Travel Lodging
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
WH vs IHG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Travel Lodging
WH vs IHG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Travel Lodging | Travel Lodging |
| Market Cap | $6.21B | $22.52B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.44B | $10.13B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $193M | $1.39B |
| Gross Margin | 55.7% | 45.7% |
| Operating Margin | 28.8% | 22.3% |
| Forward P/E | 17.3x | 26.4x |
| Total Debt | $3.06B | $4.62B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $64M | $1.13B |
WH vs IHG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wyndham Hotels & Re… (WH) | 100 | 180.0 | +80.0% |
| InterContinental Ho… (IHG) | 100 | 312.7 | +212.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WH vs IHG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WH is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.80, yield 2.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.80, current ratio 0.71x
- Beta 0.80, yield 2.0%, current ratio 0.71x
IHG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 5.4%, EPS growth 26.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.1%
- 281.7% 10Y total return vs WH's 42.0%
- 5.4% revenue growth vs WH's 1.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.4% revenue growth vs WH's 1.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.3x vs 26.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.7% margin vs WH's 13.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.80 vs IHG's 0.96 | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs IHG's 1.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +29.0% vs WH's +0.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 26.0% ROA vs WH's 4.5%, ROIC 159.6% vs 9.4% |
WH vs IHG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WH vs IHG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IHG is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.1B annually — 7.0x WH's $1.4B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 13.7% (IHG) to 13.4% (WH).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.4B | $10.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $478M | $2.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $193M | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $304M | $1.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.7% | +45.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +28.8% | +22.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.4% | +13.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.1% | +15.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.5% | +2.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.6% | +8.0% |
Valuation Metrics
IHG leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 30.7x trailing earnings, IHG trades at a 8% valuation discount to WH's 33.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, IHG's 19.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WH's 19.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.2B | $22.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9.2B | $26.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 33.47x | 30.72x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.26x | 26.44x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.67x | 19.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.35x | 4.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 13.37x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.35x | 25.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IHG leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IHG scores 7/9 vs WH's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +37.3% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.5% | +26.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.4% | +159.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.9% | +39.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 6.53x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.0B | $3.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $64M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.1B | $4.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.00x | 17.19x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IHG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IHG five years ago would be worth $22,438 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,247 for WH. Over the past 12 months, IHG leads with a +29.0% total return vs WH's +0.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IHG at 30.7% vs WH's 8.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.4% | +7.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +0.0% | +29.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +29.2% | +123.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.5% | +124.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.0% | +281.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.9% | +30.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WH and IHG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WH is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IHG's 0.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IHG currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs WH's 89.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.80x | 0.96x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $92.69 | $151.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $69.21 | $109.79 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.2% | +99.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.6 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 233K |
Analyst Outlook
WH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates WH as "Buy" and IHG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 17.9% upside for WH (target: $98) vs 0.7% for IHG (target: $151). For income investors, WH offers the higher dividend yield at 2.03% vs IHG's 1.16%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $97.50 | $150.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +1.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.68 | $1.73 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.7% | +4.0% |
IHG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). WH leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
WH vs IHG: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WH or IHG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, InterContinental Hotels Group PLC (IHG) is the stronger pick with 5.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 5% for Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (WH). InterContinental Hotels Group PLC (IHG) offers the better valuation at 30. 7x trailing P/E (26. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (WH) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WH or IHG?
On trailing P/E, InterContinental Hotels Group PLC (IHG) is the cheapest at 30.
7x versus Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. at 33. 5x. On forward P/E, Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WH or IHG?
Over the past 5 years, InterContinental Hotels Group PLC (IHG) delivered a total return of +124.
4%, compared to +22. 5% for Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (WH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IHG returned +281. 7% versus WH's +42. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WH or IHG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
(WH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 80β versus InterContinental Hotels Group PLC's 0. 96β — meaning IHG is approximately 20% more volatile than WH relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — WH or IHG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), InterContinental Hotels Group PLC (IHG) is pulling ahead at 5.
4% versus 1. 5% for Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (WH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: InterContinental Hotels Group PLC grew EPS 26. 5% year-over-year, compared to -31. 6% for Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IHG leads at 10. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WH or IHG?
InterContinental Hotels Group PLC (IHG) is the more profitable company, earning 14.
6% net margin versus 13. 5% for Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WH leads at 28. 4% versus 23. 1% for IHG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WH leads at 58. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WH or IHG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
(WH) trades at 17. 3x forward P/E versus 26. 4x for InterContinental Hotels Group PLC — 9. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WH: 17. 9% to $97. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — WH or IHG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (WH) offers the highest yield at 2. 0%, versus 1. 2% for InterContinental Hotels Group PLC (IHG).
09Is WH or IHG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, InterContinental Hotels Group PLC (IHG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
96), 1. 2% yield, +281. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IHG: +281. 7%, WH: +42. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WH and IHG?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.