YDDL
One and one Green Technologies. Inc
Waste Management
Market Cap$187M
5Y Perf.-4.7%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
YDDL vs CLFD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
CLFD
Clearfield, Inc.
Communication Equipment
Market Cap$519M
5Y Perf.-0.8%
YDDL vs CLFD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | YDDL | CLFD |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Waste Management | Communication Equipment |
| Market Cap | $187M | $519M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $53M | $136M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6M | $-9M |
| Gross Margin | 19.8% | 37.2% |
| Operating Margin | 15.1% | 1.4% |
| Forward P/E | 21.3x | 72.1x |
| Total Debt | $785K | $9M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $21M |
Quick Verdict: YDDL vs CLFD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: YDDL leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Clearfield, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
YDDL
One and one Green Technologies. Inc
The Growth Play
YDDL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 29.5%, EPS growth 20.0%
- 29.5% revenue growth vs CLFD's 19.6%
- Lower P/E (21.3x vs 72.1x)
Best for: growth exposure
CLFD
Clearfield, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
CLFD is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 106.7% 10Y total return vs YDDL's -21.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.79, Low D/E 3.4%, current ratio 5.42x
- Beta 1.79, current ratio 5.42x
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | YDDL | 29.5% revenue growth vs CLFD's 19.6% |
| Value | YDDL | Lower P/E (21.3x vs 72.1x) |
| Quality / Margins | YDDL | 12.1% margin vs CLFD's -6.3% |
| Stability / Safety | CLFD | Lower D/E ratio (3.4% vs 3.8%) |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | CLFD | +20.2% vs YDDL's -21.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | YDDL | 21.6% ROA vs CLFD's -3.0%, ROIC 34.2% vs 0.6% |
YDDL vs CLFD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCLFDLAGGINGYDDL
YDDLOne and one Green Tec…
1leads
CLFDClearfield, Inc.
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs YDDLMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
CLFD4/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
YDDL6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
CLFD6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — YDDL and CLFD each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLFD is the larger business by revenue, generating $136M annually — 2.5x YDDL's $53M. YDDL is the more profitable business, keeping 12.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CLFD's -6.3%.
| Metric | YDDLOne and one Green… | CLFDClearfield, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $53M | $136M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $6M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$9M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $15M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +19.8% | +37.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.1% | +1.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.1% | -6.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.7% | +10.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -27.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -142.5% |
Evenly matched — YDDL and CLFD each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
CLFD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, YDDL's 20.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CLFD's 61.5x.
| Metric | YDDLOne and one Green… | CLFDClearfield, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $187M | $519M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $186M | $506M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 35.42x | -64.64x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 21.25x | 72.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.24x | 61.46x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.51x | 3.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 11.16x | 2.05x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 93.79x | 21.01x |
CLFD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
YDDL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
YDDL delivers a 36.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-3 for CLFD. CLFD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to YDDL's 0.04x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CLFD scores 7/9 vs YDDL's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | YDDLOne and one Green… | CLFDClearfield, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +36.2% | -3.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +21.6% | -3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +34.2% | +0.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +44.4% | +0.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | -$13M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $21M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $785,070 | $9M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 16141.22x | 85.32x |
YDDL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CLFD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CLFD five years ago would be worth $9,591 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,841 for YDDL. Over the past 12 months, CLFD leads with a +20.2% total return vs YDDL's -21.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLFD at 1.3% vs YDDL's -7.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | YDDLOne and one Green… | CLFDClearfield, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -22.6% | +27.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -21.6% | +20.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -21.6% | +3.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -21.6% | -4.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -21.6% | +106.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -7.8% | +1.3% |
CLFD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — YDDL and CLFD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
YDDL is the less volatile stock with a -1.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CLFD's 1.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CLFD currently trades 80.2% from its 52-week high vs YDDL's 26.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | YDDLOne and one Green… | CLFDClearfield, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -1.52x | 1.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.23 | $46.76 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.61 | $24.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +26.2% | +80.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.3 | 57.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 291K | 146K |
Evenly matched — YDDL and CLFD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | YDDLOne and one Green… | CLFDClearfield, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $43.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.2% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
CLFD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). YDDL leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
Best OverallClearfield, Inc. (CLFD)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
YDDL vs CLFD: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is YDDL or CLFD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, One and one Green Technologies.
Inc (YDDL) is the stronger pick with 29. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 19. 6% for Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD). One and one Green Technologies. Inc (YDDL) offers the better valuation at 35. 4x trailing P/E (21. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — YDDL or CLFD?
On forward P/E, One and one Green Technologies.
Inc is actually cheaper at 21. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — YDDL or CLFD?
Over the past 5 years, Clearfield, Inc.
(CLFD) delivered a total return of -4. 1%, compared to -21. 6% for One and one Green Technologies. Inc (YDDL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CLFD returned +106. 7% versus YDDL's -21. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — YDDL or CLFD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), One and one Green Technologies.
Inc (YDDL) is the lower-risk stock at -1. 52β versus Clearfield, Inc. 's 1. 79β — meaning CLFD is approximately -218% more volatile than YDDL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 4% for One and one Green Technologies. Inc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — YDDL or CLFD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), One and one Green Technologies.
Inc (YDDL) is pulling ahead at 29. 5% versus 19. 6% for Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Clearfield, Inc. grew EPS 31. 8% year-over-year, compared to 20. 0% for One and one Green Technologies. Inc. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — YDDL or CLFD?
One and one Green Technologies.
Inc (YDDL) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 1% net margin versus -5. 4% for Clearfield, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: YDDL leads at 15. 1% versus 1. 4% for CLFD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLFD leads at 33. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is YDDL or CLFD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, One and one Green Technologies.
Inc (YDDL) trades at 21. 3x forward P/E versus 72. 1x for Clearfield, Inc. — 50. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — YDDL or CLFD?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is YDDL or CLFD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, One and one Green Technologies.
Inc (YDDL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -1. 52)). Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) carries a higher beta of 1. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (YDDL: -21. 6%, CLFD: +106. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between YDDL and CLFD?
These companies operate in different sectors (YDDL (Industrials) and CLFD (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(YDDL: 29.5% · CLFD: -27.1%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.