Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ABVE vs ADM vs BG vs INGR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural Farm Products
Agricultural Farm Products
Packaged Foods
ABVE vs ADM vs BG vs INGR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Agricultural Farm Products | Agricultural Farm Products | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $6M | $37.36B | $24.02B | $6.77B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $95M | $80.61B | $80.54B | $7.22B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-23M | $1.08B | $686M | $729M |
| Gross Margin | -4.5% | 5.8% | 5.2% | 25.3% |
| Operating Margin | -21.2% | 1.5% | 2.4% | 14.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 18.6x | 14.4x | 9.6x |
| Total Debt | $118M | $8.41B | $16.95B | $1.79B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $952K | $1.01B | $1.14B | $1.03B |
ABVE vs ADM vs BG vs INGR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Above Food Ingredie… (ABVE) | 100 | 5.3 | -94.7% |
| Archer-Daniels-Midl… (ADM) | 100 | 128.3 | +28.3% |
| Bunge Global S.A. (BG) | 100 | 116.0 | +16.0% |
| Ingredion Incorpora… (INGR) | 100 | 93.6 | -6.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ABVE vs ADM vs BG vs INGR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ABVE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ADM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 31 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 2.6%
- 147.4% 10Y total return vs BG's 140.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.12, Low D/E 36.5%, current ratio 11.20x
- Beta 0.12, yield 2.6%, current ratio 11.20x
BG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 32.4%, EPS growth -38.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.5%
- 32.4% revenue growth vs ABVE's -7.1%
- +66.8% vs ABVE's -26.3%
INGR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (9.6x vs 14.4x)
- 10.1% margin vs ABVE's -24.6%
- 3.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs ADM's 2.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- 9.4% ROA vs ABVE's -67.1%, ROIC 15.5% vs -29.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 32.4% revenue growth vs ABVE's -7.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.6x vs 14.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.1% margin vs ABVE's -24.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs ABVE's 4.25 | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs ADM's 2.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +66.8% vs ABVE's -26.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.4% ROA vs ABVE's -67.1%, ROIC 15.5% vs -29.7% |
ABVE vs ADM vs BG vs INGR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ABVE vs ADM vs BG vs INGR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
INGR leads in 2 of 6 categories
ABVE leads 1 • BG leads 1 • ADM leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INGR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ADM is the larger business by revenue, generating $80.6B annually — 851.0x ABVE's $95M. INGR is the more profitable business, keeping 10.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ABVE's -24.6%. On growth, BG holds the edge at +87.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $95M | $80.6B | $80.5B | $7.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$19M | $3.0B | $2.8B | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$23M | $1.1B | $686M | $729M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | $4.8B | $112M | $809M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -4.5% | +5.8% | +5.2% | +25.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -21.2% | +1.5% | +2.4% | +14.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -24.6% | +1.3% | +0.9% | +10.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | +6.0% | +0.1% | +11.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +1.6% | +87.8% | -2.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +97.5% | +1.6% | -76.4% | +79.0% |
Valuation Metrics
ABVE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.6x trailing earnings, INGR trades at a 72% valuation discount to ADM's 34.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, INGR's 6.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BG's 22.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6M | $37.4B | $24.0B | $6.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $91M | $44.8B | $39.8B | $7.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.15x | 34.77x | 25.16x | 9.61x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 18.63x | 14.38x | 9.56x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.57x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 17.18x | 22.60x | 5.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.02x | 0.47x | 0.34x | 0.94x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.63x | 1.18x | 1.60x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.24x | 8.89x | — | 13.25x |
Profitability & Efficiency
INGR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INGR delivers a 17.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-81 for ABVE. ADM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BG's 0.97x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INGR scores 8/9 vs BG's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -80.9% | +4.7% | +4.3% | +17.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -67.1% | +2.2% | +1.6% | +9.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -29.7% | +3.3% | +3.3% | +15.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.4% | +4.2% | +4.5% | +16.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.37x | 0.97x | 0.41x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $117M | $7.4B | $15.8B | $760M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $952,280 | $1.0B | $1.1B | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $118M | $8.4B | $17.0B | $1.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -7.66x | 3.03x | 3.10x | 27.32x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BG five years ago would be worth $14,937 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $703 for ABVE. Over the past 12 months, BG leads with a +66.8% total return vs ABVE's -26.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BG at 13.5% vs ABVE's -58.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -63.5% | +32.2% | +34.4% | -0.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -26.3% | +66.2% | +66.8% | -18.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.0% | +10.7% | +46.3% | +7.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.0% | +29.2% | +49.4% | +28.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.0% | +147.4% | +140.3% | +13.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -58.7% | +3.4% | +13.5% | +2.6% |
