Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

AA vs LIN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
AA
Alcoa Corporation

Aluminum

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$16.38B
5Y Perf.+586.8%
LIN
Linde plc

Chemicals - Specialty

Basic MaterialsNASDAQ • GB
Market Cap$232.56B
5Y Perf.+148.0%

AA vs LIN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
AA logoAA
LIN logoLIN
IndustryAluminumChemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$16.38B$232.56B
Revenue (TTM)$12.74B$34.66B
Net Income (TTM)$1.15B$7.13B
Gross Margin13.6%46.0%
Operating Margin7.6%28.8%
Forward P/E9.1x28.1x
Total Debt$1M$26.99B
Cash & Equiv.$1.60B$5.06B

AA vs LINLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

AA
LIN
StockMay 20May 26Return
Alcoa Corporation (AA)100686.8+586.8%
Linde plc (LIN)100248.0+148.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: AA vs LIN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: LIN leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Alcoa Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
AA
Alcoa Corporation
The Growth Play

AA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 4.5%, EPS growth 14.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.77, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 1.45x
  • 4.5% revenue growth vs LIN's 3.0%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
LIN
Linde plc
The Income Pick

LIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.24, yield 1.2%
  • 376.9% 10Y total return vs AA's 188.8%
  • Beta 0.24, yield 1.2%, current ratio 0.88x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthAA logoAA4.5% revenue growth vs LIN's 3.0%
ValueAA logoAALower P/E (9.1x vs 28.1x)
Quality / MarginsLIN logoLIN20.6% margin vs AA's 9.0%
Stability / SafetyLIN logoLINBeta 0.24 vs AA's 1.77
DividendsLIN logoLIN1.2% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs AA's 0.6%
Momentum (1Y)AA logoAA+156.1% vs LIN's +13.6%
Efficiency (ROA)LIN logoLIN8.3% ROA vs AA's 7.1%, ROIC 11.3% vs 12.7%

AA vs LIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

AAAlcoa Corporation
FY 2024
Aluminum
51.1%$7.2B
Alumina
48.9%$6.9B
LINLinde plc
FY 2025
Americas Segment
45.9%$15.2B
EMEA Segment
25.8%$8.5B
APAC Segment
20.1%$6.7B
Engineering Segment
8.2%$2.7B

AA vs LIN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLLINLAGGINGAA

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

LIN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

LIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $34.7B annually — 2.7x AA's $12.7B. LIN is the more profitable business, keeping 20.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AA's 9.0%. On growth, LIN holds the edge at +8.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricAA logoAAAlcoa CorporationLIN logoLINLinde plc
RevenueTrailing 12 months$12.7B$34.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$1.6B$12.1B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$1.1B$7.1B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$567M$5.1B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+13.6%+46.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+7.6%+28.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+9.0%+20.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+4.5%+14.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-13.3%+8.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+11.8%+13.4%
LIN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

AA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 14.2x trailing earnings, AA trades at a 59% valuation discount to LIN's 34.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AA's 9.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LIN's 20.0x.

MetricAA logoAAAlcoa CorporationLIN logoLINLinde plc
Market CapShares × price$16.4B$232.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$14.8B$254.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS14.25x34.40x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.9.07x28.12x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.36x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.27x20.04x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.29x6.84x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.68x5.92x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF28.89x45.70x
AA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

AA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

AA delivers a 18.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $18 for LIN. AA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LIN's 0.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AA scores 7/9 vs LIN's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricAA logoAAAlcoa CorporationLIN logoLINLinde plc
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+18.5%+17.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+7.1%+8.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+12.7%+11.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+8.4%+13.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–976
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.00x0.68x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$1.6B$21.9B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1.6B$5.1B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1M$27.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense7.85x34.52x
AA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — AA and LIN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in LIN five years ago would be worth $17,813 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,307 for AA. Over the past 12 months, AA leads with a +156.1% total return vs LIN's +13.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AA at 20.5% vs LIN's 12.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricAA logoAAAlcoa CorporationLIN logoLINLinde plc
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+12.0%+17.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+156.1%+13.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+75.0%+41.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+63.1%+78.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+188.8%+376.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+20.5%+12.4%
Evenly matched — AA and LIN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

LIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

LIN is the less volatile stock with a 0.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AA's 1.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LIN currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs AA's 83.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricAA logoAAAlcoa CorporationLIN logoLINLinde plc
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.77x0.24x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$75.70$521.28
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$24.15$387.78
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+83.6%+96.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10043.850.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded5.5M2.3M
LIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

LIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates AA as "Buy" and LIN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.8% upside for AA (target: $69) vs 7.5% for LIN (target: $540). For income investors, LIN offers the higher dividend yield at 1.20% vs AA's 0.62%.

MetricAA logoAAAlcoa CorporationLIN logoLINLinde plc
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$68.80$539.71
# AnalystsCovering analysts4228
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.6%+1.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises06
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.39$6.00
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+2.0%
LIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

LIN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). AA leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.

Best OverallLinde plc (LIN)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

AA vs LIN: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is AA or LIN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Alcoa Corporation (AA) is the stronger pick with 4.

5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 0% for Linde plc (LIN). Alcoa Corporation (AA) offers the better valuation at 14. 2x trailing P/E (9. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alcoa Corporation (AA) a "Buy" — based on 42 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — AA or LIN?

On trailing P/E, Alcoa Corporation (AA) is the cheapest at 14.

2x versus Linde plc at 34. 4x. On forward P/E, Alcoa Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 1x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — AA or LIN?

Over the past 5 years, Linde plc (LIN) delivered a total return of +78.

1%, compared to +63. 1% for Alcoa Corporation (AA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LIN returned +376. 9% versus AA's +188. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — AA or LIN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Linde plc (LIN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

24β versus Alcoa Corporation's 1. 77β — meaning AA is approximately 638% more volatile than LIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alcoa Corporation (AA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 68% for Linde plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — AA or LIN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alcoa Corporation (AA) is pulling ahead at 4.

5% versus 3. 0% for Linde plc (LIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alcoa Corporation grew EPS 1486% year-over-year, compared to 7. 1% for Linde plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, LIN leads at 0. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — AA or LIN?

Linde plc (LIN) is the more profitable company, earning 20.

3% net margin versus 9. 0% for Alcoa Corporation — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LIN leads at 26. 3% versus 7. 6% for AA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LIN leads at 43. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is AA or LIN more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Alcoa Corporation (AA) trades at 9.

1x forward P/E versus 28. 1x for Linde plc — 19. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AA: 8. 8% to $68. 80.

08

Which pays a better dividend — AA or LIN?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Linde plc (LIN) offers the highest yield at 1. 2%, versus 0. 6% for Alcoa Corporation (AA).

09

Is AA or LIN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Linde plc (LIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

24), 1. 2% yield, +376. 9% 10Y return). Alcoa Corporation (AA) carries a higher beta of 1. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LIN: +376. 9%, AA: +188. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between AA and LIN?

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: AA is a mid-cap deep-value stock; LIN is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

AA

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LIN

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 12%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform AA and LIN on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(AA: -13.3% · LIN: 8.2%)
Net Margin>
%
(AA: 9.0% · LIN: 20.6%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(AA: 14.2x · LIN: 34.4x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.