Chemicals - Specialty
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
WDFC vs HRB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Personal Products & Services
WDFC vs HRB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals - Specialty | Personal Products & Services |
| Market Cap | $4.19B | $4.60B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $621M | $1.52B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $90M | $300M |
| Gross Margin | 55.4% | 50.5% |
| Operating Margin | 16.4% | -1.5% |
| Forward P/E | 35.0x | 7.3x |
| Total Debt | $98M | $2.35B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $58M | $1.00B |
WDFC vs HRB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| WD-40 Company (WDFC) | 100 | 109.3 | +9.3% |
| H&R Block, Inc. (HRB) | 100 | 213.4 | +113.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WDFC vs HRB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WDFC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 5.0%, EPS growth 30.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.18, Low D/E 36.4%, current ratio 2.79x
- 5.0% revenue growth vs HRB's 4.2%
HRB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.02, yield 4.0%
- 140.6% 10Y total return vs WDFC's 122.4%
- Beta 0.02, yield 4.0%, current ratio 0.90x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.0% revenue growth vs HRB's 4.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.3x vs 35.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.8% margin vs WDFC's 14.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.02 vs WDFC's 0.18 | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield, 22-year raise streak, vs HRB's 4.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -8.3% vs HRB's -38.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.5% ROA vs HRB's 13.6%, ROIC 26.2% vs 46.4% |
WDFC vs HRB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WDFC vs HRB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WDFC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HRB is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 2.4x WDFC's $621M. HRB is the more profitable business, keeping 19.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WDFC's 14.4%. On growth, WDFC holds the edge at +0.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $621M | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $111M | $7M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $90M | $300M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $78M | -$649M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.4% | +50.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.4% | -1.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.4% | +19.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.6% | -42.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.6% | -99.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.9% | +23.5% |
Valuation Metrics
HRB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.3x trailing earnings, HRB trades at a 74% valuation discount to WDFC's 31.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HRB's 6.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WDFC's 37.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.2B | $4.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.2B | $5.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 31.35x | 8.26x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 35.02x | 7.26x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.59x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 37.76x | 6.29x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.76x | 1.22x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 10.61x | 56.05x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 50.23x | 7.68x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WDFC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HRB delivers a 6.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $34 for WDFC. WDFC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.36x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HRB's 26.41x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WDFC scores 7/9 vs HRB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +33.9% | +6.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +19.5% | +13.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +26.2% | +46.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +28.9% | +39.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.36x | 26.41x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $40M | $1.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $58M | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $98M | $2.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 32.08x | -7.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HRB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HRB five years ago would be worth $18,257 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,346 for WDFC. Over the past 12 months, WDFC leads with a -8.3% total return vs HRB's -38.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HRB at 8.1% vs WDFC's 6.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.6% | -13.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -8.3% | -38.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.6% | +26.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -6.5% | +82.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +122.4% | +140.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.1% | +8.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WDFC and HRB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HRB is the less volatile stock with a 0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WDFC's 0.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WDFC currently trades 82.8% from its 52-week high vs HRB's 56.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.18x | 0.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $253.24 | $64.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $175.38 | $28.16 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.8% | +56.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.3 | 37.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 177K | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WDFC and HRB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates WDFC as "Hold" and HRB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 43.0% upside for WDFC (target: $300) vs 13.0% for HRB (target: $41). For income investors, HRB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.96% vs WDFC's 1.77%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $300.00 | $41.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.8% | +4.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 22 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.70 | $1.44 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +9.5% |
WDFC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HRB leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 2 tied.
WDFC vs HRB: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WDFC or HRB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, WD-40 Company (WDFC) is the stronger pick with 5.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 2% for H&R Block, Inc. (HRB). H&R Block, Inc. (HRB) offers the better valuation at 8. 3x trailing P/E (7. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate WD-40 Company (WDFC) a "Hold" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WDFC or HRB?
On trailing P/E, H&R Block, Inc.
(HRB) is the cheapest at 8. 3x versus WD-40 Company at 31. 4x. On forward P/E, H&R Block, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WDFC or HRB?
Over the past 5 years, H&R Block, Inc.
(HRB) delivered a total return of +82. 6%, compared to -6. 5% for WD-40 Company (WDFC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HRB returned +140. 6% versus WDFC's +122. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WDFC or HRB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), H&R Block, Inc.
(HRB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 02β versus WD-40 Company's 0. 18β — meaning WDFC is approximately 683% more volatile than HRB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, WD-40 Company (WDFC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 36% versus 26% for H&R Block, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WDFC or HRB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), WD-40 Company (WDFC) is pulling ahead at 5.
0% versus 4. 2% for H&R Block, Inc. (HRB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: WD-40 Company grew EPS 30. 9% year-over-year, compared to 6. 6% for H&R Block, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WDFC leads at 6. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WDFC or HRB?
H&R Block, Inc.
(HRB) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 1% net margin versus 14. 7% for WD-40 Company — meaning it keeps 16. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HRB leads at 22. 0% versus 16. 7% for WDFC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WDFC leads at 55. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WDFC or HRB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, H&R Block, Inc.
(HRB) trades at 7. 3x forward P/E versus 35. 0x for WD-40 Company — 27. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WDFC: 43. 0% to $300. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — WDFC or HRB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
H&R Block, Inc. (HRB) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 1. 8% for WD-40 Company (WDFC).
09Is WDFC or HRB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, H&R Block, Inc.
(HRB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 02), 4. 0% yield, +140. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HRB: +140. 6%, WDFC: +122. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WDFC and HRB?
These companies operate in different sectors (WDFC (Basic Materials) and HRB (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: WDFC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HRB is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.