Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ZTS vs PCRX

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ZTS
Zoetis Inc.

Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$46.95B
5Y Perf.-20.2%
PCRX
Pacira BioSciences, Inc.

Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$932M
5Y Perf.-46.1%

ZTS vs PCRX — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ZTS logoZTS
PCRX logoPCRX
IndustryDrug Manufacturers - Specialty & GenericDrug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Market Cap$46.95B$932M
Revenue (TTM)$9.47B$735M
Net Income (TTM)$2.67B$9M
Gross Margin70.5%60.2%
Operating Margin38.0%3.4%
Forward P/E15.8x8.6x
Total Debt$9.49B$454M
Cash & Equiv.$2.31B$159M

ZTS vs PCRXLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ZTS
PCRX
StockMay 20May 26Return
Zoetis Inc. (ZTS)10079.8-20.2%
Pacira BioSciences,… (PCRX)10053.9-46.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ZTS vs PCRX

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: PCRX leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Zoetis Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ZTS
Zoetis Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

ZTS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 158.5% 10Y total return vs PCRX's -50.0%
  • 28.2% margin vs PCRX's 1.3%
  • 1.8% yield; 13-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: long-term compounding
PCRX
Pacira BioSciences, Inc.
The Income Pick

PCRX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • beta 0.47
  • Rev growth 3.6%, EPS growth 107.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.47, Low D/E 65.6%, current ratio 4.54x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthPCRX logoPCRX3.6% revenue growth vs ZTS's 2.3%
ValuePCRX logoPCRXLower P/E (8.6x vs 15.8x)
Quality / MarginsZTS logoZTS28.2% margin vs PCRX's 1.3%
Stability / SafetyPCRX logoPCRXBeta 0.47 vs ZTS's 0.90, lower leverage
DividendsZTS logoZTS1.8% yield; 13-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)PCRX logoPCRX-5.8% vs ZTS's -24.4%
Efficiency (ROA)ZTS logoZTS18.1% ROA vs PCRX's 0.7%, ROIC 26.9% vs 2.3%

ZTS vs PCRX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ZTSZoetis Inc.
FY 2025
Horses
67.8%$6.3B
Cattle
16.1%$1.5B
Swine
5.0%$466M
Poultry
4.7%$432M
Dogs and Cats
3.3%$304M
Fish
3.1%$286M
PCRXPacira BioSciences, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
50.9%$723M
EXPAREL
40.5%$575M
ZILRETTA
8.2%$117M
Bupivacaine Liposome Injectable Suspension
0.5%$7M

ZTS vs PCRX — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLZTSLAGGINGPCRX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ZTS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

ZTS is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.5B annually — 12.9x PCRX's $735M. ZTS is the more profitable business, keeping 28.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PCRX's 1.3%.

MetricZTS logoZTSZoetis Inc.PCRX logoPCRXPacira BioScience…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$9.5B$735M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$4.1B$95M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$2.7B$9M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$2.3B$133M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+70.5%+60.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+38.0%+3.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+28.2%+1.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+24.1%+18.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+3.0%+5.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+6.2%-30.0%
ZTS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

PCRX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 18.5x trailing earnings, ZTS trades at a 88% valuation discount to PCRX's 148.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PCRX's 9.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ZTS's 13.3x.

MetricZTS logoZTSZoetis Inc.PCRX logoPCRXPacira BioScience…
Market CapShares × price$46.9B$932M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$54.1B$1.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS18.48x148.06x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.15.83x8.62x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.54x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple13.25x9.87x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.96x1.28x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share14.82x1.54x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF20.56x6.82x
PCRX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ZTS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

