Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
WYHG vs JBSS vs SENEA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaged Foods
Packaged Foods
WYHG vs JBSS vs SENEA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $41M | $876M | $749M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $98.97B | $1.14B | $1.61B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6.29B | $70M | $90M |
| Gross Margin | 29.0% | 19.1% | 12.6% |
| Operating Margin | 9.5% | 8.9% | 7.9% |
| Forward P/E | 5.3x | 11.4x | 10.7x |
| Total Debt | $29M | $102M | $375M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $85M | $585K | $43M |
WYHG vs JBSS vs SENEA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wing Yip Food Holdi… (WYHG) | 100 | 20.7 | -79.3% |
| John B. Sanfilippo … (JBSS) | 100 | 86.8 | -13.2% |
| Seneca Foods Corpor… (SENEA) | 100 | 199.4 | +99.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WYHG vs JBSS vs SENEA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WYHG has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in value and quality.
- Lower P/E (5.3x vs 10.7x)
- 6.4% margin vs SENEA's 5.6%
- 30.2% ROA vs SENEA's 7.4%, ROIC 109.1% vs 5.3%
JBSS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.14, yield 2.8%
- Rev growth 3.8%, EPS growth -2.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.14, Low D/E 28.3%, current ratio 2.22x
SENEA is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 360.6% 10Y total return vs JBSS's 138.4%
- 8.2% revenue growth vs WYHG's -8.8%
- +53.4% vs WYHG's -47.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.2% revenue growth vs WYHG's -8.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.3x vs 10.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.4% margin vs SENEA's 5.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.14 vs WYHG's 0.82 | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +53.4% vs WYHG's -47.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 30.2% ROA vs SENEA's 7.4%, ROIC 109.1% vs 5.3% |
WYHG vs JBSS vs SENEA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
WYHG vs JBSS vs SENEA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WYHG leads in 3 of 6 categories
SENEA leads 1 • JBSS leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WYHG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WYHG is the larger business by revenue, generating $99.0B annually — 86.6x JBSS's $1.1B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 6.4% (WYHG) to 5.6% (SENEA). On growth, JBSS holds the edge at +4.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $99.0B | $1.1B | $1.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $14.5B | $127M | $171M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $6.3B | $70M | $90M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$16M | $33M | $168M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.0% | +19.1% | +12.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.5% | +8.9% | +7.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.4% | +6.2% | +5.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.0% | +2.9% | +10.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -99.9% | +4.6% | +1.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -98.9% | +31.9% | +2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
WYHG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.3x trailing earnings, WYHG trades at a 78% valuation discount to SENEA's 24.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JBSS offers better value at 10.57x vs SENEA's 21.73x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $41M | $876M | $749M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $41M | $977M | $1.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.32x | 14.89x | 24.37x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.41x | 10.67x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 10.57x | 21.73x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.41x | 8.41x | 8.82x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.32x | 0.79x | 0.47x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 358.77x | 2.43x | 1.58x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 2.51x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WYHG leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WYHG delivers a 38.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $38 in annual profit, vs $13 for SENEA. WYHG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SENEA's 0.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SENEA scores 6/9 vs WYHG's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +38.0% | +19.5% | +12.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +30.2% | +11.7% | +7.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +109.1% | +15.2% | +5.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +89.1% | +20.4% | +7.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 0.28x | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$57M | $102M | $332M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $85M | $585,000 | $43M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $29M | $102M | $375M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.25x | 26.02x | 6.90x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SENEA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SENEA five years ago would be worth $30,594 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,922 for WYHG. Over the past 12 months, SENEA leads with a +53.4% total return vs WYHG's -47.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SENEA at 43.5% vs WYHG's -42.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +45.0% | +9.5% | +32.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -47.4% | +27.1% | +53.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.8% | -26.0% | +195.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.8% | -2.8% | +205.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.8% | +138.4% | +360.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -42.3% | -9.6% | +43.5% |
Risk & Volatility
JBSS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JBSS is the less volatile stock with a 0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WYHG's 0.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JBSS currently trades 88.0% from its 52-week high vs WYHG's 42.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.82x | 0.14x | 0.16x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.91 | $85.15 | $167.33 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.39 | $59.07 | $85.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +42.7% | +88.0% | +85.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.4 | 44.2 | 55.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 821K | 94K | 119K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — JBSS and SENEA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
JBSS is the only dividend payer here at 2.78% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.8% | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.08 | $0.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% | +1.5% |
WYHG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SENEA leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
WYHG vs JBSS vs SENEA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WYHG or JBSS or SENEA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Seneca Foods Corporation (SENEA) is the stronger pick with 8.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 8% for Wing Yip Food Holdings Group Limited American Depositary Shares (WYHG). Wing Yip Food Holdings Group Limited American Depositary Shares (WYHG) offers the better valuation at 5. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. (JBSS) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WYHG or JBSS or SENEA?
On trailing P/E, Wing Yip Food Holdings Group Limited American Depositary Shares (WYHG) is the cheapest at 5.
3x versus Seneca Foods Corporation at 24. 4x. On forward P/E, Seneca Foods Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. wins at 8. 09x versus Seneca Foods Corporation's 9. 51x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WYHG or JBSS or SENEA?
Over the past 5 years, Seneca Foods Corporation (SENEA) delivered a total return of +205.
9%, compared to -80. 8% for Wing Yip Food Holdings Group Limited American Depositary Shares (WYHG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SENEA returned +360. 6% versus WYHG's -80. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WYHG or JBSS or SENEA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), John B.
Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. (JBSS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 14β versus Wing Yip Food Holdings Group Limited American Depositary Shares's 0. 82β — meaning WYHG is approximately 510% more volatile than JBSS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Wing Yip Food Holdings Group Limited American Depositary Shares (WYHG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 59% for Seneca Foods Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WYHG or JBSS or SENEA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Seneca Foods Corporation (SENEA) is pulling ahead at 8.
2% versus -8. 8% for Wing Yip Food Holdings Group Limited American Depositary Shares (WYHG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. grew EPS -2. 3% year-over-year, compared to -31. 1% for Seneca Foods Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, WYHG leads at 5. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WYHG or JBSS or SENEA?
Wing Yip Food Holdings Group Limited American Depositary Shares (WYHG) is the more profitable company, earning 5.
9% net margin versus 2. 6% for Seneca Foods Corporation — meaning it keeps 5. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WYHG leads at 7. 8% versus 4. 9% for SENEA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WYHG leads at 29. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WYHG or JBSS or SENEA more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. (JBSS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 8. 09x versus Seneca Foods Corporation's 9. 51x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Seneca Foods Corporation (SENEA) trades at 10. 7x forward P/E versus 11. 4x for John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. — 0. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — WYHG or JBSS or SENEA?
In this comparison, JBSS (2.
8% yield) pays a dividend. WYHG, SENEA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WYHG or JBSS or SENEA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, John B.
Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. (JBSS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 14), 2. 8% yield, +138. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JBSS: +138. 4%, WYHG: -80. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WYHG and JBSS and SENEA?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: WYHG is a small-cap deep-value stock; JBSS is a small-cap deep-value stock; SENEA is a small-cap quality compounder stock. JBSS pays a dividend while WYHG, SENEA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare JBSS vs FRPT
FRPT is one of the most direct listed alternatives to JBSS.
Compare SENEA vs HAIN
HAIN is one of the most direct listed alternatives to SENEA.
Expand With SMPL + HAIN
SMPL and HAIN are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.