Risk & Volatility
ADM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ADM is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ABVE's 4.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ADM currently trades 94.8% from its 52-week high vs ABVE's 10.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 4.25x | 0.12x | 0.25x | 0.25x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.56 | $81.75 | $133.93 | $141.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.32 | $46.81 | $71.60 | $100.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +10.2% | +94.8% | +92.4% | +75.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.1 | 68.4 | 51.8 | 27.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.2M | 3.8M | 1.7M | 585K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ADM and INGR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ADM as "Hold", BG as "Buy", INGR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 15.7% upside for INGR (target: $124) vs -22.6% for ADM (target: $60). For income investors, INGR offers the higher dividend yield at 3.01% vs BG's 2.23%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $60.00 | $133.67 | $124.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 36 | 25 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.6% | +2.2% | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 31 | 5 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.04 | $2.76 | $3.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.3% | +3.3% |
INGR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ABVE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
ABVE vs ADM vs BG vs INGR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ABVE or ADM or BG or INGR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bunge Global S.
A. (BG) is the stronger pick with 32. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 1% for Above Food Ingredients Inc. Common Stock (ABVE). Ingredion Incorporated (INGR) offers the better valuation at 9. 6x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bunge Global S. A. (BG) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ABVE or ADM or BG or INGR?
On trailing P/E, Ingredion Incorporated (INGR) is the cheapest at 9.
6x versus Archer-Daniels-Midland Company at 34. 8x. On forward P/E, Ingredion Incorporated is actually cheaper at 9. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ABVE or ADM or BG or INGR?
Over the past 5 years, Bunge Global S.
A. (BG) delivered a total return of +49. 4%, compared to -93. 0% for Above Food Ingredients Inc. Common Stock (ABVE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ADM returned +147. 4% versus ABVE's -93. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ABVE or ADM or BG or INGR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
12β versus Above Food Ingredients Inc. Common Stock's 4. 25β — meaning ABVE is approximately 3594% more volatile than ADM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 97% for Bunge Global S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ABVE or ADM or BG or INGR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bunge Global S.
A. (BG) is pulling ahead at 32. 4% versus -7. 1% for Above Food Ingredients Inc. Common Stock (ABVE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ingredion Incorporated grew EPS 15. 1% year-over-year, compared to -252. 8% for Above Food Ingredients Inc. Common Stock. Over a 3-year CAGR, BG leads at 1. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ABVE or ADM or BG or INGR?
Ingredion Incorporated (INGR) is the more profitable company, earning 10.
1% net margin versus -14. 5% for Above Food Ingredients Inc. Common Stock — meaning it keeps 10. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INGR leads at 14. 4% versus -11. 4% for ABVE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — INGR leads at 25. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ABVE or ADM or BG or INGR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Ingredion Incorporated (INGR) trades at 9.
6x forward P/E versus 18. 6x for Archer-Daniels-Midland Company — 9. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for INGR: 15. 7% to $124. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — ABVE or ADM or BG or INGR?
In this comparison, INGR (3.
0% yield), ADM (2. 6% yield), BG (2. 2% yield) pay a dividend. ABVE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ABVE or ADM or BG or INGR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
12), 2. 6% yield, +147. 4% 10Y return). Above Food Ingredients Inc. Common Stock (ABVE) carries a higher beta of 4. 25 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ADM: +147. 4%, ABVE: -93. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ABVE and ADM and BG and INGR?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ABVE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ADM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; INGR is a small-cap deep-value stock. ADM, BG, INGR pay a dividend while ABVE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Consumer Defensive
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 43%
- Dividend Yield > 0.8%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.