Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ABVE vs BYND
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaged Foods
ABVE vs BYND — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $6M | $414M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $95M | $265M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-23M | $244M |
| Gross Margin | -4.5% | 3.5% |
| Operating Margin | -21.2% | -82.4% |
| Total Debt | $118M | $508M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $952K | $208M |
ABVE vs BYND — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Above Food Ingredie… (ABVE) | 100 | 5.3 | -94.7% |
| Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND) | 100 | 13.3 | -86.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ABVE vs BYND
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ABVE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -7.1%, EPS growth -252.8%
- -93.0% 10Y total return vs BYND's -98.6%
- -7.1% revenue growth vs BYND's -15.6%
BYND carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.67
- Lower volatility, beta 1.67, current ratio 4.57x
- Beta 1.67, current ratio 4.57x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -7.1% revenue growth vs BYND's -15.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | 92.2% margin vs ABVE's -24.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.67 vs ABVE's 4.25 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -26.3% vs BYND's -64.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 39.3% ROA vs ABVE's -67.1%, ROIC -44.4% vs -29.7% |
ABVE vs BYND — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ABVE vs BYND — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABVE leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BYND is the larger business by revenue, generating $265M annually — 2.8x ABVE's $95M. BYND is the more profitable business, keeping 92.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ABVE's -24.6%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $95M | $265M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$19M | -$187M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$23M | $244M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | -$134M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -4.5% | +3.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -21.2% | -82.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -24.6% | +92.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | -50.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -15.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +97.5% | +90.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ABVE and BYND each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6M | $414M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $91M | $714M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.15x | -0.49x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.02x | 1.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.24x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ABVE leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ABVE scores 5/9 vs BYND's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -80.9% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -67.1% | +39.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -29.7% | -44.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.4% | -40.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $117M | $300M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $952,280 | $208M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $118M | $508M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -7.66x | -11.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ABVE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ABVE five years ago would be worth $703 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $81 for BYND. Over the past 12 months, ABVE leads with a -26.3% total return vs BYND's -64.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ABVE at -58.7% vs BYND's -59.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -63.5% | +1.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -26.3% | -64.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.0% | -93.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.0% | -99.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.0% | -98.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -58.7% | -59.1% |
Risk & Volatility
BYND leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BYND is the less volatile stock with a 1.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ABVE's 4.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 4.25x | 1.67x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.56 | $7.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.32 | $0.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +10.2% | +11.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.1 | 60.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.2M | 59.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Sell |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $44.55 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ABVE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BYND leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
ABVE vs BYND: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ABVE or BYND a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Above Food Ingredients Inc.
Common Stock (ABVE) is the stronger pick with -7. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 6% for Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND). Analysts rate Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND) a "Sell" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ABVE or BYND?
Over the past 5 years, Above Food Ingredients Inc.
Common Stock (ABVE) delivered a total return of -93. 0%, compared to -99. 2% for Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ABVE returned -93. 0% versus BYND's -98. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ABVE or BYND?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Beyond Meat, Inc.
(BYND) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 67β versus Above Food Ingredients Inc. Common Stock's 4. 25β — meaning ABVE is approximately 154% more volatile than BYND relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — ABVE or BYND?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Above Food Ingredients Inc.
Common Stock (ABVE) is pulling ahead at -7. 1% versus -15. 6% for Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Beyond Meat, Inc. grew EPS 24. 7% year-over-year, compared to -252. 8% for Above Food Ingredients Inc. Common Stock. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ABVE or BYND?
Beyond Meat, Inc.
(BYND) is the more profitable company, earning 79. 8% net margin versus -14. 5% for Above Food Ingredients Inc. Common Stock — meaning it keeps 79. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ABVE leads at -11. 4% versus -84. 7% for BYND. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BYND leads at 2. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ABVE or BYND?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is ABVE or BYND better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Beyond Meat, Inc.
(BYND) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Above Food Ingredients Inc. Common Stock (ABVE) carries a higher beta of 4. 25 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BYND: -98. 6%, ABVE: -93. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ABVE and BYND?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.