Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ABVE vs BRCC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaged Foods
ABVE vs BRCC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $6M | $146M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $95M | $418M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-23M | $-9M |
| Gross Margin | -4.5% | 33.9% |
| Operating Margin | -21.2% | -4.3% |
| Total Debt | $118M | $30M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $952K | $4M |
ABVE vs BRCC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Above Food Ingredie… (ABVE) | 100 | 5.3 | -94.7% |
| BRC Inc. (BRCC) | 100 | 20.4 | -79.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ABVE vs BRCC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
In this particular matchup, ABVE is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
BRCC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.73
- Rev growth 1.7%, EPS growth -213.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.7%
- -87.3% 10Y total return vs ABVE's -93.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.7% revenue growth vs ABVE's -7.1% | |
| Quality / Margins | -2.2% margin vs ABVE's -24.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.73 vs ABVE's 4.25 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -18.3% vs ABVE's -26.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -4.1% ROA vs ABVE's -67.1%, ROIC -15.8% vs -29.7% |
ABVE vs BRCC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ABVE vs BRCC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BRCC leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BRCC is the larger business by revenue, generating $418M annually — 4.4x ABVE's $95M. BRCC is the more profitable business, keeping -2.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ABVE's -24.6%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $95M | $418M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$19M | -$6M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$23M | -$9M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | -$2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -4.5% | +33.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -21.2% | -4.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -24.6% | -2.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | -0.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +21.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +97.5% | +101.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ABVE and BRCC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6M | $146M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $91M | $171M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.15x | -9.62x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.02x | 0.37x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.75x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.24x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BRCC leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BRCC delivers a -14.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-15 in annual profit, vs $-81 for ABVE. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ABVE scores 5/9 vs BRCC's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -80.9% | -14.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -67.1% | -4.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -29.7% | -15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.4% | -17.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $117M | $25M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $952,280 | $4M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $118M | $30M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -7.66x | -2.80x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BRCC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BRCC five years ago would be worth $1,270 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $703 for ABVE. Over the past 12 months, BRCC leads with a -18.3% total return vs ABVE's -26.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BRCC at -39.1% vs ABVE's -58.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -63.5% | +11.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -26.3% | -18.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.0% | -77.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.0% | -87.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.0% | -87.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -58.7% | -39.1% |
Risk & Volatility
BRCC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BRCC is the less volatile stock with a 1.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ABVE's 4.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BRCC currently trades 59.5% from its 52-week high vs ABVE's 10.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 4.25x | 1.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.56 | $2.10 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.32 | $0.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +10.2% | +59.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.1 | 68.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.2M | 774K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $2.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BRCC leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.
ABVE vs BRCC: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ABVE or BRCC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, BRC Inc.
(BRCC) is the stronger pick with 1. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 1% for Above Food Ingredients Inc. Common Stock (ABVE). Analysts rate BRC Inc. (BRCC) a "Hold" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ABVE or BRCC?
Over the past 5 years, BRC Inc.
(BRCC) delivered a total return of -87. 3%, compared to -93. 0% for Above Food Ingredients Inc. Common Stock (ABVE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BRCC returned -87. 3% versus ABVE's -93. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ABVE or BRCC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), BRC Inc.
(BRCC) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 73β versus Above Food Ingredients Inc. Common Stock's 4. 25β — meaning ABVE is approximately 146% more volatile than BRCC relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — ABVE or BRCC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), BRC Inc.
(BRCC) is pulling ahead at 1. 7% versus -7. 1% for Above Food Ingredients Inc. Common Stock (ABVE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BRC Inc. grew EPS -213. 3% year-over-year, compared to -252. 8% for Above Food Ingredients Inc. Common Stock. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ABVE or BRCC?
BRC Inc.
(BRCC) is the more profitable company, earning -3. 0% net margin versus -14. 5% for Above Food Ingredients Inc. Common Stock — meaning it keeps -3. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BRCC leads at -6. 2% versus -11. 4% for ABVE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BRCC leads at 34. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ABVE or BRCC?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is ABVE or BRCC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, BRC Inc.
(BRCC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Above Food Ingredients Inc. Common Stock (ABVE) carries a higher beta of 4. 25 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BRCC: -87. 3%, ABVE: -93. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ABVE and BRCC?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.