Asset Management
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
AAMI vs CLSK vs AMG vs MARA vs BEN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management - Cryptocurrency
Asset Management
Financial - Capital Markets
Asset Management
AAMI vs CLSK vs AMG vs MARA vs BEN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management - Cryptocurrency | Asset Management | Financial - Capital Markets | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $2.81B | $4.23B | $9.46B | $5.37B | $16.70B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $594M | $740M | $2.32B | $868M | $9.03B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $80M | $-501M | $717M | $-2.04B | $812M |
| Gross Margin | 92.9% | 19.2% | 62.0% | 0.3% | 73.8% |
| Operating Margin | 27.4% | -24.5% | 29.5% | 16.9% | 9.3% |
| Forward P/E | 16.4x | 14.7x | 10.1x | — | 11.7x |
| Total Debt | $323M | $824M | $2.69B | $3.65B | $13.30B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $101M | $43M | $586M | $547M | $3.57B |
AAMI vs CLSK vs AMG vs MARA vs BEN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acadian Asset Manag… (AAMI) | 100 | 630.3 | +530.3% |
| CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) | 100 | 636.3 | +536.3% |
| Affiliated Managers… (AMG) | 100 | 475.6 | +375.6% |
| Marathon Digital Ho… (MARA) | 100 | 1547.3 | +1447.3% |
| Franklin Resources,… (BEN) | 100 | 153.2 | +53.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AAMI vs CLSK vs AMG vs MARA vs BEN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AAMI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 471.7% 10Y total return vs AMG's 128.3%
- +148.2% vs MARA's -11.0%
- 11.5% ROA vs MARA's -28.0%, ROIC 29.2% vs -9.0%
CLSK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 102.2%, EPS growth 262.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 79.9%
- 102.2% revenue growth vs BEN's 3.5%
AMG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Better valuation composite
- 30.9% margin vs MARA's -234.8%
- Beta 1.09 vs CLSK's 3.62
Among these 5 stocks, MARA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
BEN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.32, yield 4.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.32, Low D/E 93.7%, current ratio 2.71x
- Beta 1.32, yield 4.1%, current ratio 2.71x
- 4.1% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs AAMI's 0.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 102.2% revenue growth vs BEN's 3.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.9% margin vs MARA's -234.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.09 vs CLSK's 3.62 | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs AAMI's 0.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +148.2% vs MARA's -11.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs MARA's -28.0%, ROIC 29.2% vs -9.0% |
AAMI vs CLSK vs AMG vs MARA vs BEN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
AAMI vs CLSK vs AMG vs MARA vs BEN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AMG leads in 2 of 6 categories
AAMI leads 2 • BEN leads 1 • CLSK leads 0 • MARA leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMG leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BEN is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.0B annually — 15.2x AAMI's $594M. AMG is the more profitable business, keeping 30.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MARA's -2.3%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $594M | $740M | $2.3B | $868M | $9.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $179M | $244M | $855M | $953M | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $80M | -$501M | $717M | -$2.0B | $812M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$14M | -$1.1B | $978M | -$385M | $938M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +92.9% | +19.2% | +62.0% | +0.3% | +73.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +27.4% | -24.5% | +29.5% | +16.9% | +9.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.5% | -67.7% | +30.9% | -2.3% | +9.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | -144.9% | +42.2% | -44.4% | +10.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -24.9% | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -14.2% | -2.1% | +149.1% | -113.5% | +100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — AMG and BEN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.7x trailing earnings, CLSK trades at a 59% valuation discount to AAMI's 35.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CLSK's 7.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BEN's 23.3x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.8B | $4.2B | $9.5B | $5.4B | $16.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.0B | $5.0B | $11.6B | $8.5B | $26.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 35.54x | 14.71x | 15.59x | -3.82x | 35.31x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.38x | — | 10.15x | — | 11.73x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.40x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.88x | 7.51x | 12.21x | — | 23.26x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.72x | 5.52x | 3.87x | 5.92x | 1.90x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 33.85x | 2.41x | 2.65x | 1.44x | 1.17x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.53x | — | 9.42x | — | 18.32x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AAMI leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AAMI delivers a 85.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $85 in annual profit, vs $-52 for MARA. CLSK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.38x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AAMI's 3.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AAMI scores 8/9 vs MARA's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +85.4% | -29.9% | +16.0% | -51.7% | +5.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.5% | -16.0% | +8.0% | -28.0% | +2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +29.2% | +10.3% | +8.1% | -9.0% | +1.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +31.9% | +13.7% | +8.6% | -12.1% | +2.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.84x | 0.38x | 0.61x | 1.05x | 0.94x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $222M | $781M | $2.1B | $3.1B | $9.