Software - Application
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
YMT vs CANG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Dealerships
YMT vs CANG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Auto - Dealerships |
| Market Cap | $15M | $250M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $161M | $3.46B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-35M | $-178M |
| Gross Margin | 81.0% | 13.6% |
| Operating Margin | -21.1% | 7.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 5.7x |
| Total Debt | $302M | $170M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $1.29B |
Quick Verdict: YMT vs CANG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
YMT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.18
- Rev growth -14.0%, EPS growth 31.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.18, current ratio 0.10x
CANG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- -44.9% 10Y total return vs YMT's -94.9%
- -5.2% margin vs YMT's -21.6%
- -73.7% vs YMT's -94.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -14.0% revenue growth vs CANG's -52.7% | |
| Quality / Margins | -5.2% margin vs YMT's -21.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.18 vs CANG's 2.25 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -73.7% vs YMT's -94.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -2.3% ROA vs YMT's -51.1% |
YMT vs CANG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
YMT vs CANG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — YMT and CANG each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CANG is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.5B annually — 21.4x YMT's $161M. CANG is the more profitable business, keeping -5.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to YMT's -21.6%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $161M | $3.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $333M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$178M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +81.0% | +13.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -21.1% | +7.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -21.6% | -5.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -38.3% | -154.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +58.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +3.6% |
Valuation Metrics
YMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $15M | $250M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $59M | $85M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.90x | 5.66x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 3.13x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.64x | 2.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.42x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CANG leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -4.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -51.1% | -2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +4.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +4.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $299M | -$1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $1.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $302M | $170M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -35.30x | -1.87x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CANG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CANG five years ago would be worth $8,579 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $513 for YMT. Over the past 12 months, CANG leads with a -73.7% total return vs YMT's -94.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CANG at 0.4% vs YMT's -62.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -91.0% | -62.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -94.9% | -73.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.9% | +1.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.9% | -14.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.9% | -44.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -62.8% | +0.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — YMT and CANG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
YMT is the less volatile stock with a 1.18 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CANG's 2.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CANG currently trades 18.6% from its 52-week high vs YMT's 2.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.18x | 2.25x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.05 | $2.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.14 | $0.33 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +2.4% | +18.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 25.9 | 58.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.7M | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $3.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.3% |
CANG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). YMT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
YMT vs CANG: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is YMT or CANG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Yimutian Inc.
American Depositary Shares (YMT) is the stronger pick with -14. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). Cango Inc. (CANG) offers the better valuation at 5. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cango Inc. (CANG) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — YMT or CANG?
Over the past 5 years, Cango Inc.
(CANG) delivered a total return of -14. 2%, compared to -94. 9% for Yimutian Inc. American Depositary Shares (YMT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CANG returned -44. 9% versus YMT's -94. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — YMT or CANG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Yimutian Inc.
American Depositary Shares (YMT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 18β versus Cango Inc. 's 2. 25β — meaning CANG is approximately 90% more volatile than YMT relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — YMT or CANG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Yimutian Inc.
American Depositary Shares (YMT) is pulling ahead at -14. 0% versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cango Inc. grew EPS 960. 0% year-over-year, compared to 31. 6% for Yimutian Inc. American Depositary Shares. Over a 3-year CAGR, YMT leads at 7. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — YMT or CANG?
Cango Inc.
(CANG) is the more profitable company, earning 37. 3% net margin versus -21. 6% for Yimutian Inc. American Depositary Shares — meaning it keeps 37. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CANG leads at 22. 2% versus -21. 1% for YMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — YMT leads at 81. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — YMT or CANG?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is YMT or CANG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Yimutian Inc.
American Depositary Shares (YMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 18)). Cango Inc. (CANG) carries a higher beta of 2. 25 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (YMT: -94. 9%, CANG: -44. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between YMT and CANG?
These companies operate in different sectors (YMT (Technology) and CANG (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: YMT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CANG is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.