Auto - Parts
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
XPEL vs MPAA vs LCII
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Parts
Auto - Recreational Vehicles
XPEL vs MPAA vs LCII — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts | Auto - Recreational Vehicles |
| Market Cap | $1.21B | $220M | $2.83B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $490M | $771M | $4.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $53M | $2M | $202M |
| Gross Margin | 42.5% | 19.2% | 24.1% |
| Operating Margin | 13.2% | 6.1% | 7.0% |
| Forward P/E | 20.7x | 15.3x | 13.4x |
| Total Debt | $23M | $201M | $1.24B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $51M | $9M | $223M |
XPEL vs MPAA vs LCII — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| XPEL, Inc. (XPEL) | 100 | 294.4 | +194.4% |
| Motorcar Parts of A… (MPAA) | 100 | 72.5 | -27.5% |
| LCI Industries (LCII) | 100 | 117.7 | +17.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: XPEL vs MPAA vs LCII
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
XPEL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 13.3%, EPS growth 12.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.7%
- 7.1% 10Y total return vs LCII's 111.5%
- PEG 0.90 vs LCII's 3.48
MPAA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.99
- Lower volatility, beta 0.99, Low D/E 78.1%, current ratio 1.46x
- Beta 0.99, current ratio 1.46x
LCII is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends and momentum.
- 3.9% yield; 9-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend
- +45.6% vs XPEL's +23.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.3% revenue growth vs MPAA's 5.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.8% margin vs MPAA's 0.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.99 vs XPEL's 1.33 | |
| Dividends | 3.9% yield; 9-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.6% vs XPEL's +23.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.2% ROA vs MPAA's 0.2%, ROIC 19.5% vs 6.2% |
XPEL vs MPAA vs LCII — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
XPEL vs MPAA vs LCII — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
XPEL leads in 2 of 6 categories
MPAA leads 1 • LCII leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XPEL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LCII is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.2B annually — 8.5x XPEL's $490M. XPEL is the more profitable business, keeping 10.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MPAA's 0.3%. On growth, XPEL holds the edge at +13.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $490M | $771M | $4.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $77M | $49M | $385M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $53M | $2M | $202M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $58M | $30M | $245M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +42.5% | +19.2% | +24.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.2% | +6.1% | +7.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.8% | +0.3% | +4.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.8% | +3.9% | +5.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.1% | -9.9% | +4.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.4% | -18.2% | +30.4% |
Valuation Metrics
MPAA leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.4x trailing earnings, LCII trades at a 35% valuation discount to XPEL's 23.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), XPEL offers better value at 1.04x vs LCII's 4.01x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $220M | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $412M | $3.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 23.76x | -11.59x | 15.38x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.70x | 15.29x | 13.38x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.04x | — | 4.01x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.62x | 8.19x | 9.57x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.55x | 0.29x | 0.69x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.27x | 0.88x | 2.13x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.28x | 5.39x | 10.16x |
Profitability & Efficiency
XPEL leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
XPEL delivers a 19.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $1 for MPAA. XPEL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LCII's 0.91x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LCII scores 8/9 vs XPEL's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +19.1% | +0.8% | +14.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +14.2% | +0.2% | +6.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +19.5% | +6.2% | +9.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +22.2% | +6.6% | +10.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | 0.78x | 0.91x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$28M | $192M | $1.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $51M | $9M | $223M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $23M | $201M | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4060.77x | 0.94x | 5.49x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LCII leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LCII five years ago would be worth $9,386 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,829 for MPAA. Over the past 12 months, LCII leads with a +45.6% total return vs XPEL's +23.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MPAA at 34.5% vs XPEL's -14.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.5% | -7.2% | -5.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +23.5% | +24.3% | +45.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.5% | +143.5% | +11.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -30.2% | -51.7% | -6.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +712.6% | -62.7% | +111.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -14.5% | +34.5% | +3.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — XPEL and MPAA and LCII each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MPAA is the less volatile stock with a 0.99 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than XPEL's 1.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. XPEL currently trades 78.6% from its 52-week high vs MPAA's 63.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.33x | 0.99x | 0.99x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $55.91 | $18.12 | $159.66 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $31.26 | $9.09 | $82.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.6% | +63.3% | +72.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.9 | 58.0 | 45.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 267K | 87K | 352K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: XPEL as "Buy", MPAA as "Buy", LCII as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 74.4% upside for MPAA (target: $20) vs 29.3% for LCII (target: $151). LCII is the only dividend payer here at 3.94% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $58.00 | $20.00 | $150.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 7 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +3.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 9 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $4.59 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +2.2% | +4.5% |
XPEL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MPAA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
XPEL vs MPAA vs LCII: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is XPEL or MPAA or LCII a better buy right now?
For growth investors, XPEL, Inc.
(XPEL) is the stronger pick with 13. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 5% for Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. (MPAA). LCI Industries (LCII) offers the better valuation at 15. 4x trailing P/E (13. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate XPEL, Inc. (XPEL) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — XPEL or MPAA or LCII?
On trailing P/E, LCI Industries (LCII) is the cheapest at 15.
4x versus XPEL, Inc. at 23. 8x. On forward P/E, LCI Industries is actually cheaper at 13. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: XPEL, Inc. wins at 0. 90x versus LCI Industries's 3. 48x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — XPEL or MPAA or LCII?
Over the past 5 years, LCI Industries (LCII) delivered a total return of -6.
1%, compared to -51. 7% for Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. (MPAA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: XPEL returned +712. 6% versus MPAA's -62. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — XPEL or MPAA or LCII?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Motorcar Parts of America, Inc.
(MPAA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 99β versus XPEL, Inc. 's 1. 33β — meaning XPEL is approximately 35% more volatile than MPAA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, XPEL, Inc. (XPEL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 91% for LCI Industries — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — XPEL or MPAA or LCII?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), XPEL, Inc.
(XPEL) is pulling ahead at 13. 3% versus 5. 5% for Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. (MPAA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. grew EPS 60. 6% year-over-year, compared to 12. 1% for XPEL, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, XPEL leads at 13. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — XPEL or MPAA or LCII?
XPEL, Inc.
(XPEL) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus -2. 6% for Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: XPEL leads at 13. 2% versus 5. 3% for MPAA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — XPEL leads at 42. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is XPEL or MPAA or LCII more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, XPEL, Inc. (XPEL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 90x versus LCI Industries's 3. 48x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, LCI Industries (LCII) trades at 13. 4x forward P/E versus 20. 7x for XPEL, Inc. — 7. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MPAA: 74. 4% to $20. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — XPEL or MPAA or LCII?
In this comparison, LCII (3.
9% yield) pays a dividend. XPEL, MPAA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is XPEL or MPAA or LCII better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, LCI Industries (LCII) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
99), 3. 9% yield, +111. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LCII: +111. 5%, MPAA: -62. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between XPEL and MPAA and LCII?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: XPEL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MPAA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LCII is a small-cap deep-value stock. LCII pays a dividend while XPEL, MPAA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.