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $101M | $43M | $586M | $547M | $3.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $323M | $824M | $2.7B | $3.6B | $13.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.60x | -15.45x | 9.69x | 12.66x | 15.19x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AAMI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AAMI five years ago would be worth $35,390 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,703 for MARA. Over the past 12 months, AAMI leads with a +148.2% total return vs MARA's -11.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLSK at 63.7% vs BEN's 11.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +66.2% | +42.7% | +22.8% | +42.1% | +36.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +148.2% | +69.7% | +92.7% | -11.0% | +47.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +252.6% | +338.3% | +143.1% | +50.9% | +37.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +253.9% | -15.7% | +120.9% | -53.0% | +13.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +471.7% | -82.2% | +128.3% | -66.0% | +39.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +52.2% | +63.7% | +34.5% | +14.7% | +11.1% |
Risk & Volatility
AMG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMG is the less volatile stock with a 1.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CLSK's 3.62 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMG currently trades 99.7% from its 52-week high vs MARA's 60.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.52x | 3.62x | 1.09x | 3.32x | 1.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $79.15 | $23.61 | $355.55 | $23.45 | $32.47 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $30.98 | $8.00 | $179.79 | $6.66 | $21.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.2% | +69.8% | +99.7% | +60.0% | +99.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.4 | 53.9 | 73.3 | 53.5 | 58.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 327K | 21.7M | 315K | 41.5M | 4.2M |
Analyst Outlook
BEN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AAMI as "Hold", CLSK as "Buy", AMG as "Buy", MARA as "Buy", BEN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 14.7% upside for CLSK (target: $19) vs -12.6% for AAMI (target: $69). For income investors, BEN offers the higher dividend yield at 4.13% vs CLSK's 0.21%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $68.67 | $18.90 | $402.50 | $12.50 | $32.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 11 | 12 | 20 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.1% | +0.2% | +0.0% | — | +4.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.04 | $0.03 | $0.03 | — | $1.33 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.7% | +3.4% | +7.5% | +0.9% | +1.4% |
AMG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). AAMI leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
AAMI vs CLSK vs AMG vs MARA vs BEN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AAMI or CLSK or AMG or MARA or BEN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CleanSpark, Inc.
(CLSK) is the stronger pick with 102. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 5% for Franklin Resources, Inc. (BEN). CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) offers the better valuation at 14. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AAMI or CLSK or AMG or MARA or BEN?
On trailing P/E, CleanSpark, Inc.
(CLSK) is the cheapest at 14. 7x versus Acadian Asset Management at 35. 5x. On forward P/E, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AAMI or CLSK or AMG or MARA or BEN?
Over the past 5 years, Acadian Asset Management (AAMI) delivered a total return of +253.
9%, compared to -53. 0% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AAMI returned +471. 7% versus CLSK's -82. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AAMI or CLSK or AMG or MARA or BEN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
(AMG) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 09β versus CleanSpark, Inc. 's 3. 62β — meaning CLSK is approximately 231% more volatile than AMG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 38% versus 4% for Acadian Asset Management — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AAMI or CLSK or AMG or MARA or BEN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CleanSpark, Inc.
(CLSK) is pulling ahead at 102. 2% versus 3. 5% for Franklin Resources, Inc. (BEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CleanSpark, Inc. grew EPS 262. 3% year-over-year, compared to -314. 5% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AAMI or CLSK or AMG or MARA or BEN?
CleanSpark, Inc.
(CLSK) is the more profitable company, earning 47. 6% net margin versus -144. 6% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 47. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLSK leads at 41. 6% versus -90. 6% for MARA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AAMI leads at 92. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AAMI or CLSK or AMG or MARA or BEN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
(AMG) trades at 10. 1x forward P/E versus 16. 4x for Acadian Asset Management — 6. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CLSK: 14. 7% to $18. 90.
08Which pays a better dividend — AAMI or CLSK or AMG or MARA or BEN?
In this comparison, BEN (4.
1% yield), CLSK (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. AAMI, AMG, MARA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AAMI or CLSK or AMG or MARA or BEN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Franklin Resources, Inc.
(BEN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (4. 1% yield). CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) carries a higher beta of 3. 62 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BEN: +39. 2%, CLSK: -82. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AAMI and CLSK and AMG and MARA and BEN?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AAMI is a small-cap high-growth stock; CLSK is a small-cap high-growth stock; AMG is a small-cap high-growth stock; MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock; BEN is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. BEN pays a dividend while AAMI, CLSK, AMG, MARA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.