ZTS delivers a 58.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $58 in annual profit, vs $1 for PCRX. PCRX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.66x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ZTS's 2.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PCRX scores 9/9 vs ZTS's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricZTS logoZTSZoetis Inc.PCRX logoPCRXPacira BioScience…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+58.2%+1.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+18.1%+0.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+26.9%+2.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+29.9%+2.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–979
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage2.85x0.66x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$7.2B$296M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$2.3B$159M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$9.5B$454M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense15.13x2.37x
ZTS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ZTS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ZTS five years ago would be worth $7,122 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,748 for PCRX. Over the past 12 months, PCRX leads with a -5.8% total return vs ZTS's -24.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ZTS at -14.2% vs PCRX's -17.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricZTS logoZTSZoetis Inc.PCRX logoPCRXPacira BioScience…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-10.8%-3.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-24.4%-5.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-36.8%-43.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-28.8%-62.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+158.5%-50.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-14.2%-17.5%
ZTS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

PCRX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

PCRX is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ZTS's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PCRX currently trades 85.7% from its 52-week high vs ZTS's 64.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricZTS logoZTSZoetis Inc.PCRX logoPCRXPacira BioScience…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.90x0.47x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$172.23$27.64
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$110.94$18.80
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+64.6%+85.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10037.454.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded3.2M694K
PCRX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Wall Street rates ZTS as "Hold" and PCRX as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 28.6% upside for ZTS (target: $143) vs 24.5% for PCRX (target: $30). ZTS is the only dividend payer here at 1.80% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricZTS logoZTSZoetis Inc.PCRX logoPCRXPacira BioScience…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$143.00$29.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts3036
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises13
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.00
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+6.9%+15.9%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

ZTS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PCRX leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).

Best OverallZoetis Inc. (ZTS)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ZTS vs PCRX: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ZTS or PCRX a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Pacira BioSciences, Inc.

(PCRX) is the stronger pick with 3. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 3% for Zoetis Inc. (ZTS). Zoetis Inc. (ZTS) offers the better valuation at 18. 5x trailing P/E (15. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Zoetis Inc. (ZTS) a "Hold" — based on 30 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ZTS or PCRX?

On trailing P/E, Zoetis Inc.

(ZTS) is the cheapest at 18. 5x versus Pacira BioSciences, Inc. at 148. 1x. On forward P/E, Pacira BioSciences, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ZTS or PCRX?

Over the past 5 years, Zoetis Inc.

(ZTS) delivered a total return of -28. 8%, compared to -62. 5% for Pacira BioSciences, Inc. (PCRX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ZTS returned +158. 5% versus PCRX's -50. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ZTS or PCRX?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pacira BioSciences, Inc.

(PCRX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 47β versus Zoetis Inc. 's 0. 90β — meaning ZTS is approximately 93% more volatile than PCRX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Pacira BioSciences, Inc. (PCRX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 66% versus 3% for Zoetis Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ZTS or PCRX?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Pacira BioSciences, Inc.

(PCRX) is pulling ahead at 3. 6% versus 2. 3% for Zoetis Inc. (ZTS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Pacira BioSciences, Inc. grew EPS 107. 4% year-over-year, compared to 10. 1% for Zoetis Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ZTS leads at 5. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ZTS or PCRX?

Zoetis Inc.

(ZTS) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 2% net margin versus 1. 0% for Pacira BioSciences, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ZTS leads at 38. 0% versus 4. 6% for PCRX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PCRX leads at 79. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ZTS or PCRX more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Pacira BioSciences, Inc.

(PCRX) trades at 8. 6x forward P/E versus 15. 8x for Zoetis Inc. — 7. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ZTS: 28. 6% to $143. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ZTS or PCRX?

In this comparison, ZTS (1.

8% yield) pays a dividend. PCRX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is ZTS or PCRX better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Zoetis Inc.

(ZTS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 90), 1. 8% yield, +158. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ZTS: +158. 5%, PCRX: -50. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ZTS and PCRX?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

ZTS pays a dividend while PCRX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

ZTS

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 16%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PCRX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 36%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ZTS and PCRX on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ZTS: 3.0% · PCRX: 5.0%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(ZTS: 18.5x · PCRX: 148.1x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.