ABM vs HON

For growth investors, Honeywell International Inc.

(HON) is the stronger pick with 7. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 6% for ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM). ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) offers the better valuation at 15. 5x trailing P/E (10. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Honeywell International Inc. (HON) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) is the cheapest at 15.

5x versus Honeywell International Inc. at 29. 0x. On forward P/E, ABM Industries Incorporated is actually cheaper at 10. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: ABM Industries Incorporated wins at 0. 04x versus Honeywell International Inc. 's 11. 03x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Honeywell International Inc.

(HON) delivered a total return of +1. 0%, compared to -14. 5% for ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HON returned +132. 4% versus ABM's +47. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

71β versus Honeywell International Inc. 's 0. 74β — meaning HON is approximately 4% more volatile than ABM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 95% versus 2% for Honeywell International Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Honeywell International Inc.

(HON) is pulling ahead at 7. 8% versus 4. 6% for ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ABM Industries Incorporated grew EPS 102. 3% year-over-year, compared to -15. 5% for Honeywell International Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ABM leads at 3. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Honeywell International Inc.

(HON) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 6% net margin versus 1. 9% for ABM Industries Incorporated — meaning it keeps 12. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HON leads at 17. 5% versus 3. 7% for ABM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HON leads at 36. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 04x versus Honeywell International Inc. 's 11. 03x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) trades at 10. 2x forward P/E versus 20. 2x for Honeywell International Inc. — 10. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ABM: 24. 4% to $50. 00.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) offers the highest yield at 2. 6%, versus 2. 2% for Honeywell International Inc. (HON).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Honeywell International Inc.

(HON) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74), 2. 2% yield, +132. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HON: +132. 4%, ABM: +47. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: ABM is a small-cap deep-value stock; HON is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.