Travel Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ABNB vs TCOM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Travel Services
ABNB vs TCOM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Travel Services | Travel Services |
| Market Cap | $84.96B | $34.23B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $11.94B | $59.76B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.63B | $31.17B |
| Gross Margin | 83.0% | 80.7% |
| Operating Margin | 22.6% | 26.0% |
| Forward P/E | 28.2x | 1.9x |
| Total Debt | $2.00B | $40.32B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6.56B | $48.44B |
ABNB vs TCOM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB) | 100 | 95.2 | -4.8% |
| Trip.com Group Limi… (TCOM) | 100 | 155.4 | +55.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ABNB vs TCOM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ABNB is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +11.9% vs TCOM's -13.4%
TCOM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.97
- Rev growth 19.7%, EPS growth 67.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 38.6%
- 20.2% 10Y total return vs ABNB's -3.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.7% revenue growth vs ABNB's 10.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.9x vs 28.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 52.2% margin vs ABNB's 22.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.97 vs ABNB's 1.33 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +11.9% vs TCOM's -13.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs ABNB's 11.4%, ROIC 8.1% vs 51.0% |
ABNB vs TCOM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ABNB vs TCOM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TCOM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TCOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $59.8B annually — 5.0x ABNB's $11.9B. TCOM is the more profitable business, keeping 52.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ABNB's 22.0%. On growth, TCOM holds the edge at +15.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $11.9B | $59.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.8B | $16.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.6B | $31.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4.6B | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +83.0% | +80.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.6% | +26.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +22.0% | +52.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +38.2% | +35.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.7% | +15.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.8% | +188.1% |
Valuation Metrics
TCOM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.4x trailing earnings, TCOM trades at a 58% valuation discount to ABNB's 34.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TCOM's 15.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ABNB's 31.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $85.0B | $34.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $80.4B | $33.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 34.67x | 14.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 28.20x | 1.88x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.81x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 31.60x | 15.01x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.94x | 4.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 10.62x | 1.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.29x | 12.28x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ABNB leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ABNB delivers a 30.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $18 for TCOM. ABNB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TCOM's 0.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TCOM scores 7/9 vs ABNB's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +30.6% | +18.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.4% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +51.0% | +8.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +26.3% | +9.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.24x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4.6B | -$8.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6.6B | $48.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.0B | $40.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 31.34x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TCOM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TCOM five years ago would be worth $13,703 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,608 for ABNB. Over the past 12 months, ABNB leads with a +11.9% total return vs TCOM's -13.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TCOM at 16.8% vs ABNB's 5.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.1% | -29.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +11.9% | -13.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +16.5% | +59.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.9% | +37.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.4% | +20.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.2% | +16.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ABNB and TCOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TCOM is the less volatile stock with a 0.97 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ABNB's 1.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ABNB currently trades 94.9% from its 52-week high vs TCOM's 66.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.33x | 0.97x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $147.25 | $78.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $110.81 | $48.48 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.9% | +66.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.4 | 48.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.5M | 2.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ABNB as "Hold" and TCOM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 43.1% upside for TCOM (target: $75) vs 4.1% for ABNB (target: $145).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $145.44 | $75.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 44 | 43 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.9% |
TCOM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ABNB leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
ABNB vs TCOM: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ABNB or TCOM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Trip.
com Group Limited (TCOM) is the stronger pick with 19. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 3% for Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB). Trip. com Group Limited (TCOM) offers the better valuation at 14. 4x trailing P/E (1. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Trip. com Group Limited (TCOM) a "Buy" — based on 43 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ABNB or TCOM?
On trailing P/E, Trip.
com Group Limited (TCOM) is the cheapest at 14. 4x versus Airbnb, Inc. at 34. 7x. On forward P/E, Trip. com Group Limited is actually cheaper at 1. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ABNB or TCOM?
Over the past 5 years, Trip.
com Group Limited (TCOM) delivered a total return of +37. 0%, compared to -13. 9% for Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TCOM returned +20. 2% versus ABNB's -3. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ABNB or TCOM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Trip.
com Group Limited (TCOM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 97β versus Airbnb, Inc. 's 1. 33β — meaning ABNB is approximately 37% more volatile than TCOM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 28% for Trip. com Group Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ABNB or TCOM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Trip.
com Group Limited (TCOM) is pulling ahead at 19. 7% versus 10. 3% for Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Trip. com Group Limited grew EPS 67. 7% year-over-year, compared to -1. 9% for Airbnb, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TCOM leads at 38. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ABNB or TCOM?
Trip.
com Group Limited (TCOM) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 0% net margin versus 20. 5% for Airbnb, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TCOM leads at 26. 6% versus 20. 8% for ABNB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ABNB leads at 83. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ABNB or TCOM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Trip.
com Group Limited (TCOM) trades at 1. 9x forward P/E versus 28. 2x for Airbnb, Inc. — 26. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TCOM: 43. 1% to $75. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ABNB or TCOM?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is ABNB or TCOM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Trip.
com Group Limited (TCOM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 97)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TCOM: +20. 2%, ABNB: -3. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ABNB and TCOM?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ABNB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TCOM is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.