Regulated Water
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
WTTR vs ACDC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
WTTR vs ACDC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Regulated Water | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $1.78B | $1.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.40B | $1.94B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $22M | $-367M |
| Gross Margin | 18.2% | 3.7% |
| Operating Margin | 2.3% | -8.5% |
| Forward P/E | 43.2x | — |
| Total Debt | $374M | $1.14B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $18M | $23M |
WTTR vs ACDC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Select Water Soluti… (WTTR) | 100 | 206.0 | +106.0% |
| ProFrac Holding Cor… (ACDC) | 100 | 39.1 | -60.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WTTR vs ACDC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WTTR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -3.1%, EPS growth -33.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.5%
- 31.1% 10Y total return vs ACDC's -60.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.09, Low D/E 40.4%, current ratio 1.57x
ACDC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- beta 0.83
- Beta 0.83, current ratio 0.81x
- Beta 0.83 vs WTTR's 1.09
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -3.1% revenue growth vs ACDC's -11.4% | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.5% margin vs ACDC's -18.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs WTTR's 1.09 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +116.0% vs ACDC's +56.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.3% ROA vs ACDC's -13.1%, ROIC 2.3% vs -4.6% |
WTTR vs ACDC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WTTR vs ACDC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WTTR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACDC and WTTR operate at a comparable scale, with $1.9B and $1.4B in trailing revenue. WTTR is the more profitable business, keeping 1.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ACDC's -18.9%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.4B | $1.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $217M | $251M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $22M | -$367M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$95M | $20M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.2% | +3.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.3% | -8.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.5% | -18.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.8% | +1.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.3% | -4.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.4% | -33.3% |
Valuation Metrics
ACDC leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ACDC's 8.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WTTR's 10.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.8B | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.1B | $2.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 87.25x | -3.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 43.23x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.15x | 8.54x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.26x | 0.66x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.95x | 1.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 65.81x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WTTR leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WTTR delivers a 2.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $-38 for ACDC. WTTR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.40x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ACDC's 1.30x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.2% | -38.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.3% | -13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.3% | -4.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.9% | -6.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.40x | 1.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $356M | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $18M | $23M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $374M | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.54x | -1.22x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WTTR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WTTR five years ago would be worth $29,693 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,937 for ACDC. Over the past 12 months, WTTR leads with a +116.0% total return vs ACDC's +56.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WTTR at 34.7% vs ACDC's -11.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +58.6% | +76.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +116.0% | +56.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +144.4% | -30.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +196.9% | -60.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +31.1% | -60.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +34.7% | -11.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WTTR and ACDC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ACDC is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WTTR's 1.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WTTR currently trades 97.2% from its 52-week high vs ACDC's 66.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.09x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.95 | $10.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.20 | $3.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.2% | +66.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.9 | 63.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates WTTR as "Buy" and ACDC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply -8.3% upside for WTTR (target: $16) vs -15.8% for ACDC (target: $6). WTTR is the only dividend payer here at 1.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $16.00 | $6.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.32 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | 0.0% |
WTTR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ACDC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
WTTR vs ACDC: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WTTR or ACDC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Select Water Solutions, Inc.
(WTTR) is the stronger pick with -3. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 4% for ProFrac Holding Corp. (ACDC). Select Water Solutions, Inc. (WTTR) offers the better valuation at 87. 3x trailing P/E (43. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Select Water Solutions, Inc. (WTTR) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — WTTR or ACDC?
Over the past 5 years, Select Water Solutions, Inc.
(WTTR) delivered a total return of +196. 9%, compared to -60. 6% for ProFrac Holding Corp. (ACDC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WTTR returned +31. 1% versus ACDC's -60. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — WTTR or ACDC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ProFrac Holding Corp.
(ACDC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 83β versus Select Water Solutions, Inc. 's 1. 09β — meaning WTTR is approximately 32% more volatile than ACDC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Select Water Solutions, Inc. (WTTR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 40% versus 130% for ProFrac Holding Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — WTTR or ACDC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Select Water Solutions, Inc.
(WTTR) is pulling ahead at -3. 1% versus -11. 4% for ProFrac Holding Corp. (ACDC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Select Water Solutions, Inc. grew EPS -33. 3% year-over-year, compared to -66. 7% for ProFrac Holding Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WTTR leads at 0. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — WTTR or ACDC?
Select Water Solutions, Inc.
(WTTR) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 5% net margin versus -19. 0% for ProFrac Holding Corp. — meaning it keeps 1. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WTTR leads at 2. 5% versus -6. 9% for ACDC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WTTR leads at 14. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is WTTR or ACDC more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WTTR: -8.
3% to $16. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — WTTR or ACDC?
In this comparison, WTTR (1.
9% yield) pays a dividend. ACDC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is WTTR or ACDC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Select Water Solutions, Inc.
(WTTR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 09), 1. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WTTR: +31. 1%, ACDC: -60. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between WTTR and ACDC?
These companies operate in different sectors (WTTR (Utilities) and ACDC (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
WTTR pays a dividend while ACDC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.