo Corporation | PINSPinterest, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.18 | $25.36 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 47 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +8.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.73 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +6.6% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
WB leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). PINS leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns).
Best OverallWeibo Corporation (WB)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
WB vs PINS: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WB or PINS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Pinterest, Inc.
(PINS) is the stronger pick with 15. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 3% for Weibo Corporation (WB). Weibo Corporation (WB) offers the better valuation at 7. 3x trailing P/E (5. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Weibo Corporation (WB) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WB or PINS?
On trailing P/E, Weibo Corporation (WB) is the cheapest at 7.
3x versus Pinterest, Inc. at 34. 7x. On forward P/E, Weibo Corporation is actually cheaper at 5. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WB or PINS?
Over the past 5 years, Pinterest, Inc.
(PINS) delivered a total return of -64. 3%, compared to -76. 0% for Weibo Corporation (WB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PINS returned -13. 2% versus WB's -49. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WB or PINS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Weibo Corporation (WB) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
93β versus Pinterest, Inc. 's 1. 27β — meaning PINS is approximately 37% more volatile than WB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 53% for Weibo Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WB or PINS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Pinterest, Inc.
(PINS) is pulling ahead at 15. 8% versus -0. 3% for Weibo Corporation (WB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Weibo Corporation grew EPS -18. 9% year-over-year, compared to -77. 2% for Pinterest, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PINS leads at 14. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WB or PINS?
Weibo Corporation (WB) is the more profitable company, earning 17.
1% net margin versus 9. 9% for Pinterest, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WB leads at 28. 2% versus 7. 6% for PINS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PINS leads at 80. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WB or PINS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Weibo Corporation (WB) trades at 5.
2x forward P/E versus 11. 6x for Pinterest, Inc. — 6. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WB: 102. 8% to $17. 18.
08Which pays a better dividend — WB or PINS?
In this comparison, WB (8.
7% yield) pays a dividend. PINS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WB or PINS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Weibo Corporation (WB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
93), 8. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WB: -49. 3%, PINS: -13. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WB and PINS?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: WB is a small-cap deep-value stock; PINS is a mid-cap high-growth stock. WB pays a dividend while PINS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 12%
- Dividend Yield > 3.4%
Revenue Growth>
%
(WB: 1.6% · PINS: 17.8%)Net Margin>
%
(WB: 21.1% · PINS: 7.6%)P/E Ratio<
x
(WB: 7.3x · PINS: 34.7x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.