Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ZTS vs PCRX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
ZTS vs PCRX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic |
| Market Cap | $46.95B | $932M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9.47B | $735M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.67B | $9M |
| Gross Margin | 70.5% | 60.2% |
| Operating Margin | 38.0% | 3.4% |
| Forward P/E | 15.8x | 8.6x |
| Total Debt | $9.49B | $454M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.31B | $159M |
ZTS vs PCRX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zoetis Inc. (ZTS) | 100 | 79.8 | -20.2% |
| Pacira BioSciences,… (PCRX) | 100 | 53.9 | -46.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ZTS vs PCRX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ZTS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 158.5% 10Y total return vs PCRX's -50.0%
- 28.2% margin vs PCRX's 1.3%
- 1.8% yield; 13-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
PCRX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.47
- Rev growth 3.6%, EPS growth 107.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.47, Low D/E 65.6%, current ratio 4.54x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.6% revenue growth vs ZTS's 2.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.6x vs 15.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 28.2% margin vs PCRX's 1.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs ZTS's 0.90, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield; 13-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -5.8% vs ZTS's -24.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.1% ROA vs PCRX's 0.7%, ROIC 26.9% vs 2.3% |
ZTS vs PCRX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ZTS vs PCRX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ZTS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ZTS is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.5B annually — 12.9x PCRX's $735M. ZTS is the more profitable business, keeping 28.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PCRX's 1.3%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $9.5B | $735M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4.1B | $95M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.7B | $9M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.3B | $133M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +70.5% | +60.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +38.0% | +3.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +28.2% | +1.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +24.1% | +18.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.0% | +5.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.2% | -30.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PCRX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.5x trailing earnings, ZTS trades at a 88% valuation discount to PCRX's 148.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PCRX's 9.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ZTS's 13.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $46.9B | $932M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $54.1B | $1.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.48x | 148.06x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.83x | 8.62x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.54x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.25x | 9.87x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.96x | 1.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 14.82x | 1.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.56x | 6.82x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ZTS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ZTS delivers a 58.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $58 in annual profit, vs $1 for PCRX. PCRX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.66x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ZTS's 2.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PCRX scores 9/9 vs ZTS's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +58.2% | +1.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +18.1% | +0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +26.9% | +2.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +29.9% | +2.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.85x | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7.2B | $296M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.3B | $159M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9.5B | $454M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 15.13x | 2.37x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ZTS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ZTS five years ago would be worth $7,122 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,748 for PCRX. Over the past 12 months, PCRX leads with a -5.8% total return vs ZTS's -24.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ZTS at -14.2% vs PCRX's -17.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.8% | -3.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -24.4% | -5.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.8% | -43.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.8% | -62.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +158.5% | -50.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -14.2% | -17.5% |
Risk & Volatility
PCRX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PCRX is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ZTS's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PCRX currently trades 85.7% from its 52-week high vs ZTS's 64.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.90x | 0.47x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $172.23 | $27.64 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $110.94 | $18.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.6% | +85.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.4 | 54.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.2M | 694K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ZTS as "Hold" and PCRX as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 28.6% upside for ZTS (target: $143) vs 24.5% for PCRX (target: $30). ZTS is the only dividend payer here at 1.80% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $143.00 | $29.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 30 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 13 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.00 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.9% | +15.9% |
ZTS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PCRX leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
ZTS vs PCRX: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ZTS or PCRX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Pacira BioSciences, Inc.
(PCRX) is the stronger pick with 3. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 3% for Zoetis Inc. (ZTS). Zoetis Inc. (ZTS) offers the better valuation at 18. 5x trailing P/E (15. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Zoetis Inc. (ZTS) a "Hold" — based on 30 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ZTS or PCRX?
On trailing P/E, Zoetis Inc.
(ZTS) is the cheapest at 18. 5x versus Pacira BioSciences, Inc. at 148. 1x. On forward P/E, Pacira BioSciences, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ZTS or PCRX?
Over the past 5 years, Zoetis Inc.
(ZTS) delivered a total return of -28. 8%, compared to -62. 5% for Pacira BioSciences, Inc. (PCRX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ZTS returned +158. 5% versus PCRX's -50. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ZTS or PCRX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pacira BioSciences, Inc.
(PCRX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 47β versus Zoetis Inc. 's 0. 90β — meaning ZTS is approximately 93% more volatile than PCRX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Pacira BioSciences, Inc. (PCRX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 66% versus 3% for Zoetis Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ZTS or PCRX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Pacira BioSciences, Inc.
(PCRX) is pulling ahead at 3. 6% versus 2. 3% for Zoetis Inc. (ZTS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Pacira BioSciences, Inc. grew EPS 107. 4% year-over-year, compared to 10. 1% for Zoetis Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ZTS leads at 5. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ZTS or PCRX?
Zoetis Inc.
(ZTS) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 2% net margin versus 1. 0% for Pacira BioSciences, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ZTS leads at 38. 0% versus 4. 6% for PCRX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PCRX leads at 79. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ZTS or PCRX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Pacira BioSciences, Inc.
(PCRX) trades at 8. 6x forward P/E versus 15. 8x for Zoetis Inc. — 7. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ZTS: 28. 6% to $143. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ZTS or PCRX?
In this comparison, ZTS (1.
8% yield) pays a dividend. PCRX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ZTS or PCRX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Zoetis Inc.
(ZTS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 90), 1. 8% yield, +158. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ZTS: +158. 5%, PCRX: -50. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ZTS and PCRX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
ZTS pays a dividend while PCRX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.