Aluminum
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AA vs LIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals - Specialty
AA vs LIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aluminum | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $16.38B | $232.56B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12.74B | $34.66B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.15B | $7.13B |
| Gross Margin | 13.6% | 46.0% |
| Operating Margin | 7.6% | 28.8% |
| Forward P/E | 9.1x | 28.1x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $26.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.60B | $5.06B |
AA vs LIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alcoa Corporation (AA) | 100 | 686.8 | +586.8% |
| Linde plc (LIN) | 100 | 248.0 | +148.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AA vs LIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 4.5%, EPS growth 14.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.77, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 1.45x
- 4.5% revenue growth vs LIN's 3.0%
LIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.24, yield 1.2%
- 376.9% 10Y total return vs AA's 188.8%
- Beta 0.24, yield 1.2%, current ratio 0.88x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.5% revenue growth vs LIN's 3.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.1x vs 28.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.6% margin vs AA's 9.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.24 vs AA's 1.77 | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs AA's 0.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +156.1% vs LIN's +13.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.3% ROA vs AA's 7.1%, ROIC 11.3% vs 12.7% |
AA vs LIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AA vs LIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LIN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $34.7B annually — 2.7x AA's $12.7B. LIN is the more profitable business, keeping 20.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AA's 9.0%. On growth, LIN holds the edge at +8.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12.7B | $34.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.6B | $12.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.1B | $7.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $567M | $5.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +13.6% | +46.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.6% | +28.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.0% | +20.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.5% | +14.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -13.3% | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.8% | +13.4% |
Valuation Metrics
AA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.2x trailing earnings, AA trades at a 59% valuation discount to LIN's 34.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AA's 9.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LIN's 20.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $16.4B | $232.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $14.8B | $254.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.25x | 34.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.07x | 28.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.36x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.27x | 20.04x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.29x | 6.84x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.68x | 5.92x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 28.89x | 45.70x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AA delivers a 18.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $18 for LIN. AA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LIN's 0.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AA scores 7/9 vs LIN's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +18.5% | +17.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.1% | +8.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.7% | +11.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.4% | +13.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.68x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.6B | $21.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.6B | $5.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $27.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.85x | 34.52x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — AA and LIN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LIN five years ago would be worth $17,813 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,307 for AA. Over the past 12 months, AA leads with a +156.1% total return vs LIN's +13.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AA at 20.5% vs LIN's 12.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.0% | +17.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +156.1% | +13.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +75.0% | +41.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +63.1% | +78.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +188.8% | +376.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +20.5% | +12.4% |
Risk & Volatility
LIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LIN is the less volatile stock with a 0.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AA's 1.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LIN currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs AA's 83.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.77x | 0.24x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $75.70 | $521.28 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $24.15 | $387.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.6% | +96.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.8 | 50.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.5M | 2.3M |
Analyst Outlook
LIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates AA as "Buy" and LIN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.8% upside for AA (target: $69) vs 7.5% for LIN (target: $540). For income investors, LIN offers the higher dividend yield at 1.20% vs AA's 0.62%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $68.80 | $539.71 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 42 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.6% | +1.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.39 | $6.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.0% |
LIN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). AA leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
AA vs LIN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AA or LIN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alcoa Corporation (AA) is the stronger pick with 4.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 0% for Linde plc (LIN). Alcoa Corporation (AA) offers the better valuation at 14. 2x trailing P/E (9. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alcoa Corporation (AA) a "Buy" — based on 42 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AA or LIN?
On trailing P/E, Alcoa Corporation (AA) is the cheapest at 14.
2x versus Linde plc at 34. 4x. On forward P/E, Alcoa Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AA or LIN?
Over the past 5 years, Linde plc (LIN) delivered a total return of +78.
1%, compared to +63. 1% for Alcoa Corporation (AA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LIN returned +376. 9% versus AA's +188. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AA or LIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Linde plc (LIN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
24β versus Alcoa Corporation's 1. 77β — meaning AA is approximately 638% more volatile than LIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alcoa Corporation (AA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 68% for Linde plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AA or LIN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alcoa Corporation (AA) is pulling ahead at 4.
5% versus 3. 0% for Linde plc (LIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alcoa Corporation grew EPS 1486% year-over-year, compared to 7. 1% for Linde plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, LIN leads at 0. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AA or LIN?
Linde plc (LIN) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
3% net margin versus 9. 0% for Alcoa Corporation — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LIN leads at 26. 3% versus 7. 6% for AA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LIN leads at 43. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AA or LIN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Alcoa Corporation (AA) trades at 9.
1x forward P/E versus 28. 1x for Linde plc — 19. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AA: 8. 8% to $68. 80.
08Which pays a better dividend — AA or LIN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Linde plc (LIN) offers the highest yield at 1. 2%, versus 0. 6% for Alcoa Corporation (AA).
09Is AA or LIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Linde plc (LIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
24), 1. 2% yield, +376. 9% 10Y return). Alcoa Corporation (AA) carries a higher beta of 1. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LIN: +376. 9%, AA: +188. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AA and LIN?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AA is a mid-cap deep-value stock; LIN is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.