Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ABVE vs BYND vs SMPL vs OTLY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaged Foods
Packaged Foods
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
ABVE vs BYND vs SMPL vs OTLY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $6M | $414M | $1.24B | $336M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $95M | $265M | $1.45B | $893M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-23M | $244M | $91M | $-152M |
| Gross Margin | -4.5% | 3.5% | 34.0% | 32.6% |
| Operating Margin | -21.2% | -82.4% | 14.4% | -6.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 7.5x | — |
| Total Debt | $118M | $508M | $304M | $514M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $952K | $208M | $98M | $64M |
ABVE vs BYND vs SMPL vs OTLY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Above Food Ingredie… (ABVE) | 100 | 5.3 | -94.7% |
| Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND) | 100 | 13.3 | -86.7% |
| The Simply Good Foo… (SMPL) | 100 | 34.4 | -65.6% |
| Oatly Group AB (OTLY) | 100 | 57.3 | -42.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ABVE vs BYND vs SMPL vs OTLY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ABVE is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Better valuation composite
BYND has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.
- 92.2% margin vs ABVE's -24.6%
- 39.3% ROA vs ABVE's -67.1%, ROIC -44.4% vs -29.7%
SMPL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- beta 0.38
- Rev growth 9.0%, EPS growth -26.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.5%
- 3.7% 10Y total return vs ABVE's -93.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.38, Low D/E 16.8%, current ratio 3.64x
OTLY is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +0.2% vs BYND's -64.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.0% revenue growth vs BYND's -15.6% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 92.2% margin vs ABVE's -24.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.38 vs ABVE's 4.25 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +0.2% vs BYND's -64.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 39.3% ROA vs ABVE's -67.1%, ROIC -44.4% vs -29.7% |
ABVE vs BYND vs SMPL vs OTLY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ABVE vs BYND vs SMPL vs OTLY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SMPL leads in 3 of 6 categories
ABVE leads 1 • BYND leads 0 • OTLY leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SMPL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SMPL is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 15.3x ABVE's $95M. BYND is the more profitable business, keeping 92.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ABVE's -24.6%. On growth, OTLY holds the edge at +15.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $95M | $265M | $1.4B | $893M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$19M | -$187M | $231M | -$21M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$23M | $244M | $91M | -$152M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | -$134M | $174M | -$28M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -4.5% | +3.5% | +34.0% | +32.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -21.2% | -82.4% | +14.4% | -6.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -24.6% | +92.2% | +6.3% | -17.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | -50.6% | +12.0% | -3.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -15.3% | -0.3% | +15.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +97.5% | +90.9% | -31.6% | +4.8% |
Valuation Metrics
ABVE leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6M | $414M | $1.2B | $336M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $91M | $714M | $1.4B | $786M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.15x | -0.49x | 12.20x | -2.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 7.45x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.51x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 5.97x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.02x | 1.50x | 0.86x | 0.39x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — | 0.70x | 16.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.24x | — | 7.86x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SMPL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SMPL delivers a 5.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-4 for OTLY. SMPL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OTLY's 26.12x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ABVE scores 5/9 vs BYND's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -80.9% | — | +5.2% | -4.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -67.1% | +39.3% | +3.7% | -19.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -29.7% | -44.4% | +8.1% | -10.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.4% | -40.3% | +9.4% | -27.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 0.17x | 26.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $117M | $300M | $206M | $449M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $952,280 | $208M | $98M | $64M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $118M | $508M | $304M | $514M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -7.66x | -11.47x | 6.77x | -1.41x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SMPL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SMPL five years ago would be worth $3,565 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $81 for BYND. Over the past 12 months, OTLY leads with a +0.2% total return vs BYND's -64.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SMPL at -31.5% vs BYND's -59.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -63.5% | +1.3% | -36.4% | -3.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -26.3% | -64.9% | -64.8% | +0.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.0% | -93.1% | -67.8% | -75.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.0% | -99.2% | -64.3% | -97.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.0% | -98.6% | +3.7% | -97.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -58.7% | -59.1% | -31.5% | -37.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SMPL and OTLY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SMPL is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ABVE's 4.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OTLY currently trades 57.2% from its 52-week high vs ABVE's 10.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 4.25x | 1.67x | 0.38x | 1.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.56 | $7.69 | $36.92 | $18.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.32 | $0.50 | $10.21 | $9.26 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +10.2% | +11.6% | +33.7% | +57.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.1 | 60.7 | 42.9 | 40.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.2M | 59.5M | 2.8M | 64K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BYND as "Sell", SMPL as "Buy", OTLY as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 4889.9% upside for BYND (target: $45) vs 35.9% for OTLY (target: $15).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $44.55 | $20.17 | $14.64 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 21 | 24 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.1% | 0.0% |
SMPL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ABVE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
ABVE vs BYND vs SMPL vs OTLY: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ABVE or BYND or SMPL or OTLY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the stronger pick with 9.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 6% for Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND). The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) offers the better valuation at 12. 2x trailing P/E (7. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ABVE or BYND or SMPL or OTLY?
Over the past 5 years, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) delivered a total return of -64.
3%, compared to -99. 2% for Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SMPL returned +3. 7% versus BYND's -98. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ABVE or BYND or SMPL or OTLY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
38β versus Above Food Ingredients Inc. Common Stock's 4. 25β — meaning ABVE is approximately 1022% more volatile than SMPL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 26% for Oatly Group AB — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ABVE or BYND or SMPL or OTLY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is pulling ahead at 9.
0% versus -15. 6% for Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Oatly Group AB grew EPS 25. 5% year-over-year, compared to -252. 8% for Above Food Ingredients Inc. Common Stock. Over a 3-year CAGR, SMPL leads at 7. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ABVE or BYND or SMPL or OTLY?
Beyond Meat, Inc.
(BYND) is the more profitable company, earning 79. 8% net margin versus -17. 7% for Oatly Group AB — meaning it keeps 79. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SMPL leads at 15. 1% versus -84. 7% for BYND. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SMPL leads at 35. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is ABVE or BYND or SMPL or OTLY more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BYND: 4889.
9% to $44. 55.
07Which pays a better dividend — ABVE or BYND or SMPL or OTLY?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is ABVE or BYND or SMPL or OTLY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
38)). Above Food Ingredients Inc. Common Stock (ABVE) carries a higher beta of 4. 25 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SMPL: +3. 7%, ABVE: -93. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between ABVE and BYND and SMPL and OTLY?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ABVE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BYND is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SMPL is a small-cap deep-value stock; OTLY is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.